Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

First they came for our unarmed dogs, but I did not complain, for I was not an unarmed dog.

Then they came for an unarmed 18 year old woman.....

1 posted on 11/18/2012 8:37:59 PM PST by Altariel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Altariel

Maybe the home was being used as an underground studio for the production of anti-mohammed videos.


2 posted on 11/18/2012 8:41:44 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

Nothing to see here, citizens, move along...............


3 posted on 11/18/2012 8:44:20 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel
Hughley said he didn't know what the search warrant was for,...

This is your lawless nation now, 0bama voters. All the karma of it is on you now.

4 posted on 11/18/2012 8:51:59 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

There could be compelling reasons for this raid —maybe they thought the daughter was one of a few journalists ASKING QUESTIONS about stuff, like the prez, maybe.

I’m thinking maybe that’s why he opened fire.


5 posted on 11/18/2012 8:56:34 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

I don’t know the backstory, but I’m surprised there isn’t even any claim of “incorrect address”.

It doesn’t even sound like any police or “authorities” even checked on the house and occupants 1st, with a knock then or beforehand.

Strange, further that they don’t say anything about why such a raid - no claims of drugs, anything?


6 posted on 11/18/2012 8:58:59 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

Assuming Hughley’s telling the truth, doesn’t the homeowner get to know what the warrant is for? Don’t they show him at some point?

If an FBI agent/SWAT member shoots seven times at someone, shouldn’t he hit her with more than a brick chip?

Why the hell do we have a stupid War on Drugs anyway?

So law enforcement can pull crap like this and get the big budgets, I guess.


7 posted on 11/18/2012 9:10:27 PM PST by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

‘Spose one of them signed some kind of petition or something?


9 posted on 11/18/2012 9:30:31 PM PST by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

Former service members: hide your daughters.


10 posted on 11/18/2012 9:37:22 PM PST by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (I will fear no muslim))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

It’s just collateral damage in the War on Drugs.

Personally, I think the FBI shooter and the moron who shouted “gun” should have to get on his/her knees, bow before father and daughter, and beg for forgiveness.

The only good thing in this story is that the FBI couldn’t shoot straight. They do excel in surveillance, though, but only when it involves somebody’s sex life. They flunked out in that regard in this case as well.


11 posted on 11/18/2012 10:06:48 PM PST by Skepolitic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

Everyone in this country is in danger of being attacked by the government. A government that is no longer “by the people”. It should be changed to read “of the people, by the idiots”.


12 posted on 11/18/2012 10:22:00 PM PST by Terry Mross (I haven't watched the news since the election. Someone ping me if anything big happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

They should all lose their jobs and the shooter tried for attempted murder.

There is no excuse for this.

The people should be allowed to personally sue criminal police personally, so that cops and FBI goons could lose their homes if they harm an innocent, unarmed civilian.. These wretched clowns get away with far too much.


14 posted on 11/19/2012 12:48:50 AM PST by Bon mots (Abu Ghraib: 47 Times on the front page of the NY Times | Benghazi: 2 Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salamander

Forget a “chicken in every pot”, what America clearly needs is “an armed Doberman at every door”.

What say you?


19 posted on 11/19/2012 6:49:38 AM PST by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

Maybe she was in a dog suit.


21 posted on 11/19/2012 11:50:05 AM PST by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson