Skip to comments.Question about Obama eligibility
Posted on 12/13/2012 12:20:29 PM PST by chuckles
click here to read article
No, because his election was certified by both Houses of Congress.
He could be impeached, but then his defense, right or wrong, would be his election was certified by Congress.
Best of luck to you pal! Stand by for a vicious flaming from some of our friends who claim to love the truth, but have apparently decided this is not a winning issue, etc, etc, etc.
If you even dare to ask about Obama’s academic records, you’re considered a “worldnutdaily” nut.
I have great respect for Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s and others efforts efforts.
(Nothing to see here. Move along) </sarc >
Obviously if you don’t think hussein is eligible you are a racist. /s
[some people have] apparently decided this is not a winning issue
Not yet, but I think we have a real shot at keeping Obama from winning the 2016 election.
Don't hold your breath. I fully expect an Obama third term.
I don’t have to tell people that I have no love for 0bama, I actually warned people about taking his election lightly because once elected, he would be difficult to get rid of him.
The problems with the “eligibility issue” is that
1. Jerome Corsi has screwed it up so badly that no one actually believes he has any credibility anymore. One minute Obama is born in Kenya, the next his father is not even Obama Sr. Which is it Jerome?
2. Inconsistancy - One minutes it was Obama’s birth certificate then Emmerich de Vattel. Most of the birthers who bring up Emmerich de Vattel had never heard of him three years ago and now they are experts on the subject.
I welcome all opinions or debates on the subject, but there are people who never have stepped into a classroom let alone a law school claim to be experts on “Hampersnett” and know more than a Mark Levin on the subject.
Certification by means of fraudulent representations constitutes a High Crime punishable the same as any form of perjury, subversion, impersonation, and more. Furthermore, a number of U.S. Senators, Representatives, and justices may be impeached and convicted for their own roles in the fraud.
Please tell me you accidentally left off the < /sarc > in your post.
Obama in 2016? The way things are going, maybe?? LOL
In order to prove any thing “fraudulent”, one must prove that someone intended to mislead.
This type of Idea was brought up in a mailing list I was on in 2008 when rumors first circulated that Obama was ineligible. The answer back then was to stop challenging Obama, and challenge each State's Secretary of State on the eligibility of the candidate. This should have been done as a full court press for each State at the time. The second idea was to enact laws in States -- if not Congress to provide a more definitive set of procedures to ensure eligibility, including documentation verification, before the 2012 election came around. I know of no examples of organizations other than Orly Taitz to have tried to tackle the first part, and no person or organization to attempt the latter part. Nobody is going to go to jail over this. The problem is Obama was not illegally elected. He was legally elected because all the correct and right people deemed his documentation sufficient, then on top of that the election was certified and Obama was subsequently sworn in by the CJSCOTUS.
hardly anyone has any balls anymore. ‘specially the MSM.
even conservative commentators don’t have any.
Joe does, but few listen.
I have a birth certificate, and I can show it to you right now, no excuse whatsoever. If it was forged, then it must have been done in Oregon for some unknown reason that I know nothing about.
When it gets down to brass tacks, stupid is not qualified because he has not a “natural born citizen”. His supposed father was not a citizen of the United States. That negates even a problem whether he was born in the US or not.
He is disqualified on that point alone.
All the senate and house should be impeached along with the idiot and vice idiot for failing to defend the Constitution.
they gave an oath to do so.
In fact, the idiot should be charged for treason for pledging to support the Constitution and then undermining it.
If you need a lawyer or a judge to tell you what the Constitution says, you are too stupid to vote.
As far as I know.. IF we can prove it (pretty much already been done), and if we can get the proper representatives to act on it (so far, they have been real pussies), they can be charged for treason (each and every one of them)... and be shot at gunpoint.
Please tell me you accidentally left off the </sarc> in your post.I assumed it would be obvious. Silly me, this is the Internet... ;-)
Re: I welcome all opinions or debates on the subject, but there are people who never have stepped into a classroom let alone a law school claim to be experts on Hampersnett and know more than a Mark Levin on the subject.
Well FRiend, maybe you could enlighten me on Harrison J. Bounel. See grapic:
Sorry it’s from a Corsi article. I found it from a quick FR keyword search of “SSN.”
Corsi is hardly alone on the issue.
Look forward to hearing from you on the matter. (I will be out of the office until tomorrow.)
P.S. I have the greatest respect for Levin, but he told us George Allen was the only chance Republicans had of beating Tim Kaine for U.S. Senate last month. Allen was the least conservative of the 4 primary candidates. Kaine won anyway.
He was illegally elected. The only way he got on the ballots was through an Official Certification of Nomination that Bob Bauer (DNC Counsel) knew was both fraudulent and perjurious, since Attorney Larry Klayman informed him that HI state registrar Alvin Onaka had confirmed to AZ SOS Ken Bennett that the HI birth certificate is legally non-valid and there are thus no legally-determined birth facts for Obama based on that BC.
IOW, we know there was election fraud in every state of the union - to the extent that every electoral vote Obama got was a result of electoral fraud.
And we also know that with no legally-valid US birth certificate there is no way he could have qualified by Jan 20, 2008 or 2012 as required by the 20th Amendment - unless there is first an administrative and/or judicial proceeding to determine the probative value of the non-valid HI BC.
In addition to that, we know that anybody who claimed he was eligible either took that on faith without any proof from Hawaii whatsoever, they were deceived by a forgery created by Obama’s people, or else they outright lied. Both the short-form and long-form BC’s are known as forgeries, since Hawaii could not have certified a copy of a non-valid BC (either short or long) without having the legally-required marks of non-validity on the BC. Onaka has confirmed (through 2 different verifications) that the WH forgery is NOT a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file” and that the information contained in the WH forgery is NOT “identical to” the information contained in the genuine record.
This is something I have been working on. We shall overcome someday. That still doesn't change his SS# from a dead person from Conn. /s
Either Dreams or the WH BC PDF is a lie.
For these reasons http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2967425/posts?page=39#39 I believe the WH BC PDF to be a lie.
The WH BC PDF was produced with the intent to mislead. It is for public consumption only, not official. It's only purpose is to deceive the public.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.