Skip to comments.VANITY - Can/Will Romney "Unconcede"?
Posted on 11/10/2012 8:32:49 AM PST by melissa_in_ga
It's been almost a week since the de-lection, and various posts have popped up showing unrealistic numbers for NObama in Virginia, Florida and Ohio. We all know massive voter fraud was in play in this election - the Chicago way.
Question: Can Romney pull his concession speech based on the data from polling centers? Can he ask for a recount? And if he could...would he?
I wonder why the SOS in the states with jiggered precinct numbers are not taking it upon themselves to make sure the count is accurate, that only registered voters voted and were recorded correctly.
Are the SOS in OH and PA Rats?
Gore did it in 2000....see where it got him? Romney needs to just take his millions and be a liberal somewhere else. This is our time to regroup and pick a conservative next time around. We have 2014 to start getting our act for.
i can see why this is a vanity. Nobody would ever publish it.
You want a recount in Ohio? Based on what, specifically? You could do an academic research project. Start with one precinct. Were there illegal voters on the rolls? Did people fraudulently vote, claiming to be someone they were not? Did somebody manipulate the machines?
What is it? EXACTLY!! STATE YOUR THESIS PRECISELY AND WITH SPECIFICS. Who, what, where, when, how. Find one example first and they start your projective geometry delusion onto the whole county.
there was ‘massive voter fraud” in my hometown. The Government/AForBambi conglomerate found 2000 new Latinos on food stamps and got them registered and then mobilized them to vote. 2000 new votes. COMMUNITY ORGANIZING.
If Romney loves this Country, then he should unconceede and demand a recount.
ONLY if he pays for it. I hope you wouldn’t be for taxpayers paying for it. I knew this guy was the wrong candidate from day one.
You mean just like Romney went after Obama on Libya in the third debate? Oh, wait.....he didn’t.
The moral highground gets us nowhere but stranded on an island. Send out the attack dogs and demand a recount in ALL the swing states. This is WAR.
Otherwise, it's hard to make the case that Romney would have won had the election been fairer.
Countercharges (true or false) will be made by the Democrats and the challenge wouldn't go very far.
Even if Romney did - what will that do? Will it change the outcome?
He would be mocked and ridiculed. If we were talking about one state that made the difference, then you might have a point, but since this is about needing two or three states to win, it just isn’t going to happen. The dems would only “find” more votes to keep the election results as they are now.
It would matter.
All of our elections have some level of fraud. This one had MASSIVE Fraud.
This was very much stolen.
I will not sit around with the rest of the conservatives believing we lost this based on a bad candidate, or bad principles.
We lost this because these thieves stole it.
Bumping this thread in the hopes of waking many FReepers up.
Yeah, better save that money for the Obamaphone crowd.
The Government/AForBambi conglomerate found 2000 new Latinos on food stamps and got them registered and then mobilized them to vote.
That doesn’t sound illegal to me UNLESS they are illegal which could be but tough to prove.
Is allegations of voter fraud, ect some form of coping mechanism for some people after their side loses an election?
I have no doubt there were some instances of voter fraud and wrong doing, but I’m sure it didn’t happen on the scale necessary to turn an entire national election.
Sadly, 0bamatard won, just as he did last time. Romney lost. Many of the folks on our side apparently didn’t come to the party. This country is gonna rightly deserve whatever it gets! Now, lets all move on, shall we.
Forget it....that would be too impolite, not gentlemanly.
The PA SOS is a Republican, but its become rather clear that the State GOP in Harrisburg is still the same bunch of cowards that will let the Philly Rats do whatever they want.
Was there voting fraud? Yes. There always is. Does voting fraud benefit Democrats? Yes. It always does. Was there enough fraud to affect the outcome of this election? No. Romney lost because he was the candidate nobody really wanted. Don't believe me? Go read the posts on this very forum from a few months ago where we had a "No Romney! No Way!" banner in bold red every time you clicked here.
Well hopefully those Obama Phone people are going to get a wake up call one day when there is seriously no money left. Probably not tomorrow, but the day of reckoning is coming.
“Can he ask for a recount? And if he could...would he?”
I think in a lot of places there is nothing to recount; they can just re-tabulate the machines that were rigged in advance.
Not going to happen. Move on.
Conceding doesn’t mean much. In a few weeks the SoS’s in the various states will do that for him.
This is not about dealing with it.
Nor is it about a bad candidate.
This was about MASSIVE voting fraud.On a scale we have never seen before.
This election was very much stolen in the swing states.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.