Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Petition Asking Supreme Court To Define "Natural Born Citizen"
KheSanh ^ | November 11, 2012 | KheSanh

Posted on 11/19/2012 2:11:58 PM PST by KheSanh

A petition asking the Supreme Court to give a clear concise definition of the term "Natural Born Citizen".

Whitehouse.gov url to obtain the first 150 signatures:

http://wh.gov/9dpd


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Education; History
KEYWORDS: advisoryopinion; birthcertificate; certifigate; constitution; naturalborncitizen; obama; unclearontheconcept
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-326 next last

1 posted on 11/19/2012 2:12:07 PM PST by KheSanh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KheSanh

Exercises in futility are so much fun.


2 posted on 11/19/2012 2:13:49 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the psychopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KheSanh

Better late than never, I suppose, but futile.

Barack Obama’s election and subsequent reelection have forever changed the meaning of the term “natural born”.


3 posted on 11/19/2012 2:16:37 PM PST by SandyInSeattle (2 Corinthians 4:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

We sure need some here.
FReepathon Day 50!

4 posted on 11/19/2012 2:19:24 PM PST by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KheSanh

There is no need for another stupid petition!!!

Congress itself, LED BY THE DEMOCRATS defined it in TOTAL in 2008 when they held a hearing on John McCain’s eligibility.

In that full congressional hearing, BOTH John McCain’s birthplace was examined, as well as the citizenship of BOTH his parents.

The Democrats ALREADY settled this for us!

Why are we not forcing Boehner to apply the same congressional hearing to Obama that was applied to McCain???

It would be LIGHTS OUT for Obama, and a reset back to the beginning of this constitutional crisis in 2008.


5 posted on 11/19/2012 2:21:00 PM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle

SOCIALIST DEMOCRAT DEFINITION:

Any ANTI AMERICAN person that can produce a FAKE BIRTH CERTIFICATE and HIDE HIS BACKGROUND IDENTITY so as to confuse those that question his citizenship and call them BIRTHERS. With the full support of the leftist MSM, SOCIALIST DEMOCRAT FRAUDS and regular democrat drones, shall be henceforth know as A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.


6 posted on 11/19/2012 2:22:58 PM PST by spawn44 (moo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KheSanh
Maybe if some of the Billionaires who pumped mega millions into Romney campaign, could have better spent revealing who Obama really is.

Oops forgot, he is a Nice man with a Nice smile, and we have nothing to fear from him. It is that Evil Rush Limbaugh that we must fear.

7 posted on 11/19/2012 2:24:56 PM PST by itsahoot (Any enemy, that is allowed to have a King's X line, is undefeatable. (USS Taluga AO-62))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns
In that full congressional hearing, BOTH John McCain’s birthplace was examined, as well as the citizenship of BOTH his parents.

Actually I think it was just a Sense of The Senate Resolution, not a full Congressional exercise.

8 posted on 11/19/2012 2:26:35 PM PST by itsahoot (Any enemy, that is allowed to have a King's X line, is undefeatable. (USS Taluga AO-62))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KheSanh
"A petition asking the Supreme Court to give a clear concise definition of the term "Natural Born Citizen".

My guess on SCOTUS decision:

"Whatever Obama wants it to be."

(majority opinion delivered by Chief Justice John Roberts)

9 posted on 11/19/2012 2:38:02 PM PST by Zman516
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KheSanh

Going by the U.S. Constitution there has only ever been three types of U.S. citizen.

Those who were citizens at the time of the adoption of the Constitution.

Those who are naturalized as U.S. citizens.

Those who are natural born citizens.


10 posted on 11/19/2012 2:41:37 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KheSanh
The Supreme Court does not give advisory opinions. Never has.

Anyone who signs this "petition" is simply attesting to his/her ignorance of that fact.

11 posted on 11/19/2012 2:42:16 PM PST by Notary Sojac (Ut veniant omnes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns

And mccain’s eligibility was brought up BECAUSE they knew obama was not eligible. And mccain knew it, too.


12 posted on 11/19/2012 2:48:10 PM PST by Terry Mross (I haven't watched the news since the election. Someone ping me if anything big happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Yup. Although never definitively stated as such, that’s the way past Supreme Court decisions point.

Since group A is long dead, there are presently only two categories of US citizens.


13 posted on 11/19/2012 2:56:52 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

>>> Actually I think it was just a Sense of The Senate Resolution, not a full Congressional exercise.

It was an act of congress... (they ACTED upon what they KNEW to be the proper definition) an act which makes interpretation of the term by the supreme court MOOT at this point. For the democrats to come out opposing the same test against Obama would be the biggest application of “double standard” I can think of. SCOTUS would HAVE to consider that hearing, regardless of it’s size... because the end result of that act was to potentially disqualify McCain from running.


14 posted on 11/19/2012 2:58:54 PM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns
It was an act of congress... (they ACTED upon what they KNEW to be the proper definition)

B$. Show me the Law they created defining Natural Born.

Sense of the Senate is used when they want to honor a flower or some other stupid thing. It has no force of Law.

15 posted on 11/19/2012 3:11:19 PM PST by itsahoot (Any enemy, that is allowed to have a King's X line, is undefeatable. (USS Taluga AO-62))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle

At least please read the petition and help us get the required 150 signatures so the public can see it. It expires on December 11. This petition will help inform the American public on an issue that has not been resolved, and it has been an issue since President Arthur in the late 1800’s. Forget asking the Republican controlled House to address it. They had their chance and for whatever reason did nothing. Yes, I have written my congress people.


16 posted on 11/19/2012 3:11:53 PM PST by KheSanh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KheSanh
King Obama and his communists empire are in control of this Country. The dysfunctional Republicans will never challenge the King.
17 posted on 11/19/2012 3:33:41 PM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

>>> B$. Show me the Law they created defining Natural Born.

It’s called the US Constitution which gives congress the responsibility and authority to ensure presidential candidates are eligible. The courts over the last 4 years have re-asserted this fact overwhelmingly.

Congress acted upon it’s authority. No new law was needed.

Now they just need to apply the law EQUALLY.


18 posted on 11/19/2012 3:37:08 PM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KheSanh

Waste of time. The SCOTUS answered this question in the late 19th century.


19 posted on 11/19/2012 3:49:04 PM PST by DustyMoment (Congress - another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KheSanh
If this part of the constitution was in the US code we may of had a chance in court against Obama. It wasn't thus technically it wasn't a law.

Just a suggestion for a petition

20 posted on 11/19/2012 3:50:46 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-326 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson