They’re all chicken to look any closer.
Sibley Presents Evidence to Court of Criminal Tampering of Records Related to Obama’s Birth and Judge Bates Refuses to Rule on Motions to Hold Obama in Contempt
WASHINGTON D.C. - The multifaceted litigation that Montgomery Blair Sibley has initiated in an attempt to get to the truth regarding the birth records of Barack Hussein Obama II has both produced fruit and met judicial stonewalling.
Yesterday, Sibley filed an Emergency Second Motion for Order to Release Privacy Act-Protected Records. That motion presented photographic evidence to Judge Bates that someone
has tampered with the evidence related to Obamas putative birth in Hawaii on August 4, 1961. Sibley had subpoena from the National Archives the Arrival Records for August 1 through August 10, 1961, of all passengers arriving in Honolulu, Hawaii to see if records existed that Obama and his mother arrived in Hawaii during that time frame. What NARA produced were two microfilm spools of the arrival records for July 28 through August 1, 1961 and August 8 through August 12, 1961.
As detailed in the Emergency Motion, the original date on the box of August 7 has been altered by white-out and a new date of August 1 had been written on the box. Proof of that alteration comes from a photograph of the same box taken nine months earlier which reveals the date was originally August 7. Thus, indisputably the box has been tampered with a criminal offense to hide the fact that the microfilm for the August 2 through August 7, 1961 arrivals is now missing.
Isn’t it funny that within hours of any major news story the media publishes every tiny detail of the the lives of the people involved. From Tiger Woods to David Patreus’ girlfriend to the Conn. school killer, we know it all - friends, employers, mothers, SAT scores, whatever. But when it comes to Obama the media is all but silent. The only conclusion is that there is some really bad stuff there that would shock even the most suspicious among us and they damn well know it.
Is it just me, or is the headline tinged with a hint of bias against birthers?
Travesty is that we have a lot of people in the so-called “conservative” media who are Obama Supporters and have the same hatred for “Birthers” as the Liberal Media does. Many were the same people who went after Bill Clinton for fooling around with Monica Lewinsky...I would say an Ineligible President is much more pressing Constitutional issue.
No amount of evidence presented against Obama shall lure either the highest elites or the lowest of the “low-information voters”. One can produce the evidence until he is blue in the face, and it will not be consideered under any circumstance.
Now all we need is a dozen sacks of mail addressed to “The One.”