Posted on 12/10/2012 10:33:55 PM PST by Daffynition
A record loss of Arctic sea ice and faster-than-expected melting of Greenlands ice cap made worldwide headlines in 2012, but research published in major science journals in the fall suggest warming in the North doesnt have to continue.
We could refreeze the Arctic, proposed a paper in Nature Climate Change. It wouldnt even cost that much, said an affiliated study in Environmental Research Letters.
The question is should we?
In terms of pure technical capacity, any significant nation in the world could do it, said David Keith, a Calgarian and professor of applied physics at Harvard University, one of the lead authors in both studies.
The really hard questions here arent mostly technical. Theyre questions about what kind of planet we want and who we are.
“Scientists have long theorized that injecting reflective particles of some kind into the high atmosphere could reduce the amount of sunlight reaching the Earths surface and compensate for the greenhouse effect. High CO2 levels would continue to trap heat, but with less energy coming in to begin with, temperatures on the surface would go down.
Keiths paper used climate models to cautiously suggest that the method could be adapted to engineer regional effects. The right amount of aerosols in the right place at the right time could restore the Arctics frozen glory.”
QUACKERY!!!
Scientists have long “THEORIZED” that injecting reflective particles “OF SOME KIND”......
I think they have been injecting themselves with a substance of some kind.
The shift is not a flip as one would do with a pancake.
The dipolar field loses its strength and small polarity fields develop all over the earth. These small polarity fields slowly reorganize to a strong dipolar field with a reverse polarity. The sun does this every cycle and it is what creates all the sunspots and CME’s during solar max.
“With dreams like that one you should give up sleeping.”
This is why I do not watch TV, especially news prior to going to bed.
True, many mornings I wake up and feel as though I did not sleep. Thank God for naps!
“In terms of pure technical capacity, any significant nation in the world could do it,
NO THEY CAN’T. These people don’t realize how HUGE the earth is. It’s a matter of scale. The earth is TOO BIG for us to have any “significant” global impact on climate or anything else.
A grain of sand on the beach or more appropriate, in the desert.
A drop of water (or 4 to 5 million barrels of BP crude) in the ocean.
We, PUNY humans can’t affect the entire planet. It is beyond arrogant to think that we can. (Never mind that we shouldn’t even try).
Lefties believe in evolution, but they also believe that evolution should stop now that they are here and if anything changes, it’s bad.
These people are effing nuts!
Saving this one very good
Two quick lessons for climate change zealots:
1) Climate changes - it will different tomorrow compared to today, next week compared to this week, next month compared to this month, next year compared to this year, next decade compared to this decade, and next century compared to this century. Yes, climate changes, and it did before AlGore was even a twinkle in his father’s eye.
2) All of the earth was once covered in water - that’s REAL sea level rise.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.