Posted on 10/03/2012 3:31:22 PM PDT by Lucky9teen
“ALG President Bill Wilson called the technology “a break-through for the American people.”
Yes, of course, now this technology can be used in job interviews, welfare applications — OOPS, better call on the ACLU to spend our tax dollars to fight it!
Psycopathic liars do quite well with many lie detectors.
Let me guess...Obama will be telling the truth and Romney lying according to “official” results.
One major problem comes along with this type of technology when encountering sociopaths like Zero, because they actually believe every lie they tell themselves. It’s extremely difficult for us to detect chronic liars who make things up as they go. It could backfire on us, because Romney actually has a conscious and knows the truth.
What about the circumstance where the person being examined feels no stress in telling lies? He feels no moral compunction to be honest and therefore doesn’t show up as a liar on the detector?
Poly testing is good, but not infallible. A paranoid schizo and a few other psychos will sail right through.
One of my old bosses would fall straight into that class. He could change his story several times during a ten minute conversation.
“Let me guess...Obama will be telling the truth and Romney lying according to “official” results.”
Those results will be in before Halftime.
Join this technology with the woman that appears on the ORielly every now and then
I think it's just another tactic of the left. If so, it'll show Romney lying most of the time and, to try to show "fairness", Zero lying one or two times. It's all for the leftist pundits (who claim to be the "news" media) to help them in declaring Zero to be the debate winner.
After all, they already have their stories written (and I do mean "stories").
Obama is a habitual liar, so no test will work on him.
At least the ALG seem to be a right-of-center group, so it may not be all smoke and mirrors.
Won’t work on Nobama. He’s a pathological narcissist. He can beat the lie detectors.
In my opinion, she's sympathetic to democrat politicians. She always gives them the benefit of the doubt. Republicans usually have a good reading, but she always comes up with a "But....." that has no benefit of the doubt.
"I believe Hillary is being totally honest. That twitch is probably normal for her where it may not be for someone else. I'd ignore that twitch this time."
"Cheney believes what he says, BUT, see that twitch? That twitch always means a person is not really sure they're making a good decision. "
The same twitch, but a completely different reading depending on the persons political affiliation. Watch for it. You'll notice it now if you haven't before. She never slams a democrat. She always "pokes" a Republican in the end no matter what.
From the Tonight Show... Johnny Carson as a Politician Taking a Polygraph Test
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbWI9xIGba4
The voice analyzer will crash when it tries to detect all of Obama’s lies.
Hopefully, they'll all be compensated with real three dollar bills.
LOL
Yes, they certainly do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.