Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers

In 1795 the Naturalization Act from 1790 was changed and children born abroad to US citizen parents were considered as citizens (at birth). It is obvious that early legislators made distinction between the phrases: “citizen at birth” vs. “natural-born citizen”.

Why would they change the language of the law if two phrases had the same meaning?


95 posted on 10/07/2012 7:20:01 AM PDT by nosf40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: nosf40

Equivalent language is used all the time. And someone born abroad with 2 US citizen parents IS considered a NBC - see John McCain.


99 posted on 10/07/2012 8:36:35 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson