Skip to comments.Benghazi Attack Was Failed Kidnapping To Trade Blind Sheik
Posted on 12/04/2012 7:06:53 AM PST by ExxonPatrolUs
A hard to read, hard to believe, hard to write about communique from South Florida Tea Party sources involves the alleged real reasons General David Petreaus was forced out a few days before the Benghazi hearings. Citing the stand down orders, the stupid video, and the pulled security, this memo makes a convincing case that a failed October Surprise kidnap event of the U.S. diplomat had a political backdrop involving the impending election. Various background data mentioned in this bulletin contain a tit for tat exchange of Mission Chief Chris Stevens for the Blind Sheik, Omar Abdel Rahman who was involved in the 1993 U.S. World Trade Center attack.
Also alluded to trade is a possible $1.2 billion in U.S. aid earmarked for the Muslim Brotherhood, the group expected to have had a primary role in the Stevens-Sheik switch. Now, Americas stellar fighting mans takedown because of titillating sex, lies, and email trails just seems too convenient, too time driven, too slick by half. Election Day loomed, the Benghazi hearings can be delayed no longer, and tight poll numbers needed a deus ex machina. Was a contrived solution to this triangulated difficulty imposed by Democrat operatives hell bent on putting Obama back in the Oval Office? The best laid plans of mice and men often do go far astray, and the stand down order to a tiny group of highly trained ex-Navy Seals/CIA operatives backfired when they managed to employ the full measure of their skills, and took out over 80 attackers in the process, which enraged the attackers, who were led to believe that they would encounter no resistance. Was Ambassador Stevens defiled in horrible ways and dragged through Benghazi streets? Were two drones really flying over the consulate during this horrific fire zone in which our American soldiers and diplomats were left to die? This Tea Party bulletin goes on to say anonymously that our CIA operatives on the ground were painting targets because they knew air cover was available! And was an October Surprise in a political arena far away the real reason the flesh and blood of our dedicated warriors were spilled? And what about Hillary Clinton, who according to this memo, is now openly laying the blame at the feet of our Democrat administration. Stop and think about what really is going on right now. Congress heard closed door secrets about this Benghazi betrayal and murder. They have to know something they are not telling the American people.
When will the survivors tell their story?
Yes it was. The CIA/SEAL men that went in an foiled it are true heros.
The people that dreamed up this plot? Traitors.
We will never know most history.
None of the folks on FR are rich and powerful enough to be the writers.
This is the same scenario that I concluded from the eventual facts that we knew at the two week mark. Either he knew too much about the Libyan/Syrian gun running and was making noises of getting out of it, even worse if Obama lost, or it was supposed to be an overwhelming force attack on the compound to kidnap the Ambassador. The problem came when the idiot terrorists screwed the pooch by going off script in lighting the furniture on fire with diesel fuel trying to smoke them out of the “safe room”.
So, do we get any kind of link to the South Florida Tea Party memo to see their conclusions for ourselves?
Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.
Obama is a grifter.....a con man......a pickpocket. If you want to see how the Democrat leaders operate, just look up pickpocket team on the Internet. This Blind Sheik story is just a “Stall”. It’s designed to take your attention away from your money, and it is your money in the public treasury, while the thieves grab it.
Well there is nothing now, stopping this administration from sending to Egypt their blind religious terrorist. Unfortunately, the House is controlled by go along get along so called Republicans.
You don’t always have to be rich and powerful. Just one new idea can change the world
You’re too kind, my words for him are banned.
I suspect the thirty or so embassy staff members that were saved by the SEALs have already been threatened by the 0bama regime, at least with the loss of their jobs, but also with prosecution or worse if they talk.
It is strange that there has been no mention of these people testifying before congress. It makes me think that they really don't want to find out the truth. They would then be forced to take some type of action against the kenyan and Hildabeast.
likely the same people in the obozo administration, if not the obozo himself who spawn the Fast and Furious gun running scheme.
i really doubt this scenario...
does anybody really think that obama negotiating with terrorists would score big political points at home?
i think that if he repelled the attack and saved the ambassador, that he would have gained some cred and it would have helped him more.
it was an incompetent screwup by the admin and handled even worse
I believe you are correct, however I have noticed that articles(notably Canadian FreePress) covering this angle to Benghazi have been pulled by FP...why??
Yep. They made me sit in the corner here on FR for 24 hours because I used bad language. I think swearing just to be swearing is wrong. It is offensive to many people, and then they quit reading. So, you have to try a different way of riling people up. And I haven’t found out how to do that, yet. We’re a well-mannered group here at FR. We tell the robbers to wipe their feet when they break into our houses.
“i really doubt this scenario...”
The smoking gun here is the fact that the existing security was removed and not replaced. Knowing they weren’t going to be replaced, their commander, (I believe his name was Wood or Woods), requested permission to STAY and was denied.
WHY...??? would this be “allowed” to happen? The only explanation is that it was PLANNED. They had to get the security out of there.
you may be right that removing security was a red flag that this was planned, but to negotiate for the blind shiek? i doubt it. there must be some other reason.
keep up the great work ...
I remember stories posted here on FR saying “possible release (or words to that effect) of the blind sheik” to Egypt.
When exactly were they published?
I seem to remember it being before Benghazi.
keep up the GREAT work ... something will happen down the road ... your postings will give us all the “record” that people will be able to connect the dots ...
i remember those stories too, and the negative reaction to the trial balloons. giving him up due to hostage taking would have has a far worse reaction.
it has to be some other reason. i can understand the secret jail thoery, or the weapons cache thoery a lot better.3
Hagmann ain’t allowed here. Not sure why. The New York Times is, and it’s slime written by leftist faggots.
I suspect the real reason behind the cover up was that the annex was a CIA “black hole” prison. The attackers were trying to get the prisoners out. Broadwell stated that in her speech in Denver. How did she know? Well that is obvious isn’t it? It would have been Obama’s Abu Graib..enough reason to not cause a potential international incident with a rescue attempt. The CIA sure did get in there and scrub the scene pretty fast didn’t they?
makes more sense than the blind shiek story