Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SvenMagnussen

http://www.montgomeryblairsibley.com/library/contempt2.pdf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY,
PLAINTIFF,
VS.
YVETTE ALEXANDER, DON R. DINAN AND
WILLIAM LIGHTFOOT,
DEFENDANTS.

CASE NO.:12-CV-1984

PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY SECOND
MOTION FOR ORDER TO RELEASE
PRIVACY ACT-PROTECTED RECORDS AND
EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION BASED UPON
PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF DESTRUCTION
OF EVIDENCE RELATED TO OBAMA’S
BIRTH

[snip]

Pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum, NARA made available to Sibley the “Arrival Records”
for August 1 through August 10, 1961, of all passengers arriving in Honolulu, Hawaii. Sibley sought
these records given the date of Obama’s birth on his publicly-released Certificate of Live Birth of
August 4, 1961 in Hawaii to see if he and/or his Mother arrived during that time-frame. If they did,
it would prove that Mr. Obama was not born in the United States and as such is not a U.S. Citizen.

The significance of this “arrival form” evidenced can be seen from the arrival record of a
three year old in Honolulu on August 8, 1961, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.
That arrival record indicates the citizenship of the child.

What NARA produced on December 13, 2012, were two microfilm spools of the arrival
records for July 28 through August 1, 1961 and August 8 through August 12, 1961. Attached hereto
as Exhibit “B”, is a photograph of the boxes those two microfilm spools are stored in which show
the dates the spools cover. Even more significant, the date of “August 1” has been altered. It
appears that “white-out” was applied and a new date was written over the original date of “August
7, 1961”. Proof of that alteration comes from a photograph of the same box taken six months before
on or about March 22, 2012 which reveals the date was originally “August 7, 1961”. Thus,
indisputably the box has been tampered with – a criminal offense.

[snip]


4 posted on 12/22/2012 5:17:24 PM PST by SvenMagnussen (TINKER, TAILOR, SOLDIER, SPY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: SvenMagnussen

Comparing Exhibit “B” with Exhibit “C” clearly shows tampering.

Evidence has been altered.


5 posted on 12/22/2012 5:25:14 PM PST by reagandemocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson