Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Without Public Arts Funding, We Wouldn't Have Les Misérables
The Nation ^ | 01/07/2013 | Michelle Dean

Posted on 01/07/2013 9:34:05 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Here is a thing it is difficult to remember in the midst of its box office tidal wave: Les Misérables owes its birth to a debate over public arts funding. We think of blockbusters as antithetical to the high arts that public funding might typically support, but in Les Miz’s case at least, the relationship was symbiotic. Some might say parasitic, of course, but the story reveals that we don’t quite know who was leeching off of who.

Les Misérables was originally staged, in 1985, under the auspices of the Royal Shakespeare Company, a large portion of whose budget was provided by the English Arts Council. It wasn’t the RSC’s idea to develop it, mind you. Cameron Mackintosh, a private producer coming off a wave of success with 1981’s Cats, had been looking to put on an English version of the musical, which was developed and staged in Paris in French. And he wanted a good director for it, and found himself knocking on Trevor Nunn’s door, then the RSC’s co-artistic director.

Nunn and his co-director, John Caird (then an RSC Associate Director), substantially overhauled the plot and the script. They also gave the production what was, until the emaciated cheekbones of Anne Hathaway entered our collective consciousness, the musical’s signature image: the revolving stage. In other words, the look and content of the show was developed not just with public money, but by people who had made their careers in a publicly-supported arts environment.

Blockbusters, onstage and onscreen, are typically seen as ego projects. Production notes present a narrative of the great director who wants to implement his vision. Nunn, however, clearly had his eye on another prize altogether.

(Excerpt) Read more at thenation.com ...


TOPICS: Music/Entertainment; Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: lesmiserables; publicfunding; thearts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: SeekAndFind

Kill all public funding of arts!!!

i ashcanned music 65 years ago and haven’t been to a movie in 54 years.


21 posted on 01/07/2013 9:54:53 AM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Les Mis is a fine play.
It has been produced thousands of times, on all sorts of stages, without massive federal tax subsidies.

(And I agree with everyone else, our tax money should not be paying for entertainments, even plays I like... it is wrong, immoral, and very very “unfair” to steal money from my neighbors to pay for my theatre tickets!)


22 posted on 01/07/2013 10:02:46 AM PST by faithhopecharity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I didn’t care for the play and probably won’t see the movie.


23 posted on 01/07/2013 10:07:18 AM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What nonsense. The book was written without government underwriting. If someone saw profit potential in bringing it to the stage, they could do so (obviously) without government funding. And they could make a lot more money.


24 posted on 01/07/2013 10:08:15 AM PST by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

RE: . If someone saw profit potential in bringing it to the stage, they could do so (obviously) without government funding. And they could make a lot more money.

Same principle applies to Sesame Street.


25 posted on 01/07/2013 10:14:41 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
A logical fallacy of statists is that if someone gets a government grant for a project that the project would have been impossible without the government grant. A lot of times they just poison good projects with the stink of government bureaucracy by giving away money to both good and bad projects at far better terms (free money? sounds good to me!) than any bank or investor would lend.

Could Big Bird exist without being on the dole? Sure, but by putting some money in the government can hold the bird hostage every time the mean old Republicans talk about budget cuts.

26 posted on 01/07/2013 10:15:15 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Choose one: the yellow and black flag of the Tea Party or the white flag of the Republican Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Persevero
And they could make a lot more money.

If you can get a government grant at either better terms than a bank would give or even for free with no repayment at all, you get bigger profit than if you got that money from a bank or an investor. Such is the nasty siren song of socialism and fascism.

27 posted on 01/07/2013 10:18:43 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Choose one: the yellow and black flag of the Tea Party or the white flag of the Republican Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Parmenio

True, indeed.

Generally, at least in the US, commercial producers do a great deal toward supporting nonprofit theaters by paying them to mount tryouts of their new shows. If the show is a hit, the nonprofit stands to make quite a bit more money, through deals far more favorable to them than the RSC’s. This woman seems completely oblivious to this practice in the US, and yet somehow she offers her opinion as to how government should fund more government-favored arts.


28 posted on 01/07/2013 10:20:14 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

Cameron Mackintosh wasn’t running any sort of charity, but he got good bang for his buck teaming with the RSC.


29 posted on 01/07/2013 10:23:07 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

And mediocrity won’t get you everything, but it will get you pretty far


30 posted on 01/07/2013 10:25:16 AM PST by Mr. K (There are lies, dammed lies, statistics, and democrap talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

RE: The book was written without government underwriting.

___________________________________

Yep. And Victor Hugo was not even sure if Les Miserables was going to be a commercial success.

The shortest correspondence in history is said to have been between Hugo and his publisher Hurst and Blackett in 1862.

Hugo was on vacation when Les Misérables was published. He queried the reaction to the work by sending a single-character telegram to his publisher, asking “?”.

The publisher replied with a single “!” to indicate its success.


31 posted on 01/07/2013 10:39:53 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

How ironic that the theme of Victor Hugo’s work deals with a revolt against a tyrant.

Seems were there again!


32 posted on 01/07/2013 10:40:52 AM PST by Dick Bachert (An ARMED society is a POLITE society!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Were = we’re! Duuhhh


33 posted on 01/07/2013 10:41:47 AM PST by Dick Bachert (An ARMED society is a POLITE society!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

I doubt Les Miz the stage production in the US of A got any arts grant monies and it was fabulous and I saw a stage production twice. Also saw the movie, although with some lesser singers, it was extremely well done in following the story and great scenery that fit the story. I have never read “Les Miserables” by Victor Hugo; however, my neighbor who is Haitian read “Les Miserables” in French in HS in Haiti and in college in New York in English. It’s well worth anyone’s time to see the movie.


34 posted on 01/07/2013 10:43:15 AM PST by Cordio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Nuf said

“When even a writer for Mother Jones can’t help but think your attempt at pro-Obama propaganda is problematic, you know you’ve done something wrong. Such is the case with makers of “One Term More,” an Obama-themed parody of “One Day More,” the famously dramatic Act I finale of the iconic Broadway Musical “Les Miserables.””

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/one-term-more-is-this-the-worst-pro-obama-video-yet/

Criticing ths piece of crap...
Les Mis ‘one term more’
http://www.onetermmore.com/video_subtitles.html


35 posted on 01/07/2013 10:47:39 AM PST by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If the government didn’t take so much money, people would be able to pay for their own entertainment.


36 posted on 01/07/2013 10:48:28 AM PST by AZLiberty (No tag today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cordio

It didn’t. It was a commercial production here.


37 posted on 01/07/2013 11:15:32 AM PST by alphadoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Right... And without the NEA we wouldn’t have Elmo; making preschoolers incapable of learning their ABC’s. Without the dedicated work of ‘The Count’ America’s youth will be heard saying, “One, another, another, another, another...”

Yes, lacking the never ending taxpayer Christmas PBS would wither away- leaving Dora The Explorer no choice but to consider actually migrating back to Mexico. ‘Austin City Limits’ would end up having to move too. Like, 50’ past the sign and outside of Austin. Or maybe Amarillo, Arlington, or San Angelo.

Worse, PBS wouldn’t have aired ‘The New Yankee Workshow’ and without the cameras Norm would have been less careful and have lost at least 3-4 fingers by now!


38 posted on 01/07/2013 11:19:02 AM PST by Made In The USA (I'm not yelling, just... just talking enthusiastically..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

“Such is the nasty siren song of socialism and fascism. “

I don’t know, I think the siren call is “safety.”

If it’s someone else’s money, there’s so much less risk, thus, less chances are taken. The arts become far less interesting and much “safer” and I don’t mean “less pornographic,” I just mean more predictable and playing to please a board of directors which gives grants.

If you have a patron, you’re trying to please the patron. If the patron rewards excellence (they all don’t), then, we all benefit. Great art is produced.

If you’re on your own, you either “sell out” for commercial success (which sometimes produces great art) or keep your artistic integrity and remain true to your vision. So great art was often produced, but, I guess, not any more, we have to keep it safe and steal from taxpayers in order to subsidize it.


39 posted on 01/07/2013 11:20:03 AM PST by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cordio

Agree!...the story of redemption is a powerful one!


40 posted on 01/07/2013 11:27:17 AM PST by Guenevere (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson