Posted on 10/08/2012 8:42:36 AM PDT by Altariel
Next you need to read (or reread) It Can’t Happen Here by Sinclair Lewis.
I may have to side with the FBI on this, because we are at war and America had agents taking pictures of key locations during WW2, and they too gave innocent reasons.
Better to err on the side of caution than to defend some bozo who had nothing better to do than gaze at clouds.
For those that still want to defend this guy be glad you are on the web and not withing arm reach of me.
Heap big mighty brave keyboard warrior* I suggest you read the constitution (probably for the first time) and get a grip as to what this country is about.
*Translates as "blowhard a$$hole"
I have a video I took while at Disneyland years ago, it was of an Arab looking person who was filming people, and how he later followed me and my family taking our pictures. He saw me taking an interest in him while he was filming people.
It was so scary I had to shorten our stay at the parks, now you still want to preach about rights?
You bet your backside I do. First off the guy was probably a perv rather than a terrorist considering what sorts are attracted to disney enterprises.
But secondly and far more importantly, you and every other citizen is at far greater risk from the loss of freedom by expanding the police powers of the government. Look at what happens to citizens when they abdicate personal responsibility to the government - The DDR, USSR, Cambodia, Nazi Germany, China under Mao, any number of African countries, Turkey, etc. Far more citizens have been murdered by their own governments in the last hundred years or so than were killed by any number of foreign attacks. We started down this road years ago with Waco and Ruby Ridge. Today if a cop kills a citizen it is extremely unlikely that the cop will face any consequences for that action, so I think it is far better to take some extremely slight risk that someone photographing a facility has some bad motivation that the further advance the police powers of the state.
May your chains rest on you lightly.
“It would boil down to if the person, in Public, in a crowd of other people had a reasonable expectation of privacy.”
*chuckle* We had a young lady show up at the helpdesk who wanted to see if we could get an off-campus, private website to take her picture down. Seems a few nights before, their hockey/baseball/whatever team had won/lost (I can’t be bothered to remember) and the students drank, rioted, burned dorm furniture, drank, broke windows, started bonfires, and drank. The young lady in question had, while sitting on her boyfriend’s (?) shoulders, removed her shirt — this while camera flashes had ALREADY been going off for a while. (There was video of the riot.)
The www.school-name-drunk.com site graciously took her photo down. Sober, she understood that we couldn’t force them to and that she had little expectation of (shirtless) privacy in a riot. Still, she worried “What if my parents see it?”
Other states’ laws may vary...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.