Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity - Has any one seen "The Hobbit"

Posted on 12/15/2012 2:39:40 PM PST by Perdogg

I was going to avoid it because I saw too many mental Hobbits (no offense to Hobbits) on election day. I was wondering if it was any good.

Next week I will see "Jack Reacher" and post a review.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Music/Entertainment; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: hobbit; hollywood; moviereview; movies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-81 next last

1 posted on 12/15/2012 2:39:46 PM PST by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kronos77; mass55th; Perdogg; DollyCali; EveningStar; Borges; Mr. K; Blondie; altura; mylife; ...

ping


2 posted on 12/15/2012 2:41:27 PM PST by Perdogg (Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA4) for President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Didn’t see either one but Reacher got panned for casting Cruise to play a 6’4” Marine. ..and rightfully so.


3 posted on 12/15/2012 2:44:13 PM PST by Mountain Mary (Pray for our Republic...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
I saw the 50 second movie trailer but I could only watch 25 seconds because it looked sucky.
4 posted on 12/15/2012 2:45:22 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I have not seen it, but I definitely will in the next week. Favorite author and Peter Jackson did an incredible job with the previous films for LOTR.


5 posted on 12/15/2012 2:46:20 PM PST by volunbeer (We must embrace austerity or austerity will embrace us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Saw it today in IMAX 3D High Frame Rate. It was good, though not as good as the LOTR trilogy. The high frame rate just ended up being distracting, frankly, but the 3D was done very nicely.

Bonus: it started with a 10-min (I think) preview of the new Star Trek movie.


6 posted on 12/15/2012 2:49:57 PM PST by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I’ll probably wait until I can buy the BlueRay DVD as it will be cheaper than going to the movie.


7 posted on 12/15/2012 2:50:46 PM PST by tje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer

The LOTR books are better, with deeper and more meaningful truths, than the Hobbit.


8 posted on 12/15/2012 2:52:28 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

It’s been very well rated at imdb.


9 posted on 12/15/2012 2:55:57 PM PST by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Not Hobbits, zombies. :)

I've read all of the "Jack Reacher" books. Lee Child and Nelson DeMille are two of my favourite authors. I have no problem with Cruise playing Reacher, despite his height.

I haven't seen either movie, though.

10 posted on 12/15/2012 2:58:42 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I actually have “The Hobbit” on disc. It is the old CED format and it is animated.

It is pretty good actually and I normally would never watch a cartoon version of anything.

Many years ago my Daughter picked it out or I never would have seen it.


11 posted on 12/15/2012 3:00:36 PM PST by yarddog (One shot one miss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Some people said they were going only to check out the nine-minute opening to 'Star Trek: Into Darkness' and 'Man of Steel' at IMAX theaters.

That would work out to roughly a buck per minute...yeah, that's happening.

12 posted on 12/15/2012 3:01:14 PM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

*SQUEALING WITH DELIGHT* A Jack Reacher movie? Do tell!


13 posted on 12/15/2012 3:01:25 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I saw it last night. Plenty of action with amazing luck for the Dwarf side! I read the Hobbit twice back in my youth and there is a lot of stuff here that was not in those books but which was somewhere in Lord of The Rings, (If only the appendix). I did not realize it was going to be a three part movie, so they had to draw from more than just the Hobbit to fill three movies! Overall I think the movie is better than the book itself because it tells a larger story than that of the dwarfs and the dragon. I was entertained and forgot Obama was destroying America if only for a few hours.


14 posted on 12/15/2012 3:01:34 PM PST by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trisham

Am taking my kids to see it Christmas Eve. The Hobbit is a children’s story, so it’s going to be different than the LOTR.


15 posted on 12/15/2012 3:01:45 PM PST by Mmogamer (I refudiate the lamestream media, leftists and their prevaricutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Just saw it this afternoon, cannot recommend it. Same ole, same ole, as someone said, without the depth of LOTR.

Same ole monsters (Orcs, etc.), bad guys - Bilbo and Frodo haven’t aged a day surprisingly.

Frame rate too fast, typical 2 second shots, lots of action at times, dialog kept simple. Stunning scenery tho.

Not planing to see the others coming.....leaves you hanging at end to make you go to the next one. But hey, I’m 67, so younger ones will think differently. 4 of my kids 27 to 34 asked me to join them, and was glad to do so.

Bad thing is to get a decent seat, you have to sit through trailers for at least 15 garbage movies before the movie starts. But, that’s just the way it is today.......


16 posted on 12/15/2012 3:01:57 PM PST by Arlis (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

We saw it today. Visually and artistically it was amazing. But I expected it to follow the book word for word. I’d have been better off going in with no expectations.

However, a really meaningful theme is working through a desire for vengeance and revenge, trying to rise above that.


17 posted on 12/15/2012 3:04:21 PM PST by Cloverfarm (This too shall pass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
I saw it yesterday.

I thought the movie was incredible!

Now if your expecting it to be the next Return of the King(The Greatest Movie of all time) it is not.

But it's not suppose to be.

I saw it in 3D. I must admit that was a mixed blessing.

I had a pretty bad head ache and at the beginning when its all sunny, it felt like I was watching it through a pair of shades.

But the 3D greatly improved when we went to Goblin Town and the Flight to Erebor was incredible!

So the Critics at the L.A. can go jump in The Long Lake!

18 posted on 12/15/2012 3:05:38 PM PST by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman
Seems to be getting mixed reviews. Erik Kain over at Forbes gives a positive review and an explanation for Jackson’s forays into Tolkein’s appendices.
19 posted on 12/15/2012 3:08:12 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Saw it last night. It was good. It was a bit slow in some places but it stuck pretty close to the book. There was one thing I was not sure about. I am going to have to dig my copy of the book out and find out if it is in there and I just forgot about it.

The music was top notch. I will be buying the sound track.

20 posted on 12/15/2012 3:08:25 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Fate plays chess and you don't find out until too late that he's been using two queens all along)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

I will go to a theatre to watch it...and will ultimately add it to my LOTR video collection.

Like you said, good escapist stuff from some of the uglier aspects of reality. I am disappointed to hear that it will be released in three parts, though.

I guess we can expect The Silmarillion eventually..


21 posted on 12/15/2012 3:09:10 PM PST by SueRae (It isn't over. In God We Trust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mmogamer

That sounds like a lovely way to spend Christmas Eve with your children. We have all of the LOTR on DVD, and watch it often.


22 posted on 12/15/2012 3:09:20 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2915268/posts
23 posted on 12/15/2012 3:12:11 PM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
I'm not sure I can watch a 5'4" actor pretend he's a character who's supposed to be 6'4".

The Reacher books are great, Tom Cruise.....meh......

24 posted on 12/15/2012 3:16:30 PM PST by Lakeshark (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

Good grief, can you imagine how many movies it would take to do the Silmarillion?


25 posted on 12/15/2012 3:19:51 PM PST by Mmogamer (I refudiate the lamestream media, leftists and their prevaricutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Take a look at the link at post 23. :)


26 posted on 12/15/2012 3:20:33 PM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I’ll wait for a pirated copy, if I watch it at all. I’m a bit picky about keeping my dollars from crossing enemy lines.


27 posted on 12/15/2012 3:41:37 PM PST by fattigermaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mountain Mary
Didn’t see either one but Reacher got panned for casting Cruise to play a 6’4” Marine. .

Agree, except that the literary Jack Reacher may rip your liver out with his little fingeer for calling him a Marine. His father was a Marine; Jack Reacher was a soldier. West Point. U.S. Army.

28 posted on 12/15/2012 3:45:05 PM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Just came from seeing it with hubby. We both thought it STUNK. Could not wait for it to be over. We do like the original trilogy, although I am not too fond of part 2, call it the bad teeth movie, too many. We were pretty disappointed because we heard good things about it.


29 posted on 12/15/2012 3:52:11 PM PST by MomwithHope (Buy and read Ameritopia by Mark Levin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

I wouldn’t go see the Hobbit, just so I can watch a trailer, but it’s certainly a bonus.


30 posted on 12/15/2012 3:54:02 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

That Reacher flick looks pretty violent.

You sure you wanna risk walking out of the theater and going on a shooting spree?

/s


31 posted on 12/15/2012 3:55:48 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

I’m sure it could be done, because I don’t think the Silmarillion would be successful, at the box office.

It’s too high-minded and unrelateable. However, if they did make it, I’d go see it.


32 posted on 12/15/2012 4:00:58 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg; Anoreth; Monkey Face; Darksheare

I saw it this afternoon with four of my children (12, 10, 8, 6) and a gaggle of other children from the homeschool association, plus parents. It had lots of walking, hiking, trekking, and fleeing in it, as well as scenic views of prominent tourism-ad scenes of New Zealand. And some snappy dialogue, vigorous fight scenes, lot of falling, and a truly cool giant white Warg. And a surprising star turn for rabbits.

We were all on our best behavior. Only my 8-year-old, who isn’t the sharpest knife in the chandelier, said, “That wasn’t in the book!” a little too loudly.

All things considered, I had a good time. It’s quite a long movie. The boys ate some pretzels, and I had an apple and a spinach and onion sandwich.


33 posted on 12/15/2012 4:01:56 PM PST by Tax-chick (I'm a nightmare, not a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Hubby and I liked it. It was very intense at times and the three hours flew by. The 3D was neat and I wasn’t distracted by the HFR. Didn’t really notice it. The special effects were stunning and the music is good - themes from the LOTR.

I’m a huge fan of Martin Freeman who also plays Dr. Watson in the new Sherlock. He is beyond cute and has great facial expressions.

I really liked Thorin too.

I’d give in 4 stars as compared to 5 stars for LOTR. Escapism at its best and very welcome after a very bad news day yesterday,

Wouldn’t recommend it for Christmas Eve viewing (too intense in a bad way) or for children under 10-11 years of age. Way too violent and scary.


34 posted on 12/15/2012 4:09:49 PM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scoutmaster

We saw the Hobbit this AM in 24 FPS, NO 3D on purpose. It was good (3 1/2 stars), but not really great compared to LOTR(5 stars). Boy I don’t know if Jackson can stretch two more movies out of Tolkein’s 1937 childrens story???


35 posted on 12/15/2012 4:09:56 PM PST by mason-dixon (As Mason said to Dixon, you have to draw the line somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mason-dixon

Peter Jackson is drawing upon other Tolkien works. We’re getting more than just the Hobbit.


36 posted on 12/15/2012 4:14:42 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

I’d read any movie review you wrote.


37 posted on 12/15/2012 4:16:02 PM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Going monday. I’m expecting it to drag (there is simply not 3 movies in that book), but I’m nerdy enough to like it anyway.


38 posted on 12/15/2012 4:21:39 PM PST by discostu (Not a part of anyone's well oiled machine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scoutmaster; Monkey Face

Thank you. I figured the premise of the thread was, “Tell me something that will help me decide if I want to see the movie, without telling me everything so that I decide it would be a waste of time to see it.”

I thought the amount of time devoted to falling was excessive, but that’s just a personal taste. New Zealand is quite hilly, after all, so falling is appropriate to the landscape. Also, I’m sure I got drunk with some of the dwarves in my wasted youth in Texas. They have long lifespans.


39 posted on 12/15/2012 4:21:51 PM PST by Tax-chick (I'm a nightmare, not a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Arlis

“Bilbo and Frodo haven’t aged a day surprisingly.”

It’s a prequel. Why would they have aged?


40 posted on 12/15/2012 4:25:11 PM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

gandolf said that hobbits make good thieves. Therefore I’m not going to see a movie about hobbitual criminals.

;-)

especially on opening weekends with masses of crowds.


41 posted on 12/15/2012 4:28:17 PM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mountain Mary

I think Adam Baldwin would have made a great Jack Reacher.


42 posted on 12/15/2012 4:28:28 PM PST by FreedomForce (Living in the Age of American Soft Despotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

We thought there would be crowds this afternoon, and had bought our tickets in advance and arrived early, but the showing we saw was lightly attended, at most 1/3 full. Everyone got the seats they wanted!

This was at a low-tech-visuals screening, due to our taking fairly young children (6-year-olds), and my problem with throwing up. I didn’t ask our organizer what she thought about the kicked-up 3D version when she saw it with her teenagers last night. We’ll discuss it at Tolkien’s Birthday Party on January 3, when we meet for Thematic Snacks and the last hurrah of the Hobbit Club.


43 posted on 12/15/2012 4:32:20 PM PST by Tax-chick (I'm a nightmare, not a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Scoutmaster

I don’t think I’ve seen a Tom Cruise movie all the way or most of the way through since “Top Gun.”


44 posted on 12/15/2012 4:33:01 PM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I heard Reacher is getting delayed due to the CT shooting.


45 posted on 12/15/2012 4:54:20 PM PST by Mac n Jac (www.vetsfightingms.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu; Tax-chick

The three movies are NOT “in that book.” Most of what the movies consist of are from the Appendices in “The Return of the King.” It gives the origins and histories of the races of Middle Earth, and therefore, are essential to “The Hobbit.”

Please, cast aside your preconceived ideas about “The Hobbit,” and look at it as a movie (or Movies) to be experienced, as LOTR was.

Just sayin’. ;o]


46 posted on 12/15/2012 4:54:48 PM PST by Monkey Face (Help stamp out and abolish superfluous redundancy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: discostu; Monkey Face

I did not find that it dragged. I enjoyed the way the characters were done, even if they were different from how I would have written them.

As for the book on its own, I think it would have been hard to do a great job in one movie, and three would be too much. Maybe two, allowing for more of the author’s dialogue.


47 posted on 12/15/2012 5:03:11 PM PST by Tax-chick (I'm a nightmare, not a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I was going to go see it today . . . but $7.50 for a matinee ticket? huh?

I remember getting to see two movies, get a box of popcorn and a soft drink and get about 35 cents change back on my dollar.


48 posted on 12/15/2012 5:28:52 PM PST by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pilgrim's Progress

I remember when movie cost 15 Cents for kids.

Even when money was tight, our parents would let me and my two Brothers go to the Bay Theater in Panama City on Saturdays.

There would usually be a Gene Autry or Roy Rogers or Tarzan movie on. There would also be a cartoon amd a serial.


49 posted on 12/15/2012 5:47:32 PM PST by yarddog (One shot one miss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I saw it in 3D with the family. I only go to the theater once a year (hate bankrolling the American hating hollywood ingrates). I did enjoy the movie. Didn’t much care for radagast brown with bird poop down the side of his face nor his wicker sled pulled by rabbits at Mach 2. The fight/flee scene in the mountain had me thinking I was watching an extended “Raiders of the Lost Ark” roller coaster scene. If I had it to do over, I would watch again. 7/10


50 posted on 12/15/2012 5:56:35 PM PST by heavyjunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-81 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson