Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti 'gun confiscation' laws.
12/22/12 | grumpygresh

Posted on 12/22/2012 7:47:13 AM PST by grumpygresh

Statements by Obama and NY governor Cuomo and others have made gun owners very worried. If we get an assault weapons ban via congressional action or presidential order, who will stop the momentum from turning to outright confiscation especially in Leftist jurisdictions. I don't know if any states currently have state laws that address this specific issue, but we need to make sure that our gun and property rights are secure from the gun grabbers at all levels.


TOPICS: Society; Sports
KEYWORDS: banglist; confiscation; guncontrol; guns; secondamendment; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: tacticalogic

“Assault weapons... are a new topic. The weapons’ menacing looks, coupled with the public’s confusion over fully-automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons — anything that looks like a machine gun is assumed to be a machine gun — can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on these weapons.”

-Josh Sugarmann, “Assault Weapons: Analysis, New Research and Legislation”, March 1989


21 posted on 12/22/2012 8:34:16 AM PST by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Helotes
I wrote about this yesterday....re; the Brits disarming the Patriots.

Go back and read the Declaration of Independence.....THEN read the Bill of Rights.

22 posted on 12/22/2012 8:35:47 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

Confiscation laws just another step to dismatling the constitution,one day at a time,any excuse is exceptable.


23 posted on 12/22/2012 8:35:57 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

Such a law is unnecessary and dangerous. The 2A does it all and is a permanent restraint. A law would weaken the import of the 2A and laws can be rescinded at the next Congress.


24 posted on 12/22/2012 8:45:59 AM PST by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax
Your statement was exactly what I have been trying to put to words...

"Gun grabbers must wait for more brutal killings, all of which are the result of “gun free zone” legislation, deliberately crafted to facilitate mass murder."

If you've no objections I would like to repeat in the future....

25 posted on 12/22/2012 8:48:15 AM PST by SERE_DOC ( “The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.” TJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
"People who talk about hiding their weapons have already lost."

Correct.

Quite a few of those here on Freerepublic.

26 posted on 12/22/2012 8:51:29 AM PST by Godebert (No Person Except a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Interesting point; however, if there are huge numbers of owners who do not turn them in, then is the government prepared to put millions upon millions of Americans in prison ontop of the existing prison population? Perhaps they do, although, we’ll be full tilt Stalinist Russia when it happens. My guess is those who have land and resources will bury them somewhere in the woods of the fruited plains all across America. I don’t think the governments resources are great enough to unearth all the units.


27 posted on 12/22/2012 8:57:21 AM PST by MachIV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: apillar

you really believe the federal background checks are erased after the prescribed time?


28 posted on 12/22/2012 9:51:47 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

the whole confiscation issue is a dead one.

You see, aren’t gun owners frequently outdoorsmen? Do we not fish, often out alone and for extended periods of time. While, just last week I was in my canoe, fishing and cleaning my pistol collection - when out of no where, a wave capsized my canoe - sending all my pistols to the bottom of the river. Sadly, I paddled ashore, lucky to have saved both my fishing pole and my tackle box.

And that’s what happened to my handguns, sir; and as luck would have it, the same thing happened to my rifle and shotgun collection too. Now, unless you have evidence to the opposite - the gun collectors can just mosey along. The courts are required to prove guilt, I have no need to prove my innocence.


29 posted on 12/22/2012 9:52:29 AM PST by Hodar (A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame somebody else.- Burroughs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon

They are called AR 15 not 16 because they are “almost” assault rifles.


30 posted on 12/22/2012 9:56:54 AM PST by csmusaret (I will give Obama credit for one thing- he is living proof that familiarity breeds contempt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
You lose your job, your savings account, retirement accounts, your home and everything in it. Oh yeah, they'll take your kids too.

I just placed all my assets in a trust. I no longer own anything and we have no kids. I'm retired so they can't take my job. If they want to lock me up they'll have to feed me and handle any health problems. They only have traction if they go all "third world" on me which is not impossible but I'd doubt they would get too rough with a near septuagenarian.

Regards,
GtG

31 posted on 12/22/2012 10:30:00 AM PST by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
"the whole confiscation issue is a dead one.

Tell that to the people who owned Street Sweeper shotguns. The Feds reclassified them as Destructive Devices that required NFA registration. Those that could not get LEO signoff had to surrender them or face a ten year prison term for possesing an unregistered DD. Also once the amnesty registration period was over the ATF began traceing the unaccounted ones from the manufacturer's records to the first purchaser by using the records that are already required and in place for the next gun grab.

32 posted on 12/22/2012 10:30:36 AM PST by bruoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret
There is no such thing as almost. A rifle is or is not an assault rifle. If it is only semi-auto then it by definition is not an assault rifle. Being a semi-automatic only does not make it an “almost” assault rifle. If that were true then all semiautomatics can be defined as “almost” assault rifles. Definitions are very important. The press likes to call AR-15s “semi-automatic assault rifles” which is a contradiction in terms.

We cannot allow the left to define the terms by which the debate will be held...

33 posted on 12/22/2012 10:32:01 AM PST by ColdSteelTalon (Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon

“Just a friendly reminder. AR-15’s are not assault rifles. They are semi-auto rifles that look like military rifles.”

Agree. “Assault rifles” is a Leftist term used to demonize guns and gun owners. We should refrain from using the term because it has no exact definition, and that’s what the Leftists always do. So when a Lefty says they want an assault rifle or assault weapons ban, make them define it. If they say all semi-auto weapons, that would include all semi-auto rifles, pistols and double action revolvers which has to be more than 80% of guns on the market.


34 posted on 12/22/2012 10:45:16 AM PST by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est; zero sera dans l'enfer bientot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon
You correct. The semi-auto AR-15 is not an assault rifle, but it was and is an “assault weapon” as defined by the expired Federal AWB and several states’ current laws. A lot of people think the AR is short for Assault Rifle when in fact the AR stands for Armalite, the original manufacturer.
35 posted on 12/22/2012 10:50:41 AM PST by bruoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

I doubt that anti-gun confiscation laws have any real effect, because in the last about 20 years, major metropolitan police organizations have been told to “Go ahead and violate civil right *now*, because the litigation will take at least a year, and there will only be a small penalty paid with taxpayer money.”

Most of these violation occurred during international conferences held in these cities, with protestors, violent and non-violent outside. Importantly, many of the violations happened against people who were obviously not part of any demonstration or riot, but who were either caught unaware or were just onlookers. A man with a white shirt and tie, carrying a briefcase on a bicycle, is not your typical profile of a violent anarchist.

A good key indicator is when police put tape over their names and badge numbers.

In other situations, individuals from out of state would be brought in to violate civil rights, some of whom may not have even been LEOs, and were dressed in pseudo military uniforms while acting as paramilitaries.

To make matters worse, police in a martial law disaster area often believe that *they* are the law, and that civil rights have been suspended. They are *not* going to debate, only order and expect obedience.


36 posted on 12/22/2012 10:52:29 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Pennies and Nickels will NO LONGER be Minted as of 1/1/13 - Tim Geithner, US Treasury Sect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon

I bet you don’t have a funny bone in your arm either.


37 posted on 12/22/2012 11:06:07 AM PST by csmusaret (I will give Obama credit for one thing- he is living proof that familiarity breeds contempt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

As far as I am concerned, they are called modern muskets.


38 posted on 12/22/2012 11:13:18 AM PST by US_MilitaryRules (Unnngh! To many PDS people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bruoz
The old Fed AWB (modeled on the California ban which preceded it)defines an assault weapon as a semi-auto firearm that uses a detachable magazine and has more than one of the listed features: Pistol grip, flash hider, collapsing, folding or detachable stock, bayonet lug, or a barrel shroud.

You can bet the next Fed AWB ban will not allow any of the listed features (particularly the evil pistol grip) on any long gun.

39 posted on 12/22/2012 11:18:43 AM PST by bruoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: apillar

Not really, IF you bought it from an FFL dealer then THEY KNOW who you are, what you bought, and when you bought it. The gubmint has already admitted to mining all electronic data, you really think they don`t mine background checks?


40 posted on 12/22/2012 3:53:04 PM PST by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson