Skip to comments.Was "Real Conservative" Michael May on ABC's This Week a FAKE?
Posted on 10/14/2012 1:30:49 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
Was supposed "real conservative" Michael May of Brea, CA whose video appeared on ABC's This Week a fake? Why do I ask? Besides the absurdity of a supposed Republican claiming to vote for a Democrat president (Obama) for the first time there was the terminology he used---"neoconservative." That is the type of terminology that DUmmies at the Democrat Underground use. Here is a transcript:
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
(UNKNOWN): Like a lot of Republicans who are real conservatives, not the neoconservatives that we see today, I'm concerned about where the GOP is going. Debates did nothing to change my opinion of Mitt Romney or the strategy of the Republican Party. And so for the first time in my life, I'm going the vote for a Democrat.
TAPPER (voice-over): That was Michael May (ph) of Brea, California. He was not the only one who said a debate has not changed his vote. Nicole Nichols does her own research, because she believes the candidates only say in debates what they think we want to hear.
I am very familiar with DUmmie terminology and his use of the term "neoconservative" set off alarm bells with me.
I smell Axelrod. This is nothing more than astro turf. Hey Axe, kiss my ass-tro tutf!
Sounds like a Paulbot.
That was my very first thought exactly!!! I hope someone can do some "research" on this guy.....
A Paulbot wouldn’t be voting for Obama.
I wonder if that’s his real name?
We all knew once Romney commanded a lead the false flags would come out. They are coming out daily now.
A press release from the DNC has more intellectual credibility then anything ABC News puts out these days.
A “conservative Republican” voting for Obama? LOL! Either the boy isn’t very bright or he’s a liar. I suspect he’s the latter.
btw, the whole thing is basically a pretense.
>>A Paulbot wouldnt be voting for Obama.
Some Paulbots are just Liberaltarians—disaffected young adults who want to be Liberals, but are smart enough to see how destructive they are. They still believe their professors at college and think that Conservatives want to enslave blacks, impregnate women, and repeal child labor laws.
So, they become Ronulans during the primaries in an attempt to get “two good progressives” on the ticket (they think that Paul is progressive because he favors legalizing weed and shutting down the military).
“neoconservative” is also an epithet used by the tin foil hat crowd.
Clearly not a term I would use in reference to Romney or Ryan. To the loony left it usually refers to pro Israel Republicans.
Appalling, isn’t it
If it is true, he’s prolly a log cabin type.
Please be careful how loud you say that, as JR would like anyone with half a brain to vote 3rd party.
Mitt is the Anti-Christ, you know?
I wonder how badly this bozo’s appearance on the leftwing abc This Week is going to hurt Romney’s chances of winning Cauliphonya. LOL! This revelation by a “conservative Cauliphonya Republican” is probably the nail in the coffin for Mitt’s chance of winning the golden state. LOL! Funny stuff.
If May is a Stanford professor he is a hardcore dem-o-rat. shows him in Pleasanton, CA.
The person is voting Democratic because he doesn’t like the direction the GOP is going in?
RON PAUL SUPPORTER PRIMER:
(credit goes to RaceBannon)
#1. Be Arrogant
#2. Be Condescending
#3. Be self-important
#4. Be self-righteous
#5. Tout your superior intellect to help overcome your lack of self-confidence (see numbers 1, 2, 3 and 4 then go straight to #15).
#6. Give slippery rhetorical answers to straight questions
#7. Hide/Ignore or spin Ron Pauls congressional record of 23 Years in Congress, creating 620 bills of which 4 made it to the floor and only one became law.
#8. When cornered and have no truthful or direct response, spout angry, non-topic rhetoric as an answer, then see #19.
#9. Hide your Democrat voting status from the public & pretend youre a Republican.
#10. Blame everyone else, never take credit for a problem like Barack Obama because we are closet Ultra-Liberals
#11. Berate and/or belittle your opponent whenever losing an argument, then see #19
#12. Blame America for the world hating the US and act like an Arab Psychiatrist/Pathologist when promoting the 9/11 Jihad conspiracy.
#13. Be courteous and direct others to their local cable or satellite channel that carries reruns of Conspiracy theory with Jesse You deserve to lose a few Ventura.
#14. Copy and paste data from whatever unreliable source you can find to try and validate your argument.
#15. Avoid/ignore any or all valid retort or facts that invalidate your agenda at all costs or whenever possible. (Go back to #6)
#16. Create a fictitious Facebook persona to hide your true identity like our Anarchist/OWS cousins.
#17. Make cowardly drive-by hit and run comment and/or like a fellow Paulbots hit and run comment.
#18. Bait adversaries by commenting/posting irrelevant points and/or points you were making during your last debate with someone totally different on another topic all together without looking like you are arguing with yourself. Try to avoid looking foolish at all costs.
#19. Scurry over to your nearest Ron Paul thread and alert other bots to join you and that you require assistance because youre losing your delusional Liberal arguments. Then medicate, repeat, put on your drool bib and go back to marching in the paper slipper brigade.
#20. Follow #18 and 19 to the letter, then surround your opponent and take cheap pot-shots from your behind your fictitious Facebook persona (See #9 and #16).
#21. Before debating, avoid getting fecal matter in or behind your ears when removing your head from your rectum. This will be particularly useful when listening to CDs of Dr Paul in your Toyota Prius.
#22. When casting your ballot for Dr Paul during online polls, remember to clear your cookies then repeat. Do this as many times as your fingers will allow or until the next episode of Colbert Reports, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, or your Mother calls down to the basement stairs to tell you that dinner is ready.
“Neo-conservative” gets tossed around a good deal on FR.
I dislike the term, as it has no precise meaning any longer, and is generally used as a variant of Orwell’s definition of “fascist” as “something bad.”
“Sounds like a Paulbot.”
The “neo-conservative” as a swearword is a specialty of the Paul-tards and also their pals on the anti-war left who try to ‘infiltrate’ the right wing and spread dissension through divisive denigration of other conservatives and Republicans.
You’d have to be dumb as a rock to claim to be in any way libertarian, a ‘conservative’, for freedom, etc. and miss NOT ONLY Republican Mitt Romney on the ticket but the other 3rd party protest votes ) etc. and going for the most anti-freedom person EVER on the ballot for President. Such people are either liars or too stupid to be all
This is like an Episcopalian complaining about his pastor being not theologically sound and then deciding to go to a church headed by Satan.
That's certianly my definition!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.