To: Morgana
the suspected child molester in a headlock A fifteen year old girl is not a "child". The man should be charged, with statutory rape, not "child molesting".
10 posted on
12/29/2012 3:32:54 PM PST by
Michael.SF.
(Obama lied, Stevens died.)
To: Michael.SF.
bleeeech....you either have no children or no daughters. Get your head out of that dark nether space. A 15 yr old is indeed a child
13 posted on
12/29/2012 3:38:12 PM PST by
Nifster
To: Michael.SF.
A fifteen year old girl is not a “child”. The man should be charged, with statutory rape, not “child molesting”.
You don’t know jack squat about Texas law, bo.
18 posted on
12/29/2012 3:41:59 PM PST by
wolficatZ
(Hey blue states....Got Food?)
To: Michael.SF.
A fifteen year old girl is not a "child". The man should be charged, with statutory rape, not "child molesting". >>>>>>Prepare to get flamed for that one, I've been saying the same thing - A 10 or 11 year old is a child. A 15-17 year old may be legally under age but they are not a child. The POS may go to jail for having sex with someone underage, but he should not be called a "child molester". Same thing goes (even more) for the overuse of the word pedophile.
21 posted on
12/29/2012 3:52:30 PM PST by
conservaterian
(NOW can we have a conservative candidate?????)
To: Michael.SF.
Let me guess, you're just mad the parents didn't offer him a condom and then step out of the room again?
Troll, troll, troll your post
Gently down the thread
You're from San Francisco
What was that you said?
42 posted on
12/29/2012 4:51:29 PM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson