Posted on 10/17/2012 1:52:25 PM PDT by combat_boots
Post-debate #2, with the Ilk!
Say it ain’t so!
‘terror attack’ used by 0bama simply meant ‘fear’ and ‘tragic’ as is used by Progressives.
The Libya attack was murder and assassination.
Now, we have Crowley backtracking. ‘Definition of is is.’
Nonspecific on any of the wording omuzzie used. Can’t diss mad mo.
So, the word ‘terror’ refers to general attacks, not Benghazi.
“Statement by the President on the Attack in Benghazi
I strongly condemn the outrageous attack on our diplomatic facility in Benghazi, which took the lives of four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens. Right now, the American people have the families of those we lost in our thoughts and prayers. They exemplified America’s commitment to freedom, justice, and partnership with nations and people around the globe, and stand in stark contrast to those who callously took their lives.
I have directed my Administration to provide all necessary resources to support the security of our personnel in Libya, and to increase security at our diplomatic posts around the globe. While the United States rejects efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others, we must all unequivocally oppose the kind of senseless violence that took the lives of these public servants.
On a personal note, Chris was a courageous and exemplary representative of the United States. Throughout the Libyan revolution, he selflessly served our country and the Libyan people at our mission in Benghazi. As Ambassador in Tripoli, he has supported Libya’s transition to democracy. His legacy will endure wherever human beings reach for liberty and justice. I am profoundly grateful for his service to my Administration, and deeply saddened by this loss.
The brave Americans we lost represent the extraordinary service and sacrifices that our civilians make every day around the globe. As we stand united with their families, let us now redouble our own efforts to carry their work forward.
Watch the Video
President Obama Speaks on the Attack on BenghaziSeptember 12, 2012 11:38 AM
President Obama Speaks on the Attack on Benghazi”
Timeline of video being the cause.
The media is now changing history, along with the President.
Hey! 0bama lies! So does Biden!
Applause!
“He never will admit the real answer, and that is why this President is a clear and present danger to the Republic.”
“exemplified freedom and justice” (in 0bama’s statement)
“peace and justice” = MB’s party.
(wadding up copy of the WH statement)
Oh! Hooray! We had to close yet another embassy today.
At this point I am prepping for a bug out. I’m spitting distance from filthadelphia and hopefully will be able to leave before the SHTF.
“On September 20 — eight days after Obama claims to have called the Benghazi attack an “act of terror” — Jay Carney affirmed to reporters that the White House had never called it “a terrorist attack.”
From the gaggle on Air Force One, en route to Miami, 9/20/2012:
Q: Can you — have you called it a terrorist attack before? Have you said that?
MR. CARNEY: I haven’t, but — I mean, people attacked our embassy. It’s an act of terror by definition.
Q: Yes, I just hadn’t heard you —
MR. CARNEY: It doesn’t have to do with what date it occurred.
Q: No, I just hadn’t heard the White House say that this was an act of terrorism or a terrorist attack. And I just —
MR. CARNEY: I don’t think the fact that we hadn’t is not — as our NCTC Director testified yesterday, a number of different elements appear to have been involved in the attack, including individuals connected to militant groups that are prevalent in eastern Libya, particularly in the Benghazi area. We are looking at indications that individuals involved in the attack may have had connections to al Qaeda or al Qaeda’s affiliates, in particular al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb.
Here, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney actually affirmed Gov. Romney’s position that the White House did not call the Benghazi attack an act of terrorism. Carney also said the now infamous video “precipitated some of the unrest in Benghazi” the day before. “
But hey. 0bama is clean and neat. And he talks, reads, and is a practiced rhetoretician/communist agitator.
Uh.
Yes. Get prepped and ready to roll.
Stu Antoinette.
OMG! I worry about Stu.
Beck can’t take the 0bama statement on free enterprise.
Stutistics.
Most of the world believes that the State is there to take care/eliminate need.
The US prefers freedom and responsibility for our own outcomes.
I down with the sheer gloves and fan.
Religion is important in the US, cf Europe.
Hard to take Stu serious in that costume.
Should be I am.
The minuet, well, not so much.
It’s a bit like Globe Theatre men being Juliet....
We DO need the levity every now and then.
You know, 0bama said, “they not only represent the US, but they work for me.” This referred to Foreign Service people. I felt like he thinks himself separated from the US.
We have blackboards!
0bama at the debate
Gas $$
Food $$
Value of homes $$
So 2008!
Do YOU trust the media? Are YOU one of the 8%?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.