I’ve retracted nothing, nor have I pretended anything. My words stand as posted.
Of course the law will ultimately decide these matters, up to and including the Voter ID law itself, although at this late date it is highly doubtful that it will do so with any finality before Nov. 6th.
Oh, OK, then you stand by the ridiculous claim that voter fraud in the upper age quartile isn't an issue, as well as the claim that a judge/clerk of elections will be able to examine a photo of the wrong person with a dead man's name on it and somehow "divine" that he is not who he claims to be.
Thanks for the clarification. I sure don't want to put words into your mouth.