Chuck Woolery on Assault Weapons (nails every point!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=evEg1VNfX3o ^

[Red in Blue PA]

Chuck Woolery for President!

[Catsrus]

Our Supreme Court protect us? Are you delusional? Have you forgotten Obamacare and how the SC protected us? Yeah, I have a lot of confidence in them./s

[Hillarys Gate Cult]

Anyone know what happened to Pat Sajak’s commentaries? He used to write for Human Events but hasn't done any new commentaries there in years. I find some on Ricochet.com but not much new. His website has nothing on it but his name.

[Cyman]

Very impressive. Reminds me of how years ago I heard that there was an actor running for California governor. I couldn’t figure out what a guy that introduced mule team Borax to his television audience AND coming from LaLaLand was running for anything other than dog catcher. Thank the Lord he didn’t listen to my laughter..

[Still Thinking]

Yeah, but for an encore we get Ahhh-nold, Jesse Ventura, and Al Franken.

[PGalt]

Very good analysis, CottShop! Thanks. BTTT!

[CottShop]

[[Our Supreme Court protect us? Are you delusional? Have you forgotten Obamacare and how the SC protected us?]]

didn’t you read what I said (I knopw my typing is terrible and it was probsably a terrible read- but I clearly said that our supreme court has NOT lifted a finger to protect us, and has infact doen just hte opposite thanks to that traitor to this country john roberts who apparently loves beign paid to shirk his actual job description. I clearly laid out that our supreme court and john roerts in particular are NOT protecting us- I said the ultimate solution woudl be to have a supreme court settle thsi case fairly and without ANY bias- just liek they are supposed to do- but of course they will not-

[Sergio]

Home viewing bookmark.

[JimRed]

B. It shall be the duty of the legislature of this State to adopt and enact any and all measures as may be necessary to prevent the enforcement of any State or federal acts, laws, orders, rules, or regulations in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

A slight modification, needed in many states that infringe upon the Second Amendment with permit requirements, etc.

[El Gato]

He makes the claim that our founding fathers want us to be armed equal to the army? This is hte first I’ve heard of htis?

Check out Tench Coxe:

The power of the sword, say the minority..., is in the hands of Congress. My friends and countrymen, it is not so, for The powers of the sword are in the hands of the yeomanry of America from sixteen to sixty. The militia of these free commonwealths, entitled and accustomed to their arms, when compared with any possible army, must be tremendous and irresistible. Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress has no power to disarm the militia. Their swords and every terrible implement of the soldier are the birthright of Americans. The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments but where, I trust in God, it will always remain, in the hands of the people.
The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788.

Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American... [T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.
Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788.

Whereas civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms.

Also think about the implications of Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution:

The Congress shall have Power
...
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

Not much point in granting Letterrs of Marque, if no one can own an armed ship. A ship with cannon, that is a privateer. (Letter of Marque grants the power to capture or destroy the shipping of an enemy nation. The Rules are about how to split the booty.

The Revolution started when the British Regulars tried to take the colonial's arms, including 3 cannons. They never got the cannons, and one of them is today in the museum near Concord's Old North Bridge.

[CottShop]

Well that’s it, I’m gettign myself an armed ship- always wanted a hosueboat/battleship

Seriously htough- thanks for the info- I wasn’t aware of that-

[[and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;]]

Which obviously means ‘make rules abotu how to capture on land and water’ but unfortunately, the left will think that ‘make rules’ means limitting the right to own guns- or any other rules they can think of- That’s how they twist our constitution