Skip to comments.Birther Lawyer Complains Federal Judge Is 'Stonewalling' Crazy Birther Suits [Evidence Tampering]
Posted on 12/22/2012 4:49:06 PM PST by SvenMagnussen
Montgomery Blair Sibley, the disbarred lawyer who once represented the so-called "D.C. Madam" and today spends his time attempting to disprove President Obama's birth certificate, is upset that a federal judge is not acknowledging his hobby.
In a news release, Sibley says that Judge John D. Bates of U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia "continues to ignore court rules" by not ruling on his motions to hold Obama, Harvard Law School, the Social Security Administration, the Selective Service System and the State Department in contempt.
He also claims that he now has "photographic evidence" that someone tampered with the State of Hawaii's birth records issued between July 28 and August 12, 1961. (Obama was born August 5 at Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital in Honolulu, btw.) Sibley issued the claim in another court filing yesterday in which he requested Bates order the immediate release of Privacy Act-protected records:
(Excerpt) Read more at dcist.com ...
They’re all chicken to look any closer.
Sibley Presents Evidence to Court of Criminal Tampering of Records Related to Obama’s Birth and Judge Bates Refuses to Rule on Motions to Hold Obama in Contempt
WASHINGTON D.C. - The multifaceted litigation that Montgomery Blair Sibley has initiated in an attempt to get to the truth regarding the birth records of Barack Hussein Obama II has both produced fruit and met judicial stonewalling.
Yesterday, Sibley filed an Emergency Second Motion for Order to Release Privacy Act-Protected Records. That motion presented photographic evidence to Judge Bates that someone
has tampered with the evidence related to Obamas putative birth in Hawaii on August 4, 1961. Sibley had subpoena from the National Archives the Arrival Records for August 1 through August 10, 1961, of all passengers arriving in Honolulu, Hawaii to see if records existed that Obama and his mother arrived in Hawaii during that time frame. What NARA produced were two microfilm spools of the arrival records for July 28 through August 1, 1961 and August 8 through August 12, 1961.
As detailed in the Emergency Motion, the original date on the box of August 7 has been altered by white-out and a new date of August 1 had been written on the box. Proof of that alteration comes from a photograph of the same box taken nine months earlier which reveals the date was originally August 7. Thus, indisputably the box has been tampered with a criminal offense to hide the fact that the microfilm for the August 2 through August 7, 1961 arrivals is now missing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY,
YVETTE ALEXANDER, DON R. DINAN AND
PLAINTIFFS EMERGENCY SECOND
MOTION FOR ORDER TO RELEASE
PRIVACY ACT-PROTECTED RECORDS AND
EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION BASED UPON
PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF DESTRUCTION
OF EVIDENCE RELATED TO OBAMAS
Pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum, NARA made available to Sibley the Arrival Records
for August 1 through August 10, 1961, of all passengers arriving in Honolulu, Hawaii. Sibley sought
these records given the date of Obamas birth on his publicly-released Certificate of Live Birth of
August 4, 1961 in Hawaii to see if he and/or his Mother arrived during that time-frame. If they did,
it would prove that Mr. Obama was not born in the United States and as such is not a U.S. Citizen.
The significance of this arrival form evidenced can be seen from the arrival record of a
three year old in Honolulu on August 8, 1961, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
That arrival record indicates the citizenship of the child.
What NARA produced on December 13, 2012, were two microfilm spools of the arrival
records for July 28 through August 1, 1961 and August 8 through August 12, 1961. Attached hereto
as Exhibit B, is a photograph of the boxes those two microfilm spools are stored in which show
the dates the spools cover. Even more significant, the date of August 1 has been altered. It
appears that white-out was applied and a new date was written over the original date of August
7, 1961. Proof of that alteration comes from a photograph of the same box taken six months before
on or about March 22, 2012 which reveals the date was originally August 7, 1961. Thus,
indisputably the box has been tampered with a criminal offense.
Comparing Exhibit “B” with Exhibit “C” clearly shows tampering.
Evidence has been altered.
Isn’t it funny that within hours of any major news story the media publishes every tiny detail of the the lives of the people involved. From Tiger Woods to David Patreus’ girlfriend to the Conn. school killer, we know it all - friends, employers, mothers, SAT scores, whatever. But when it comes to Obama the media is all but silent. The only conclusion is that there is some really bad stuff there that would shock even the most suspicious among us and they damn well know it.
Eric Nordstrom in a Congressional hearing Oct 10, 2012 .”The Taliban is on the inside of the building”
Is it just me, or is the headline tinged with a hint of bias against birthers?
Travesty is that we have a lot of people in the so-called “conservative” media who are Obama Supporters and have the same hatred for “Birthers” as the Liberal Media does. Many were the same people who went after Bill Clinton for fooling around with Monica Lewinsky...I would say an Ineligible President is much more pressing Constitutional issue.
No amount of evidence presented against Obama shall lure either the highest elites or the lowest of the “low-information voters”. One can produce the evidence until he is blue in the face, and it will not be consideered under any circumstance.
More important such protection involves very powerful people to cower judges from allowing suits to move forward. Question birthers need to ask is who are these powerful people and what are their motivations? IMHO this matter should be pursued even after Obama leaves office. The truth will eventually come out.
I was told about BHO2’s CIA connections during the summer election campaign of 2008. It is old news.
What is more important is his grandparents careers with the U.S. government. THAT I will not discuss, as it is still classified.
The following is from 2010:
Verified CIA Front, Business International Corp, Paid for Obamas Columbia College Tuition
Now all we need is a dozen sacks of mail addressed to “The One.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.