Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FYI: Congress had a slight oversight and didn't provide the necessary budgeting for the Fed exchanges (ooopsie). Feds were hoping to coerce the states (incentives) to become a "partner" in state-run exchanges only to dump their costs on the states at a future date.

Heineman saw the trap and refused to participate. With the current mood the legislature/state, forming a state exchange is not on the docket. There might even be a statute (most likely petition driven) to forbid any future attempts for a state exchange.

1 posted on 11/15/2012 2:57:05 PM PST by Kolath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kolath
"(won't be a partner-n-crime with the Feds)"

Read it again. He says he WILL "be a partner in crime"

2 posted on 11/15/2012 3:25:20 PM PST by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kolath

Headlines don’t match the article, in fact the article is 180 degrees off of the headlines.


4 posted on 11/15/2012 6:52:20 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson