Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Andrei Bulba

The article specifically states that the ID to be issued is a PHOTO ID. It would be an official County document and could only be used legally, therefore safely, by the person whose picture is on it.

This sounds very much to me what the Commonwealth General Assembly had in mind.

The only argument I see is that a uniform statewide standard is preferable, which is probably why Corbett and others object.

So let the state set the standard and order the counties to conform to it. In the meantime let election monitors scrutinize any photo ID presented.


9 posted on 09/21/2012 12:16:09 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: smoothsailing
And they could issue Photo ID's for people who've died in their nursing home as well, and the Commonwealth has a poor record of purging the rolls.

If the photo of a live person is issued to a dead name, what exactly will clerks and judges of elections (I am one, although not in this county) be able to "scrutinize?"

Nursing homes are run by SEIU. Beginning to understand the problem?

12 posted on 09/21/2012 12:38:28 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Who ya gonna believe? Your metrosexual smartphone or your lyin' eyes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson