Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Miss America contestant pursuing double mastectomy
Assoc. Press ^ | 01/11/2013 | HANNAH DREIER, Associated Press

Posted on 01/11/2013 4:35:40 PM PST by Responsibility2nd

LAS VEGAS (AP) — Win or lose Saturday, Miss America contestant Allyn Rose will have conveyed a message about breast cancer prevention using her primary tool as a beauty queen: her body.

The 24-year-old Miss DC plans to undergo a double mastectomy after she struts in a bikini and flaunts her roller skating talent. She is removing both breasts as a preventive measure to reduce her chances of developing the disease that killed her mother, grandmother and great aunt.

"My mom would have given up every part of her body to be here for me, to watch me in the pageant," she said between dress rehearsals and preliminary competitions at Planet Hollywood on the Las Vegas Strip Wednesday. "If there's something that I can do to be proactive, it might hurt my body, it might hurt my physical beauty, but I'm going to be alive."

If crowned, the University of Maryland, College Park politics major could become the first Miss America not endowed with the Barbie silhouette associated with beauty queens.

Rose said it was her father who first broached the subject, during her freshman year of college, two years after the death of her mother

"I said, 'Dad I'm not going to do that. I like the body I have.' He got serious and said, 'Well then you're going to end up dead like your mom.' "

She has pondered that conversation for the past three years, during which she has worked as a model and won several pageants, including Miss Maryland USA, Miss Sinergy and the Miss District of Columbia competition, which put her in the running for Saturday's bonanza.

(Excerpt) Read more at rr.com ...


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: mastectomy

 

Oh, the Humanity!


1 posted on 01/11/2013 4:35:46 PM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

 

She should reconsider. At least till she's 30 and gravity takes over.

2 posted on 01/11/2013 4:38:23 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

>>She is removing both breasts as a preventive measure to reduce her chances of developing the disease that killed her mother, grandmother and great aunt.<<

I have never heard of prophylactic mastectomies before this. Does anyone know if it usually done?


3 posted on 01/11/2013 4:42:14 PM PST by freedumb2003 (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

My BS meter is off the chart. No one would do this with no symptoms.
Me thinks the babe is trying to win on the sympathy vote.


4 posted on 01/11/2013 4:46:08 PM PST by taillightchaser (When a dimorat says"The American people" the next words will be a lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Seems to me that reconstruction would be 99% if she has it done now... They could preserve the nipples and the skin and remove all the mammary tissue.


5 posted on 01/11/2013 4:48:11 PM PST by babygene ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

So then she has taken all the tests to identify markers for breast cancer - right?
I personally think this is beyond stupid.
There are so many tests a woman can do for early diagnosis - sonograms, blood.....
But it is keeping her name in the papers.


6 posted on 01/11/2013 4:49:25 PM PST by svcw (Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

It’s done all the time . My docs were all on board , especially with rationing coming down the pike .


7 posted on 01/11/2013 4:49:25 PM PST by katykelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

“I have never heard of prophylactic mastectomies before this. Does anyone know if it usually done?”

Yes...


8 posted on 01/11/2013 4:49:45 PM PST by babygene ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

My sil had cancer in one and had both removed. I thnk her idea was symmetry She has adjusted very well fours after the fact


9 posted on 01/11/2013 4:50:20 PM PST by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

That is a good question. I do know women with cancer in one breast who elect to have BOTH breasts removed. Just in case.

To be done with it.


10 posted on 01/11/2013 4:51:03 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

a local MD had this done to herself several years ago.

Breast Cancer was among her family females


11 posted on 01/11/2013 4:51:32 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

a local MD had this done to herself several years ago.

Breast Cancer was rampant among her family females


12 posted on 01/11/2013 4:51:56 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: taillightchaser
Me thinks the babe is trying to win on the sympathy vote.

I can offer her therapeutic massage breast reduction for dimes on the dollar if that will help...

13 posted on 01/11/2013 4:52:59 PM PST by freedumb2003 (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: svcw
undoubtedly she had the genetic tests done and there's her maternal track record ~ 3 dead!

Sounds quite reasonable to get'em out of there and replace the content with a better track record.

The same gene(s) can be related to the misnamed ovarian cancer (actually happens in the supportive tissue, not the ovaries) ~ and I'd bet she has been tested in that regard as well.

14 posted on 01/11/2013 4:53:58 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

The first time I heard of this was a friend of my niece. She plans to have it done after having children. I was stunned, but apparently it is not uncommon.


15 posted on 01/11/2013 4:58:28 PM PST by Montanabound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: babygene

They take the nipples . They can become cancer bearers . They reconstruct new ones . Lots of women get tats .


16 posted on 01/11/2013 5:01:12 PM PST by katykelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I’m a man in my sixties... 5 years ago I had a lump in my breast. They said probably OK, we’ll watch it. 3 years later it was bigger and they said we’ll watch it.

I said, kiss my a$$. cut the damn thing out. Which they did...


17 posted on 01/11/2013 5:03:21 PM PST by babygene ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: katykelly

I don’t think they need to take the nipples. I’m not a Dr. but the chance of a future problem with the nipple spreading to the chest wall through 2 pounds of silicon is zero.


18 posted on 01/11/2013 5:08:11 PM PST by babygene ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: taillightchaser

There’s a test (BRAC1 AND BRAC2) to test for a genetic link to breast and ovarian cancer. Maybe she’s had the test and it showed she’s genetically prone to those.


19 posted on 01/11/2013 5:11:07 PM PST by Shimmer1 (No matter how cynical I get, I just can't keep up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: katykelly

I am a bit ignorant on the subject....is it commonly done with women in their early 20’s, or is it more often women, with genetic likelyhood, getting it done as they turn 50?


20 posted on 01/11/2013 5:12:10 PM PST by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: taillightchaser

http://www.webmd.com/breast-cancer/guide/preventive-mastectomy

My grandmother died from breast cancer. If this was an option back then, she would have done it. And, no, it is not BS. There are women in their early 20s who are opting for this as a matter of survival.


21 posted on 01/11/2013 5:16:00 PM PST by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: babygene

My mother died Oct. 30 . I had my surgery Dec. 18 . They take the nipples and you still have to have mammograms . Cancer can appear above or below the silicone . There are plenty of BC forums that are very informative .


22 posted on 01/11/2013 5:16:55 PM PST by katykelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: taillightchaser

You obviously don’t keep up with the current trends in breast cancer prevention and treatment. This has become very common and with her family history makes total sense.


23 posted on 01/11/2013 5:22:05 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

hum? I had ovarian cancer, the docs found stage 3 cancer in my ovaries.
Oh, well it’s been 25 years, now.
My daughter has had all those tests, and has no markers.
(because my maternal aunt may have died from breast cancer)


24 posted on 01/11/2013 5:25:15 PM PST by svcw (Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: babygene

“.. 5 years ago I had a lump in my breast...”

I am glad you had the lump removed. Even men can get breast cancer (it is rarer but it does happen)


25 posted on 01/11/2013 5:26:13 PM PST by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: katykelly

“Lots of women get tats.”

This is a serious subject so I will not make the obvious play on words...that’s similar to Toys for Tots.


26 posted on 01/11/2013 5:30:18 PM PST by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Glad you made a full recovery, svcw. God was with you.


27 posted on 01/11/2013 5:33:18 PM PST by CatherineofAragon (Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice

A woman having her breasts removed YEARS and even DECADES before she MIGHT develop breast cancer is NOT a “matter of survival”.


28 posted on 01/11/2013 6:12:56 PM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

I think I might be nauseous some day, so why don’t I just throw up right now and be done with it...


29 posted on 01/11/2013 6:18:18 PM PST by Migraine (Diversity is great; until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
A woman having her breasts removed YEARS and even DECADES before she MIGHT develop breast cancer is NOT a “matter of survival”

I know two young women who had it done. I can assure you that it wasn't done for cosmetic reasons.

30 posted on 01/11/2013 6:18:30 PM PST by Alaska Wolf (Carry a Gun, It's a Lighter Burden Than Regret)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

OK Dr.

Whatever you say.


31 posted on 01/11/2013 6:23:50 PM PST by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I went to the University of MD and never saw anything like that walking around campus....


32 posted on 01/11/2013 6:23:59 PM PST by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babygene
You might be right. My wife had a double mastectomy after having had a lumpectomy on one side and going through chemo and and radiation. She regrets the double to this day bit she didn't want to go through anymore after alump was found on the other side. She said “take them both. But it has been 15 years cancer free. Totally worth it to me.
33 posted on 01/11/2013 6:29:59 PM PST by subterfuge (CBS NBC ABC FOX AP-- all no different than Pravda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

I haven’t been on any of the 20 yr. old boards so don’t know how common it is . Just 30 to 50 .


34 posted on 01/11/2013 6:41:05 PM PST by katykelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

If your uncle, your father, and your grandfather all died of pinkie cancer and your own tests showed you have all the genes leading to pinkie cancer, I bet you would be walking around with eight fingers right now....


35 posted on 01/11/2013 6:41:54 PM PST by Eepsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Eepsy

Maybe. But ONLY IF they died of pinkie cancer while in the early 20’s.

I think the point is that developing breast cancer is a very high risk for Miss Rose. But not at her age.


36 posted on 01/11/2013 6:55:24 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Eepsy

And you would be wrong. I have a very good idea of what will kill me from my family history. I would not choose surgery if I were not actually ill, however. Also, with the rapid developments going on in medicine, this is just an overreaction to what has not happened, may not happened, and might soon be relatively easily fixed. I can understand a woman choosing to be very, very vigilant if her family has a long history of breast cancer, but to have your breasts removed when you might never even develop the disease makes no sense.


37 posted on 01/11/2013 6:58:41 PM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

One of my former employees just had this done.....she is in her late 30s and I was stunned when she told me about her plans. Her mother died in her mid-50s of breast cancer after battling it for years.....and my ex-employee had the “genetic markers” which she said made her like 95 percent disposed to getting breast cancer.......just my two cents.


38 posted on 01/11/2013 7:13:34 PM PST by levon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: levon

My mom actually had 2 different types of breast cancers. Actually killed her when she was in her 70’s after 15 yrs of treatment. Not planning to cut mine off until there is a reason.


39 posted on 01/11/2013 7:35:39 PM PST by happyhomemaker (Rejoice in hope, be patient in tribulation, be constant in prayer. Rom 12:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I saw a bunch of shady people in College Park when I stayed for a weekend. I was in a low rent area.


40 posted on 01/11/2013 7:37:11 PM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: katykelly

” Cancer can appear above or below the silicone .”

I agree, however if it appeared above the silicone it would be easy to detect and very unlikely to spread to the chest wall before it was detected. JMHO...


41 posted on 01/11/2013 10:20:39 PM PST by babygene ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: taillightchaser

I know a couple of women who have done just that for the same reason. My step cousin was thinking about doing just that. Her grandmother, Aunt, and mom (twice breast cancer). Then she got diagnosed last year. Doing great by the way.


42 posted on 01/12/2013 3:26:45 AM PST by waxer1 (A Republic if you can keep it--Benjamin Franklin. Well we lost it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice
My grandmother died from breast cancer. If this was an option back then, she would have done it. And, no, it is not BS. There are women in their early 20s who are opting for this as a matter of survival.

Our neighbor across the street lost her mother to breast cancer about one year ago. She had tests done several weeks ago and there was a 90% chance she was carrying the same gene and would develop breast cancer. She is in the hospital this week getting double mastectomy.

43 posted on 01/12/2013 7:21:06 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (0 bummer inherited a worse economy in 2012 than he did in 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: taillightchaser

Yes, this is my first post here. As a conservative, I frequently lurk here.

I finally decided to join because some of the responses on this thread are ludicrous.

First thing I would like to point out is that mammograms are only 85% to 90% effective in finding breast cancers. The denser the breast, the more difficult it is to detect. This means that a younger woman with firm, dense breast tissue is more likely to have her cancer go undetected. Her risk would be much great than the numbers above. Secondly, younger women who do get cancer tend to get more aggressive types of cancer. Factor in a genetic predisposition to breast cancer, and perhaps you might better understand her decision.

I personally have breast cancer right now. My second time. My first cancer was invasive ductal cancer, early stage and opted for a lumpectomy and radiation, and now my second cancer is invasive lobular cancer, stage 2b, and have recently undergone a bilateral mastectomy.

My chest is terribly disfigured.

Because of lymph nodes removal, I am at risk of lymphodema. (Look it up - large swollen arms or chest.) Lymphodema can last a life time and seriously affect the quality of a woman’s life. I now have blood draws and IVs placed in my foot to decrease my risk of lymphodema.

I will soon undergo radiation, which will burn my skin and towards the end make me tired. I had radiation years ago, and, frankly, it was not horrible.

I will then undergo chemotherapy, which if I’m lucky won’t make me too sick. There’s some great new drugs out there today which helps with this.

Unfortunately, I will likely lose my hair.

After that I will spend five years or more on one of the targeted hormone therapies, which also come with possible side effects that range from mild to deadly. (Hot flashes and body aches to heart attacks and lung damage.)

If I do well, I can have fake boobs and fake nipples replace the real ones. Sure, I might have great cleavage, but I will have NO feeling in my tatooed-on nipples and most of my breasts. In order to have nice breasts, I might have anywhere from three to seven or eight “procedures” (read surgeries) to get it right.

Basically, my husband is now married to a woman with a mutilated chest who will soon be bald. His wife will never have sexual feelings again in her breasts even if she does reconstruction. I am blessed that he is a godly man who is standing by me. Not every woman with cancer is that lucky.

I write this not for pity (although I do ask for prayer), but because I believe the general public is unaware of many of the issues surrounding breast cancer.

The fact is mammograms and other methods of detection just don’t catch all breast cancers, which is the real reason why most of these women will undergo prophylactic mastectomies. And, of courses, the sooner a woman starts with yearly mammograms, the more radiation she exposes herself to. :(

Now, you might want to question your “BS meter.”
This young woman is doing what is right for her. God bless her.


44 posted on 01/15/2013 9:35:07 AM PST by GSD Lover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson