Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hannity Guest Literally Covers His Ears In Protest During Gun Debate Segment
conservative videos ^ | 1-4-13 | conservative videos

Posted on 01/04/2013 6:55:13 PM PST by TurboZamboni

Sean Hannity continued the national debate over gun rights tonight with a particular focus on the New York newspaper that published the names and addresses of every gun owner in multiple counties. Guest Leo Terrell was particularly fired up on the issue, and when it looked like he was about to really rage at Hannity, he simply covered his ears with his hands to avoid listening.

(Excerpt) Read more at conservativevideos.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: banglist; democrats; dopeydems; fail; foxnews; guncontrol; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last
fantastic debate tactic. ranks up their with yelling "racist!".
1 posted on 01/04/2013 6:55:23 PM PST by TurboZamboni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Just wait until they start flinging poo ;-)


2 posted on 01/04/2013 6:59:10 PM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

The only thing he forgot to do was start screaming “LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA I CANT HEAR YOU LA LA LA LA LA” etc, etc.


3 posted on 01/04/2013 7:00:14 PM PST by Mr. Impatient (Sneeze loud. Sneeze proud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni
Just like a three year old...another Alinsky tactic. This time we need to ridicule liberals, make them uncomfortable in their ignorance.


4 posted on 01/04/2013 7:00:37 PM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

I hate to use the term “sterotype” but....well, he is a flaming lib. Obviously. When the truth and reality become too much to bear...


5 posted on 01/04/2013 7:00:52 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Remember back in 1970 when the anti-gunners hated handguns so bad they claimed the Miller Decision ONLY protected military style rifles?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Miller

“3. The Second Amendment protects only the ownership of military-type weapons appropriate for use in an organized militia.”

The 1970 claim was handguns and sawed off shotguns were not protected.


6 posted on 01/04/2013 7:01:50 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (GUNS.. the rightful property of freemen, and formidable only to tyrannical governments.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Maybe we should go back to the good old days when most people could have guns — but the laws were designed to make sure uppity Negroes couldn’t have any. Would Leo like that? Does that help him get to where he wants to go?


7 posted on 01/04/2013 7:02:27 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (Nothing will change until after the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

Ha! Or holding their breath.


8 posted on 01/04/2013 7:05:15 PM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

I caught that few minutes. I have always been waiting for a childish respose by a liberal where he holds his hands over his ears and mumbles “I can’t hear you!”, and I actually saw it!


9 posted on 01/04/2013 7:08:54 PM PST by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

10 posted on 01/04/2013 7:08:59 PM PST by RC one (From My Cold Dead Hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Leo is a racist unhinged jerk.


11 posted on 01/04/2013 7:11:18 PM PST by deweyfrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

LoL!


12 posted on 01/04/2013 7:12:48 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Leo Tyrell is another ignorant SoCal leftist. I’m tired of these people. We need to adapt the left’s attitude towards us. Their ultimate aim is to destroy us so we need to make it our aim to destroy them first. It has to be a scorched earth campaign against them. Wishful thinking I know especially with RINOS and other gutless wonders who want compromise with the left but if we’re going to save our country it’s us or them.


13 posted on 01/04/2013 7:16:52 PM PST by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Miller was back in the 30s, right? I remember the decision being embarrassing for overlooking the fact that shotguns were used in WWI. Not that the 2nd amendment is restricted to weapons generally issued by the army and kept under lock and key down at your local national guard headquarters, or whatever the argument is. It’s just that, per usual, they were wrong according to their own rules.

Not that judges have shame.


14 posted on 01/04/2013 7:17:37 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Liberals are really just overgrown children anyway.


15 posted on 01/04/2013 7:29:00 PM PST by headstamp 2 (What would Scooby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
Miller was dead and no one showed up to argue his case before SCOTUS. The court said essentially that a sawed off shotgun could be protected by the 2A if it were a regular militia weapon, but no one presented evidence that it was.

Since Miller was dead, there was no follow up when the case was sent back to the lower court. That was our “landmark” case, very much mischaractorized by the gun grabbers, until Heller. Gray area remains.

16 posted on 01/04/2013 7:29:13 PM PST by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: deweyfrank

I’m surprised that his head hasn’t exploded yet.


17 posted on 01/04/2013 7:34:30 PM PST by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

The number of murders in Chicago would dramatically drop were blacks to not have guns. It’s black on black crime that’s responsible for the vast majority of those murders.


18 posted on 01/04/2013 7:40:42 PM PST by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Yup. People who care about saving the lives of black Americans should consider passing race-based gun control laws which only allow responsible people to have guns.

People who oppose such laws are obviously racists who hate black people.

;)

19 posted on 01/04/2013 7:46:50 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (Nothing will change until after the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Funny how they marched in the streets with shotguns in the 60’s to protest civil rights.

Now they vote for the same son of a bitch that’s wants to take away those rights.

Stupid is as stupid does.


20 posted on 01/04/2013 7:53:49 PM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Well, what a childish little bych he is. Send him to the romper room with his sippy cup of koolaid while the grown-ups continue their discussion.

He probably played the exact same childish stunt when his mommy told him why she couldn’t spend the rent money on toys and candy. Mrs. Terell, is this your child? Please come to the Hannity show and pick up your child, Mrs. Terell...little Leo is out of sorts and needs his nappy time.


21 posted on 01/04/2013 8:12:35 PM PST by fattigermaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

That of course is Leo The Moron who loves OJ Simpson and probably adores every cop killer in the country. Its laughable to see him of the show if any opposing point of view is uttered he starts yelling like nut.


22 posted on 01/04/2013 8:22:16 PM PST by fkabuckeyesrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

It would have been more fun to cut off his audio, and it would have pissed him off more.


23 posted on 01/04/2013 8:45:14 PM PST by JohnD9207 (Isn't freedom worth fighting for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Imagine a fairy tale world where you can tap your heals three times and the impossible happens. Now imagine two fantasy scenarios. You can make your wish and one of these two things will completely disapear from your typical American large city:

Either: All black and Hispanic people.
Or: All guns.

Which would result in a city with fewer murders? Less crime?

It’s fun question to ask libs and watch their heads explode!


24 posted on 01/04/2013 8:46:06 PM PST by Jack Black ( Whatever is left of American patriotism is now identical with counter-revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni
It's past time for Hannity to quit giving liberal nuts air time.
It's also past time for Hannity to quit giving Rinos air time.
Time for him to grow a pair and man up on this regardless of pressure from FOX.
I do believe he is a true conservative, but needs to forget the fair and balanced crap.
Grow up and look around Hannity, fight the bastards 100% of the time, not to do so makes you look disingenuous and only interested in a buck.
25 posted on 01/04/2013 9:11:20 PM PST by The Cajun (Sarah Palin, Mark Levin......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun

Spot on Cajun... but he’ll never do that because he’ll have to forfeit his job. Just like all the others. It’s all a grand show... nothing but WWE wrestling crap.


26 posted on 01/04/2013 9:27:46 PM PST by BobP (The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BobP
Was a big fan of both he and Rush, but no more.
Have defended him and Rush in the past on FR, but no more.
They both fear political correctness too much.
Now is no longer the time to be timid about what the hell is happening to the country.
By not exposing Obama, Rats and Rinos on every issue is being timid.
27 posted on 01/04/2013 9:39:22 PM PST by The Cajun (Sarah Palin, Mark Levin......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
Tublecane said: "Miller was back in the 30s, right? I remember the decision being embarrassing for overlooking the fact that shotguns were used in WWI. "

US v. Miller was in 1939.

The court of original jurisdiction dismissed the case against Layton and Miller on Second Amendment grounds.

The government appealed directly to the Supreme Court which accepted the case.

The Supreme Court was asked by the government to rule that the defendants were not protected by the Second Amendment because they were not members of the Militia.

By failing to respond to this argument, the Supreme Court rejected it. Had it been necessary that Miller was a member of a Militia in order to be protected then no further findings would be necessary.

Instead, the Supreme Court considered the argument by the government that the weapon in question was not suitable for use by a Militia and therefor the Second Amendment didn't protect Miller's use of such a weapon.

The Supreme Court agreed with this argument, but pointed out that it had no information on the record to determine whether the short-barreled shotgun is useful to a Militia. The record was empty because the lower trial court had not found it necessary to examine the issue; no doubt, because the Second Amendment does not say that only some arms are protected.

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the government's appeal of the lower court dismissal and remanded the case back to that court for further findings regarding the nature of the weapon. (Typically, the Supreme Court is a court of appeals and deals with matters of law, using lower court proceedings for determining matters of fact.)

Before any trial was held, one of the defendants took a plea bargain and the other died, so no trial was ever held.

By refusing to take on any other Second Amendment cases, that Supreme Court, and later Supreme Courts, let stand rulings by the various Circuit Courts of Appeal that completely mis-stated the ruling in Miller as one which established that the Second Amendment is a "collective right", which is legal nonsense. This resulted in many courts denying standing to sue the government in Second Amendment cases because nobody qualified as "a Militia".

With the recent Heller decision, the charade has ended and the Second Amendment is recognized as an individual right, the right includes the right to use arms in self-defense, and the later McDonald decision bars infringement of the right by states and municipalities.

28 posted on 01/04/2013 10:11:56 PM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RC one

LOL!


29 posted on 01/04/2013 10:51:04 PM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: onyx; All
The number of murders in Chicago would dramatically drop were blacks to not have guns. It’s black on black crime that’s responsible for the vast majority of those murders.

That is the impossible solution. It is already illegal for nearly all people to have guns in Chicago, yet the criminals have plenty.

The number of murders in Chicago would dramatically drop if all people were allowed to keep and bear arms as required by the Constitution.

There might be a little uptick for a few months while the really violent criminals were weeded out, then the murder rate would drop.

30 posted on 01/05/2013 6:04:35 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun

I wonder if he just came on the show to get a Ruths Chris steak certificate.


31 posted on 01/05/2013 6:36:38 AM PST by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MileHi; All
Miller was a set-up by Judge Ragon who heard the case first. He was an anti-constitutional, anti-gun "progressive" and saw the case as an excellent opportunity to degrade or eliminate the Second Amendment. After Miller, he was on the short list for appointment to the Supreme Court by Roosevelt, but died before he could be appointed.
Part II recounts the history of the case. It shows Jack Miller was a career criminal and government informant. It finds Miller was a Second Amendment test case ar- ranged by the government and designed to support the constitu- tionality of federal gun control. And Part III analyzes Miller in light of this history. This essay concludes that Miller is coherent, but largely ir- relevant to the contemporary debate over the meaning of the Sec- ond Amendment. Miller was a Second Amendment test case, teed up with a nominal defendant by a district judge sympathetic to New Deal gun control measures. But the Supreme Court issued a surprisingly narrow decision. Essentially, it held that the Second Amendment permits Congress to tax firearms used by criminals. While dicta suggest the Second Amendment guarantees an individ- ual right to possess and use a weapon suitable for militia service, dicta are not precedent.7 In other words, Miller did not adopt a the- ory of the Second Amendment guarantee, because it did not need one.

www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/.../ecm_pro_060964.pdf - Cached

32 posted on 01/05/2013 7:37:28 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Interesting.

Thanks


33 posted on 01/05/2013 8:15:29 AM PST by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

God bless you, Jack Black!
I love it!


34 posted on 01/05/2013 9:29:43 AM PST by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Dicta is not officially precedent, but can become so, with more strength than various real rulings, if future judges like it. This was the case with the infamous Footnote Four, which controls constitutional challenges to this day.


35 posted on 01/05/2013 9:33:33 AM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Interesting. The scene transpired as such: Leo Terrell was ranting about how “mentally unstable” individuals should be reported to the authorities and thereby, we would enable the government to prevent them from acquiring weapons of any kind. To which, Sean asked him “You were friends with “OJ Simpson, weren’t you?” which caused Terrell to go off the deep end, yelling “Oh, so NOW you’re bringing in OJ!” and that’s when he covered his ears.

Can’t bring up OJ - that’s racist! LOL


36 posted on 01/05/2013 9:40:43 AM PST by COBOL2Java (kak-is-toc-ra-cy: Government by the least qualified or most unprincipled citizens. See: GOP-e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Very childish. Leo Terrell probably also sucks his thumb and wets his bed ...


37 posted on 01/05/2013 9:41:03 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
The number of murders in Chicago would dramatically drop were blacks to not have guns.

Not likely. They'd just murder each other with knives, blunt instruments, and bare hands and feet.

The problem isn't weapons.

The problem is a completely degenerate urban 'culture', CREATED by the socialist democRat Party vultures in Big Media and Big Government.

38 posted on 01/05/2013 9:44:28 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RC one


Liberals just can't handle the truth.

39 posted on 01/05/2013 9:45:08 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

Miller isn’t much good as a precedent for anything. Miller was dead at the time, and didn’t argue the case. No defense at the supreme court was presented.

The embarrassment is that the federal government prosecuted a case against a dead man. The court recognized that, (duh!) and stated that ‘in the absence of judicial notice....’ meaning that they knew it was true despite being absent from the government’s case.


40 posted on 01/05/2013 10:21:29 AM PST by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: deweyfrank

I wonder why Hannity has him on?


41 posted on 01/05/2013 10:23:00 AM PST by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

LALALALALALA I CAN’T HEEAARRRR YOOOUUUUUUUU!


42 posted on 01/05/2013 10:30:13 AM PST by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni
Actually, I wish more of them would do this.

It would point out who liberals truly are.

43 posted on 01/05/2013 10:37:48 AM PST by Lazamataz (LAZ'S LAW: As an argument with liberals goes on, the probability of being called racist approaches 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

“It alerts neighbors to those who are mentally ill.”

So to this nutbar, owning a gun equals ‘mentally ill?’

How about calling the armed guards you hired mentally ill you nit!


44 posted on 01/05/2013 10:53:45 AM PST by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

45 posted on 01/05/2013 10:55:48 AM PST by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

Definitely cultural, but innocent children wouldn’t be the victims of their drive-by knives, blunt instruments, and bare hands and feet.


46 posted on 01/05/2013 11:12:16 AM PST by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

I don’t think it is though I understand how it could be seen as such. The three wise monkeys are Japanese in origin. Their implications in western culture are much different than their implication in Japanese society. In western civilization, they represent the liberal tendency to turn a blind eye to evil because it is convenient to do so which is exactly what Terrell was doing. That’s what makes it all so apropos.


47 posted on 01/05/2013 12:19:01 PM PST by RC one (From My Cold Dead Hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RC one

It is forbidden in this politically correct world to compare a black person in any way to a monkey or ape no matter how apropos it might seem to a rational person. The only exception to that rule is if the black in question happens to be a conservative. Then any insult is acceptable.


48 posted on 01/05/2013 1:58:51 PM PST by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

oh. my bad. hehehehe


49 posted on 01/05/2013 2:22:08 PM PST by RC one (From My Cold Dead Hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

oh. my bad. hehehehe


50 posted on 01/05/2013 2:38:46 PM PST by RC one (.From My Cold Dead Hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson