Skip to comments.Obama already knew Kerry Ladka who asked a question about Benghazi at the debate
Posted on 10/18/2012 11:36:10 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
click here to read article
Yet more proof the whole thing was an Obama/CNN setup.
Ok, that’s pretty convincing.
as always...Fake, Fraud. and phony.
We need to know if Obama had the questions in advance. It was not presented this way.
yeah I think its obvious to ANYONE with a brain that the questions and “undecided” voters were all hand picked in advance. Of course this guy knows Obama, but you know what..that ONE question about Libya has put the whole scandal into the forefront and will destroy Obama..Libya is NOT something they want to discuss
Moderator Candy Crowley had probably carefully stacked the deck, then by a back channel, had provided the clues for Obama to have his answers sharpened up.
The more amazing, Mitt Romney was countering most of this fancy dodge-and-weave on the spot, not only quickly, but acquitting himself well most the time.
One would think that Obama and Crowley would have worked out the stagecraft a little more convincingly.
They set that up big time.
Even planned Michele to lead the cheering.
All for a lie. Knowing the MSM would back up their lie. Knowing the sheeple might have forgotten all about any Youtube video
I knew the minute i watched..he was a total plant. everything about that little kabuki scene was scripted. i just thought O got tripped up by his name, thinking it was a women.
There sure seems to be a lot of random coincidences surrounding the 0.
I sent it to Drudge. We’ll see if he’ll follow-up on it.
It is interesting.
“The more amazing, Mitt Romney was countering most of this fancy dodge-and-weave on the spot, not only quickly, but acquitting himself well most the time.”
As Rush said, we have to remember that for the past 20-30 years, every Republican has won strictly because of his ideas, and with all of the media thwarting him along the way. People like the ideas; it’s just a matter of dodging the commie press and getting out the word.
Hand-picked audience, pre-selected questions and the referee in his pocket and he still screws it up.
As my father used to say: "That man could F-up a wet dream."
Thx for that link.:-)
Someone send this to Drudge ASAP!!!
Was advised by a FRiend of this very discovery, and intended to break this news to FR and the world, but have been beaten to the punch. Oh well. :)
Happy it is out there. I also have a few more observations that back the thesis that Kerry was a plant and that Candy Boo Boo Child was complicit in the selection of the plant.
Those WILL appear in the editorial tomorrow, should the additional observations not be posted already.
Yes,but they can not simply avoid it. However, they can try to control it and get the best possible outcome out of it.
Even though it flopped.
Mostly because Romney didn’t back down.
I sent this to The Blaze.
I just do not understand how they think people would have totally forgotten those 2 weeks. Just because the MSM backs him up doesn’t mean people would really forget.
BTW... I hope you save this to your hd!
Agreed about Drudge, but if we are to get our ducks in a row, we should assemble ALL the evidence, and I suspect one or two additions can be made. Let me doublecheck I am not thinking of the wrong questioner... if I am, Drudge can hear immediately.
Yet, the CodePink media coordinator or some such was debunked right away. ??? Red herring?
Candy Boo Boo Child
Irrefutable evidence of collusion between the “moderator” and Obama. He knew the questioner in advance, and thus presumably knew the question.
Replayed it 3x; UN-FRICKING-BELIEVEABLE! Scripted right to the individual step and each word!
GET ON IT, DRUDGE! (not that it’ll ever be seen or heard by the GP)
Watch it. You will see what a fake phoney fraud the “debate” was.
Uh...Holy ****ing ****!
Is all I can say.
That is quite illustrative.
I suppose that this is how Mr. Axlehole was able to predict Obama’s “strong” performance in advance.
What’s funny is that Obama still lost and is incapable of winning even when the entire deck was stacked in advance in his favor.
Mr. Obama, you are a worthless piece of human garbage.
This IS interesting. 0 knows exactly where the next question is coming from, in the "randomly" seated audience. He even mutters the guys name, all before the crappy head-fake/whatsyername BS.
I recall three of them being adjacent to each other.
Random my arse...
This guy IS the guy I am thinking of. There are other factors I wish to relay to Drudge, but let me put them out here, instead of an editorial:
1) The obvious attempt to portray Kerry Ladka as a business owner, who are traditionally Republicans. Why would someone waste precious time explaining their own background? No one in the audience or nationwide would possibly care.
2) A puff piece about a private conversation occuring between Kerry Ladka and the President appeared (originally) in the Washington Post, but is presently only located (to my knowledge) in a FoxNewsInsider article. Take a moment to digest the demeanor of this article. It fairly glows in support of Obama, and Kerry Ladka is the primary filament from which this glow emanates.
Please circulate these two additional indicators to Drudge, in order to ensure that the complete story is sent to Matt.
>>> President Obama moved (physically walked) directly toward Kerry Ladka, and said Hi Kerry, (but oddly Kerry had not moved, nor identified himself)
Obama said “Hi Kerry” is not so weird. CC already said the next question is from Kerry, Keryy Ladka.
The physically walking is coincident? No, I don’t have explanation.
But just this clip is not a proof that this is a set up.
The corruption and criminality is so widespread and so deep, it’s a miracle every time a Republican manages to win an election.
It's all about serving others. It's hard sometimes, cuz I'm still human. But I gotta do what's right. GET THIS WHOLE PACKAGE TO DRUDGE OR BRIETBART ASAP!!!!
This is serious scoop material.
i got the impression he was using the forum to plug his biz. Hmmmmmmmmm.
You hit GOLD here.
I haven’t looked but in these debates the next questioner is usually handed and holding a microphone. Was this Kerry guy already holding it?
Please assist. Backtrack to my points, then to top of thread, then circulate to highest level people you can find. This is a probable exposure of a serious scandal in the second debate. Thanks bro.
Only problem with this is that Mitt looks over at Kerry also, right when O does......but we noticed early on in the debate Kandy referred to Romney as Romley. Anyone else catch this?
It made the transcript (so far):
MS. CROWLEY: — I want you to talk to Carey Ladka (ph), who wants to switch the topic for us.
THE PRESIDENT: Okay. Hi, Carey.
Q: Good evening, Mr. President.
THE PRESIDENT: I’m sorry, what’s your name?
Q: It’s Carey. Carey Ladka (ph).
THE PRESIDENT: Great to see you, Carey.
He walked in his direction, looked right at him, and said hi kerry, then looked around to cover his mistake and asked what his name was again.
Just why do people contribute to the RNC, if we have to watch our guy be broad-sided every single effing debate? So basically there weren’t any legitimate questions? I know the first chick forgot the fifth part of her question, had to pull the notes from her pocket and read it ( she identified it as being the most important one to her.) Then we have the code pink babe who thinks with her parts rather than smarts. Benghazi n F&F were losers because bama-mama saved him. Really, was their one beneficial question for Romney?
This would disprove the scandal. Crowley would have mentioned the name before Obama. We need Obama showing knowledge of the name before anyone else. Do we have that?
To play devil’s advocate (literally? lol), an argument could be made that Candy appeared to motion her head to her left (essentially indicating “over thatta way)” as she began to introduce the new questioner. Obama then started over to that side, yet when Kerry hesitated in getting up (perhaps not sure when he was supposed to so) Obama started looking around to see if he had misunderstood where the question was supposed to be coming from.
bump for later.