Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Science Someday Rule Out the Possibility of God?
Yahoo News/LiveScience.com ^ | Tue, Sep 18, 2012 | Natalie Wolchover

Posted on 10/01/2012 11:16:12 PM PDT by Olog-hai

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-159 next last
There “can be no answer”?? Sean Carroll is no longer a scientist, then, but a witch doctor. Nor are any of those that are attempting to explain creation without a Creator, because they are asking us to have faith in their unobservable theories (i.e. fraud). We cannot observe a parallel universe. Nothing in the universe suggests any contraction—only expansion. Suggesting physical and chemical laws without a lawgiver is the ultimate fraud. Oppositions of science falsely so-called indeed.
1 posted on 10/01/2012 11:16:17 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Duh, no. We are physical and as such can never perform metaphysical experiments. There’s this principle called “finite but unbounded,” and it is used to pretend nothing is outside the universe. It is nonsense.


2 posted on 10/01/2012 11:19:31 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I have reasons to believe there is a God.


3 posted on 10/01/2012 11:23:04 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (Obama at the UN: The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Some “theoretical cosmetologist” at some fancy “institute” has a problem with God? So?


4 posted on 10/01/2012 11:29:44 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I remember someone saying that we use science as a way to understand the makings of God.


5 posted on 10/01/2012 11:35:33 PM PDT by wastedyears (The First Law of Heavy Metal: Not all metal is satanic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Science will have the answer sooner rather than later: http://www.patburt.com/


6 posted on 10/01/2012 11:35:33 PM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

god created evolution. problem solved


7 posted on 10/01/2012 11:37:31 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Always entertaining to read metaphysical pronouncements from people who have no acquaintance with metaphysics.


8 posted on 10/01/2012 11:38:53 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

No, not quite.

Besides, God does not need evolution, which frankly has never been proven at any time.


9 posted on 10/01/2012 11:39:21 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

From their pontifications, it also seems that their knowledge of observable physics is somewhat lacking.


10 posted on 10/01/2012 11:41:10 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
I half expect that late next month, headlines will announce the the Curiosity rover found evidence of life on Mars and therefore there is no God and Evangelicals are a bunch of superstitious fools and everyone needs to vote for hussein.

They tried that back in 1996.

11 posted on 10/01/2012 11:44:58 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Once again a journalist cherry picks a particular scientist to support the leftist agenda.


12 posted on 10/01/2012 11:47:32 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

it works for me


13 posted on 10/01/2012 11:48:24 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

That’s backwards. It’s the other way around. Science will “prove” the probability/reality of God. Religion and science eventually end up at the same place.


14 posted on 10/01/2012 11:51:44 PM PDT by GBA (The line is drawn, two choices left: We must pull back from the line or be forced to cross it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

“god created evolution. problem solved”

You’d think.

Scientist I know are fine with this.
Creationist may crucify you for suggesting it.


15 posted on 10/02/2012 12:04:31 AM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Enjoy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ImvlS8PLIo

Lawrence Krauss gives a talk on our current picture of the universe, how it will end, and how it could have come from nothing. Krauss is the author of many bestselling books on Physics and Cosmology, including “The Physics of Star Trek.”


16 posted on 10/02/2012 12:13:56 AM PDT by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

God is Truth.

If these scientists really are searching for truth, as opposed to searching for a world without God, they will find God.

If they really are searching for truth, they will have no choice but to find God.


17 posted on 10/02/2012 12:18:02 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

They have been saying this since the time of David.

Psalm 14-1

The fool says in his heart, “God does not exist.”
They are corrupt; they do vile deeds.
There is no one who does good.

Silly scientist, how can you think you can learn everything when with every new discovery, you learn about even more things that you don’t know and never thought of before.


18 posted on 10/02/2012 12:27:25 AM PDT by ThomasThomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

I’ve watched that before. How can the vacuum (”nothing”) be the most massive and energetic structure in the Universe, yet its existence taken for granted when one of these blowhards says the Universe came from nothing?


19 posted on 10/02/2012 12:38:29 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

God will be around long after Carroll is forgotten.

Perhaps God will rule out science, someday, and say, You just gotta have faith.

Stick around folks. It’s going to get very interesting.

But first we have to get rid of the Carbon Dioxide voodo scientists.

At least we have the plants on our side. They already have an organization, the EPA = Earth Plants Association.


20 posted on 10/02/2012 12:47:09 AM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

To claim that anything comes from “nothing” implies that matter should pop in and out of existence spontaneously even now. But it does not. Creation always violates the laws of thermodynamics, so it is not possible for something to arise out of nothing.


21 posted on 10/02/2012 12:52:19 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
sorry, but to me a "theoretical cosmologist" is not a scientist. Science is tracking observable actions, not making leaps of fancy

He wants to replace one deity with another "an all powerful sense of something".

22 posted on 10/02/2012 12:56:38 AM PDT by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GBA

religion does not compete with true science. True science talks about the how in observable actions. Religion deals with the intangible, science the tangible.


23 posted on 10/02/2012 12:58:01 AM PDT by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

I know that, but of course our buddies in the media want to set these neo-druids up as “scientists”.


24 posted on 10/02/2012 12:58:01 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
To claim that anything comes from “nothing” implies that matter should pop in and out of existence spontaneously even now.

Virtual particles do pop in and out of existence all the time.

25 posted on 10/02/2012 12:59:28 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett
Physics of Star Trek? fooey, I;ll take your Enterprise and squash it with a Star Destroyer -- matterofact, I'd bet a star destroyer against everything the Federation can toss at it.
26 posted on 10/02/2012 12:59:28 AM PDT by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Will God Someday Rule Out the Possibility of Science?


27 posted on 10/02/2012 1:04:32 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Those theoretical undetectable particles? Something has to be observable to be real to scientists, yes . . . ? The reality may be more edifying, I suspect.


28 posted on 10/02/2012 1:05:41 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai; FredZarguna
Some might say....

I know nothing.

29 posted on 10/02/2012 1:13:32 AM PDT by Daffynition (Self-respect: the secure feeling that no one, as yet, is suspicious. ~ HLM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Science falsely so-called, certainly.
And the king spake unto Ashpenaz the master of his eunuchs, that he should bring certain of the children of Israel, and of the king's seed, and of the princes; / Children in whom was no blemish, but well favoured, and skilful in all wisdom, and cunning in knowledge, and understanding science, and such as had ability in them to stand in the king’s palace, and whom they might teach the learning and the tongue of the Chaldeans.

— Daniel 1:3-4
The Hebrew word translated “science” here is also the modern Hebrew word for science (madda’ מדע).
30 posted on 10/02/2012 1:13:55 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

To discuss with hubby later.


31 posted on 10/02/2012 1:15:48 AM PDT by lulu16 (May the Good Lord take a liking to you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
All this discussion is a smoke screen. When you are dead, you cannot perceive God or Spiritual things. As you are born again, you then KNOW there is a change and a new person. A dead person will never understand this. As long as YOU see God, that is what matters. He introduces Himself to each individual in a way that is undeniable. The real question is why can't dead people understand what they see in other people changing their lives,.......because they are dead. They should be asking why they can't hear God, but it's easier to just say everyone else is crazy.

All the science discussion is just to try to prove there is no God. A Christian scientist knows there is God and sees His creation that way. If you look at the whole space program, it was mainly a program to try to prove water, bacteria, or some other organic material is somewhere off Earth. Finding a bacteria on Mars is a far cry from proving there is no God, but it makes them feel they are right and don't have to answer for their sins.

True science should prove evolution is impossible for an organism to stay alive long enough to mutate in a way to digest food, see with eyes, and other bodily functions. If you just look at the digestive system and it's enzymes, you should fall down in awe of the complexity involved to change a piece of meat into energy. How many organisms had to be born and then die because they couldn't eat and live before a mutant could digest food using hundreds of amino acids and enzymes? The mathematical possibilities are ZERO! How could they live long enough to reproduce without being able to eat? The questions write themselves.

32 posted on 10/02/2012 1:33:34 AM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
When secular science results in technological applications that produce reality and then life perhaps...

...until then it's all theory and theories that lack the logical and reasonable assumptions of a higher being being ultimately responsible for what is us and around us.

33 posted on 10/02/2012 1:34:03 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Mitt who? I'm voting for Ryan.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
As a scientist, the answer is "NO!"

There are fundamental contradictions which remain unexplained, there are ongoing missing links, and as Einstein said, "As the diameter of a circle of light grows, so does the circumference of the darkness around it."

We don't know what we don't know yet, but those who are prideful in the knowledge we do possess think differently.

When we can come up with next week's weather forecast (a reliable one) week after week, when we can predict earthquakes with reliability, and say with certainty where and when lightning will strike, get back to me.

Otherwise, it is great fun to toss our meager intellects against the majesty of Creation in an effort to understand what God hath wrought.

34 posted on 10/02/2012 1:37:40 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

What of the mathematical probability of developing DNA with sufficient instructions on how to digest material in order to prolong life and then reach the point of being able to reproduce . . . ? Enzymes themselves are programmed to catalyze but one chemical reaction, but who did the programming?—I have never seen any computer program write itself spontaneously (I’m sure IBM would have loved that, but that ain’t how it works).


35 posted on 10/02/2012 1:39:15 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I always thinks it is funny when scientists use their God given ability to Reason to prove there is no God. In order for Reason to be valid it cannot be the effect of an irrational cause, it must separate and independent of nature. Otherwise it is simply the epiphenomenon of chemical reactions, electrical impulses, etc.

God is laughing His head off over all this nonsense.


36 posted on 10/02/2012 1:49:06 AM PDT by HerrBlucher (Praise to the Lord the Almighty the King of Creation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve

> Creationist may crucify you for suggesting it.

We may vigorously disagree, but we don’t crucify anybody.

In fact, the atheist communists have probably killed more Christians than all the other persecutors combined.

It’s the Christians that are crucified in this world, literally as well as figuratively.

http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/shows/cwn/2009/October/Christians-Crucified-in-South-Sudan/

http://righttruth.typepad.com/right_truth/2007/07/christians-crud.html

... as well as shot to death, burned alive, beheaded, drowned, drawn and quartered, sawn in half, tortured.

http://www.persecution.com/

http://www.christianbook.com/foxes-book-of-martyrs/9780800786649/pd/0786645?event=CF

http://www.christianbook.com/martyrs-mirror-thieleman-van-braght/9780836113907/pd/611390X?event=CF


37 posted on 10/02/2012 1:51:26 AM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Trying to disprove the Creator is a fools errand.


38 posted on 10/02/2012 1:55:20 AM PDT by Bullish (The stink from this amateur regime smells all the way to Kenya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition; Olog-hai
Photobucket
39 posted on 10/02/2012 2:12:25 AM PDT by FredZarguna (When a first-rate intellectual like Samuel L. Jackson makes this kind of a video ... well ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Bullish
Trying to disprove the Creator is a fools errand.

Thus, the holy grail of liberals.
40 posted on 10/02/2012 2:16:29 AM PDT by 867V309
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas
well,atheism as noted by Solomon predates Solomon.

The Vedic religion allowed for some interpretations that there was no deity.

Essentially it states that karma defines everything -- and since there is karma, there is no need for a God as a governor. Furthermore it states that if God is an enforcer, God would be either egoistic or altruistic. Now, God's motives cannot be assumed to be altruistic because an altruistic God would not create a world so full of suffering. If his motives are assumed to be egoistic, then God must be thought to have desire, as agency or authority cannot be established in the absence of desire. However, assuming that God has desire would contradict God's eternal freedom which necessitates no compulsion in actions.

41 posted on 10/02/2012 2:18:54 AM PDT by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Essentially it states that karma defines everything -- and since there is karma, there is no need for a God as a governor. Furthermore it states that if God is an enforcer, God would be either egoistic or altruistic. Now, God's motives cannot be assumed to be altruistic because an altruistic God would not create a world so full of suffering. If his motives are assumed to be egoistic, then God must be thought to have desire, as agency or authority cannot be established in the absence of desire. However, assuming that God has desire would contradict God's eternal freedom which necessitates no compulsion in actions.

It's always entertaining when men try to understand God.
42 posted on 10/02/2012 2:24:55 AM PDT by 867V309
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

43 posted on 10/02/2012 2:30:40 AM PDT by Daffynition (Self-respect: the secure feeling that no one, as yet, is suspicious. ~ HLM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: All

Yes, one day science will disprove the existence of God, that day will be April 1st, 2893 and God will give science a big old whupping they won’t forget on April 2nd, 2893.

Any other questions?


44 posted on 10/02/2012 2:38:42 AM PDT by Peter ODonnell (E pluribus biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Peter ODonnell

Science is God showing Man a little leg then kicking back with a laugh until time to show some more.


45 posted on 10/02/2012 2:49:58 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Mitt who? I'm voting for Ryan.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

‘There was a group of scientists, and they were all sitting around discussing which one of them was going to go to God and tell him that they didn’t need him anymore.

‘One of the scientists volunteered and went to tell God he was no longer needed. The scientist says to God: “God, you know, a bunch of us have been thinking, and I’ve come to tell you that we really don’t need you anymore. I mean, we’ve been coming up with great theories and ideas, we’ve cloned sheep, and we’re on the verge of cloning humans. So as you can see, we really don’t need you.”

‘God nods understandingly and says, “I see. Well, no hard feelings. But before you go, let’s have a contest. What do you think?”

‘The scientist says, “Sure. What kind of contest?”

‘God replies, “A human-making contest where we make a human being.”

‘The scientist quickly agrees, “Sure! No problem.”

‘The scientist bends down and picks up a handful of dirt and says, “Okay, I’m ready!”

‘God shakes that divine head, “No, no, no…you go get your own dirt.”’


46 posted on 10/02/2012 3:11:13 AM PDT by TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed (Yahuah Yahusha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed

Just heard that joke from mynpastorvthe other day...;)

We were talking about educated fools and their wishful thinking and how stupid they were in not being able to understand that our knowledge is too limited and that our capabilities are too finite to be able to grasp how our very existence came to be. Here they are thinking that Christians believe God will be in a white robe flying around the sky in a chariot while we are thinking that He is an omnipotent being that does not have to travel from point A to B like we do, that He is the ultimate Scientist and Physician and has intellect far and above what any man can conceive. No, the educated fools aren’t thinking outside the box and being “intelligent”...lol


47 posted on 10/02/2012 3:52:24 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

I have tried that before here. Doesn’t work - too many creationists on FR that will never entertain the idea that God put a system in place for evolution.


48 posted on 10/02/2012 4:14:18 AM PDT by Codeflier (Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama - 4 democrat presidents in a row and counting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Codeflier

Isn’t that another form of creationism?

Evolution is pure chance right? Random mutation coupled with natural selection.

If you add in a dose of “God” in the mix - it is no longer random.


49 posted on 10/02/2012 4:21:43 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“Although cosmic mysteries remain, Sean Carroll, a theoretical cosmologist at the California Institute of Technology, says there’s good reason to think science will ultimately arrive at a complete understanding of the universe that leaves no grounds for God whatsoever.”

Book to follow, foundations of religion and science shaken by controversial new theory, ground breaking study, blah and more blah. Just a few a little details to be worked out like....like....where do they find these people?


50 posted on 10/02/2012 4:21:43 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson