Posted on 09/30/2012 5:19:02 AM PDT by Renfield
Neanderthals may have lived side by side with early humans and possibly interbred with them, according to new research.
Stone axes and sharp flint arrowheads of both branches of the human race have been discovered in limestone caves in northern Israel.
The findings, reported in the Times, have led archeologists to believe the two sub-species found harmony in a coastal mountain range that today is in a state of war with its neighbours...
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
I disagree.
I view this passage in the same way that I see Christians marrying non-Christians, for the same various reasons that people marry.
I’m convinced our high school football coach was part Neanderthal...
Neanderthals are human and always were, just as cro-magnon was human and fully human, too.
Sons of men were not followers of God. To me, the meaning seems clear. In a nutshell, God followers married nonbelievers.
It happens today and it’s that simple. Why is it necessarily so hard that it was that simple back then too?
Pretty women can get any man to turn his head, even dangerous women and many women will put up with bad men, provided that he is well off.
My favorite grant money is the flow of ketchup study.
"The new investigation also finds that Asians and South Americans possess more Neandertal genes than Europeans do"
This the welfare system for bad theory lazy scientists.
Or would that be the "live neanderthal found" thread?
I see a lot of that in the inner city.
Insert Tab A in Slot B.
But the reality is we were probably locked in a death-embrace as each species tried to kill the other.
When you see one representation of how Neanderthal might have looked, something in your deepest genetic material shrieks, "RUN OR KILL IT!!!"
Absolutely not, you need to read the book of Enoch. That were the meaning is.
They were both stuck in the cave [bomb shelter] together because it was raining hamas rockets outside.
Good point, I was taught in biology long ago that only members of the same species can produce fertile offspring. Two species may be able to produce offspring called hybrids but there is no third generation, the mule is the classic example, there are stories of mules giving birth to live offspring but if it happened there apparently was never a fourth generation. To say that Neanderthals passed down genes to the present day is to say that Neanderthals did not “interbreed with modern humans” it is to say that Neanderthals WERE modern humans, otherwise the offspring would have been infertile hybrids and no genes would have been passed down to the present. Nobody seems to have any desire to get the story straight these days.
Sons of men were not followers of God. To me, the meaning seems clear. In a nutshell, God followers married nonbelievers.
It happens today and it’s that simple. Why is it necessarily so hard that it was that simple back then too?
Pretty women can get any man to turn his head, even dangerous women and many women will put up with bad men, provided that he is well off.
The bible says nothing about sons of men in this particular scripture, it said the sons of God married unto the daughters of men.
You are right, pretty women can turn the heads of even godly men.
At any rate i still don,t get what your disagreement is.
The unibrows are still with us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.