Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UMass, EPA agree-plan to replace contaminated windows at Lederle Grad Research Ctr over 15 yr period
The Republican on Masslive.com ^

Posted on 09/12/2012 4:58:08 PM PDT by matt04

Federal environmental officials and the University of Massachusetts have entered into a consent agreement for which the university will remove windows contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyl at the John W. Lederle Graduate Research Center over 15 years.

According to a prepared statement from the Environmental Protection Agency, UMass discovered that the window glazing at the research center was contaminated with high levels of contaminants after finishing a window-caulking project in 2009.

UMass has agreed to replace and dispose of all 900 PCB-contaminated windows over the next 15 years at a cost of about $3 million.

The university will complete window cleaning, encapsulation, verification and baseline sampling within 24 months, according to the release and to start removing windows in Tower A on floors 3, 7 and 8 by Dec. 31, according to a UMass statement.

The cost of these interim measures is about $560,000. The settlement agreement also includes a $75,000 civil penalty that will be waived if both the long-term remediation plan and interim encapsulation plan are completed, according to the release.

The window-glazing compound was commonly used in construction from the 1950s through the mid-1970s. The Lederle complex at UMass Amherst was constructed in the early 1970s.

(Excerpt) Read more at masslive.com ...


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: amherst; epa; umass
So these levels of PCBs have been present since the building was built in the 1970's and the EPA/UMass can't cite on instance of adverse health effects and the taxpayers are on the hook for millions.
1 posted on 09/12/2012 4:58:14 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: matt04

Full title: UMass, EPA agree on plan to replace contaminated windows at Lederle Graduate Research Center over 15 year period


2 posted on 09/12/2012 4:59:01 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Average window $3,333.00


3 posted on 09/12/2012 5:01:23 PM PDT by stocksthatgoup (Wealth = Net Worth ///// Income = Net Work)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Well that’s a freaking’ relief, I was really worried for awhile there.


4 posted on 09/12/2012 5:02:12 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Hopey changey Low emission unicorns and a crap sandwich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04
was contaminated with high levels of contaminants

LOL

5 posted on 09/12/2012 5:21:11 PM PDT by twistedwrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

my kid just moved into a dump at Zoo Mass with the same windows! Hope you are still burning in hell Teddy!


6 posted on 09/12/2012 5:29:18 PM PDT by acapesket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: matt04

All that leaded gasoline I pumped as a teenage gas jockey, and the mercury I played with as a kid have made me what I am today LOL.


7 posted on 09/12/2012 5:32:28 PM PDT by nascarnation (Defeat Baraq 2012. Deport Baraq 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Where is the contamination? In the glass? In the caulk?

Sounds like bedwetting...its not going to leach out of the glass and the caulk can be encapsulated/replaced.

Don’t understand this one.


8 posted on 09/12/2012 6:16:53 PM PDT by Adder (No Mo BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Adder
Where is the contamination?

If I remember correctly, the article stated it was in the glazing (caulk).

My question is: If it's so freakin' important, why is it OK to replace over them over 15 years? I think the obvious answer is that it's not important but the EPA feels the need to throw its weight around for any violation it finds regardless of the health risk.

9 posted on 09/12/2012 6:21:46 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Adder

It’s a money generator. People go around looking for this type of stuff, and when it’s found they rat to the EPA or file a suit. The end result is that either lawyers, or consultants with “ins” amongst the EPA and associated contractors get to make bank on jobs that are usually pretty restricted to a small clique of remediators. The agency gets billable time hours and fines.

If you piss off an agency they will hound you over an oil stain on pavement. If you have an “in”, they will let you slide on $10,000,000 in fines and let you “keep them appraised of the situation” with actual hazardous waste well past the disposal “expiration date” (and I have been close to that exact type of situation).

Many, many summers ago a now bankrupt company I knew of actually bought a facility that supposedly recycled certain nasty (but very useful) substances but was actually driving them around a certain metropolitan area in trucks to get them out of the facility when their inside friend at [insert large government environmental agency here] called them and told them an inspection was coming. Said bankrupt companies BK was greatly exacerbated by the multimillion dollar cleanup they purchased with their 3rd grader due dilligence.


10 posted on 09/12/2012 6:46:18 PM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: matt04

UMass students are know worldwide for their window caulking licking fetish. I am really pleased to hear that the EPA stepped in and for only a few million dollars and 15 years or so will remedy this horror.


11 posted on 09/12/2012 7:25:46 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Skittle pooping unicorns are more common than progressives with honor & integrity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson