Skip to comments.
OK Jim and Mods, last night was a DOS Attack on FreeRepublic or was the server just slow...?!
12 Oct 2012
| US Navy Vet
Posted on 10/12/2012 12:17:02 PM PDT by US Navy Vet
Just Wondering?
TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 2012debates; dos; faq; freeerepublic
To: US Navy Vet
Never discount the Chicago Alinskyites and their Soros-funded allies.
2
posted on
10/12/2012 12:19:29 PM PDT
by
rfp1234
To: US Navy Vet
3
posted on
10/12/2012 12:20:51 PM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(Conservatism didn't magically show up in Romney's heart in 2012. You can't force what isn't in you.)
To: rfp1234
Debate traffic is my guess.
To: US Navy Vet
It was cause by huge numbers of FReepers donating to the Freepathon.
5
posted on
10/12/2012 12:21:41 PM PDT
by
Kartographer
("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
To: US Navy Vet; a fool in paradise; Slings and Arrows
I can believe it was an MS DOS attack!
6
posted on
10/12/2012 12:23:18 PM PDT
by
Revolting cat!
(Bad things are wrong!)
To: US Navy Vet
Well, honestly.. “last night was the a DOS Attack”...
No, last night “was the a” against you specifically.
Nobody likes you and you “was the a” ought to just bail out.
To: US Navy Vet
Asked and answered....
And see JR's reply.
8
posted on
10/12/2012 12:23:51 PM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: Kartographer
9
posted on
10/12/2012 12:24:20 PM PDT
by
VaRepublican
(I would propagate taglines but I don't know how. But bloggers do.)
To: Carpe Cerevisi
I think that as well...I had the same problem accessing FR during the 1st Presidential Debate.
10
posted on
10/12/2012 12:24:36 PM PDT
by
halo66
To: rfp1234
It never ceases to surprise me that people see a busy website, know the website is busy, and wonder if it's a DOS attack.
11
posted on
10/12/2012 12:25:14 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: US Navy Vet
DUmmieLand was slow as well...but not as slow as FR.
12
posted on
10/12/2012 12:26:04 PM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
(Ambassador Stevens Is Dead And The Chevy Volt Is Alive)
To: VaRepublican
No, no. The servers are already bought and paid for.
Installing them? THAT’s a whole new subject.
13
posted on
10/12/2012 12:28:08 PM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: US Navy Vet; Jim Robinson
a) An intelligible headline can often make all the difference in readership.
b) Yes, for whatever reason, the board was glacially slow last night.
c) Mash here for last night's post re the situation, from Jim.
14
posted on
10/12/2012 12:29:18 PM PDT
by
tomkat
(lamp posts are just the right height for journ0lists)
To: VaRepublican
be careful what you wish for!

15
posted on
10/12/2012 12:32:13 PM PDT
by
Kartographer
("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
To: Gay State Conservative
My FR seemed to be out for a while and I tried other sites and found them working then after an hour FR worked. I would like to know more if anyone knows.
16
posted on
10/12/2012 12:32:18 PM PDT
by
tommix2
(,)
To: US Navy Vet
I noticed for “peak times” like debates and elections, the server here is slow. No big deal.
To: US Navy Vet
It was cause by some video Jim up loaded on You Tube. ;-)
18
posted on
10/12/2012 12:35:12 PM PDT
by
Kartographer
("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
To: US Navy Vet
FWIW:
In USG parlance, DOS = Department of State!
19
posted on
10/12/2012 12:39:29 PM PDT
by
Hawthorn
To: Carpe Cerevisi
Debate traffic is my guess. That was my guess. It was slow, but my posts got through--which probably wouldn't have happened in a DOS attack.
20
posted on
10/12/2012 12:42:16 PM PDT
by
Fiji Hill
(Deo Vindice!)
To: VaRepublican
Could be that we need larger pipes.
21
posted on
10/12/2012 12:44:20 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: US Navy Vet
Actually, as I pointed out last night and was barely able to post my opinion, enraging one semi-literate (since 1998) in the process, it was the stupid vanities about the slow response that caused it!
22
posted on
10/12/2012 12:44:30 PM PDT
by
Revolting cat!
(Bad things are wrong!)
To: Paladin2
I think we should paint flames on the servers.
That should help.
23
posted on
10/12/2012 12:51:39 PM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: humblegunner
"...No, last night was the a against you specifically. Nobody likes you and you was the a ought to just bail out." LMAO!!! You're still one of the funniest ____ers on FR.
;-\
24
posted on
10/12/2012 12:55:41 PM PDT
by
Gargantua
("Barbie O'Bunga ~ America's First Fly-Strewn Fag President")
To: US Navy Vet; Jim Robinson
Maybe just some joking on this thread, but DOS stands for Denial of Service as well as MS DOS.
FWIW, Jim has always been reluctant to answer the question as to whether there has been a DOS attack. Presumably that’s to avoid encouraging hackers. It’s hard to believe that nasty lib hackers don’t do it from time to time, preferably when the site is most needed. But also, I imagine there were a ton of people showing up to discuss how the debate was going. This was about the only site that was available during the debate, since Drudge seems to hold back on evaluation until the debate is over, and few of the media sites can be trusted.
I was unable to get in several times, and then when I got in I could only get the first page of the debate discussion thread, but not the later ones, and then when I finally got that, I was unable to post anything. I imagine that that was one very busy thread.
As for the Forum format, personally I like it very much, and would be unhappy to see it changed. By contrast, Yahoo Groups FR2 is really clunky, as are most other discussion formats, IMHO. And FR stores and makes available huge amounts of information, unlike most sites which cut out all the older stuff to slim things down.
Certainly one solution would be for more people to donate. I know that times are very tough, but if more people gave at least a little, that would do the trick.
I don’t think Jim could use anyone else to host it, because the flying monkeys would put pressure on them to close it down, as they have done with other sites they dislike. And also because the identity of the users needs to be kept secret from outsiders, unless they choose to reveal it themselves for some reason, and I don’t think you can trust most hosts if, say, the FBI comes around to the back door and demands the data.
25
posted on
10/12/2012 12:59:04 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: humblegunner
I blame it on blog pimps.
26
posted on
10/12/2012 12:59:40 PM PDT
by
Starstruck
(Looking into the abyss.)
To: Starstruck
I blame it on blog pimps. Damned straight.
To: US Navy Vet
I think it's because I forgot to turn off my italics in 1999.
I've never forgiven myself for that.
To: rfp1234
Traffic flood, likely. Had a couple of “No server” pages, but same as 1st debate, lots of pingin goin on.
29
posted on
10/12/2012 1:06:49 PM PDT
by
X-spurt
(It is truly time for ON YOUR FEET or on your knees)
To: Revolting cat!
LOL He did seem rather down on you.
To: US Navy Vet
31
posted on
10/12/2012 1:19:53 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: tomkat
We used to call “swap ‘til it stops”...monkey repair.
32
posted on
10/12/2012 1:20:49 PM PDT
by
Roccus
To: US Navy Vet
All I know is that it was Hugh and Series, probably a stuned beeber!
33
posted on
10/12/2012 1:25:48 PM PDT
by
2nd Amendment
(Vote Obama for national suicide)
To: Madame Dufarge
I think it's because I forgot to turn off my italics in 1999

That damned <marquee> still churning away on some long forgotten chat thread, eating all our bandwidth alive from the inside !
34
posted on
10/12/2012 1:29:46 PM PDT
by
tomkat
To: US Navy Vet
It was all those cat people, again.
35
posted on
10/12/2012 1:31:27 PM PDT
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: Carpe Cerevisi
Exactly. A whole lot of people were trying to access last night at the same time. I waited on Twitter until late before I came here because I knew it would be like this.
36
posted on
10/12/2012 1:35:50 PM PDT
by
UltraV
(I use the term Leftist not liberal, because a true liberal would not support government censorship.)
To: US Navy Vet
FReeper Nation by Jim and the ModsP-p-p-people try to put us d-d-d-down.
Chorus: T-t-t-talkin' 'bout our FReeper Nation.
Just because our site goes down.
Chorus: T-t-t-talkin' 'bout our FReeper Nation.
Hope I can post before I die.
Chorus: T-t-t-talkin' 'bout our FReeper Nation.
Got to expose another DemRat lie.
Chorus: T-t-t-talkin' 'bout our FReeper Nation.
Just talkin' 'bout our FReeper Nation.
It's our FReeper Nation, baby!
.
.
Some pathetic Limey band todally ripped them off.
37
posted on
10/12/2012 1:37:27 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
To: UltraV
A whole lot of people were trying to access last night at the same time.Yes, even Captain Obvious was here!
38
posted on
10/12/2012 1:38:46 PM PDT
by
Revolting cat!
(Bad things are wrong!)
To: Revolting cat!; UltraV
A whole lot of people were trying to access last night at the same time.Yes, even Captain Obvious was here!
You got it all figured out.
Thursday, October 11, 2012 10:32:09 PM · 1,169 of 1,267
Jim Robinson to CedarDave; RedMDer; bert; don-o; John Robinson; All
John was monitoring the system during tonights debate. Still has not specifically IDd the bottleneck.
Here was his response when I asked what was happening:
Database is nearly completely idle (0.25 load average) and web servers arent very busy. I dont know why its screwed up. It doesnt make sense. It must be a network problem.
I saw myself that the load average was not high and that the cpus were mostly idle all night. I asked him if it could be a DOS attack or a configuration problem and he said could be. Hed look into it. Said the system was not overloaded and it would be a shame to buy a new database server and not solve the problem.
Im in favor of swapping out the system a piece at a time until the bottleneck is found, but thats just me. Dont know what Johns going to do.
39
posted on
10/12/2012 1:42:12 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
To: rfp1234
Never discount Occam’s razor. More people wanted access and the servers couldn’t handle it. No need to add a boogeyman when a more logical explanation suffices.
40
posted on
10/12/2012 1:42:34 PM PDT
by
UltraV
(I use the term Leftist not liberal, because a true liberal would not support government censorship.)
To: Kartographer
To: tomkat
Look, I feel bad enough as it is; no need to rub salt in the wound.
Just call me Typhoid DuFarge.
To: Madame Dufarge
You can never
really close the italians.

They fight back.
43
posted on
10/12/2012 2:05:36 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
To: Liberty Valance
Making the system look like it’s going downhill (jack up the rear end) could help too. Taking the muffler out of the system would help too.
44
posted on
10/12/2012 4:21:31 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: fieldmarshaldj
Your right,I never connected that before...Victor Newman
45
posted on
10/12/2012 8:55:58 PM PDT
by
Harold Shea
(RVN `70 - `71)
To: TigersEye
Maron!!!
I need a sit-down!!
To: Madame Dufarge
Where’s da profit in HTML? Dat’s all I’m sayin’.
47
posted on
10/13/2012 12:56:23 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson