Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Republican Threatens Impeachment over Gun Control
house.gov ^ | Steve Stockman

Posted on 01/14/2013 2:13:04 PM PST by JohnPDuncan

WASHINGTON – Congressman Steve Stockman (R-Texas 36th) released the following statement Monday afternoon.

The White House’s recent announcement they will use executive orders and executive actions to infringe on our constitutionally-protected right to keep and bear arms is an unconstitutional and unconscionable attack on the very founding principles of this republic.

I will seek to thwart this action by any means necessary, including but not limited to eliminating funding for implementation, defunding the White House, and even filing articles of impeachment.

The President’s actions are an existential threat to this nation. The right of the people to keep and bear arms is what has kept this nation free and secure for over 200 years. The very purpose of the Second Amendment is to stop the government from disallowing people the means to defend themselves against tyranny. Any proposal to abuse executive power and infringe upon gun rights must be repelled with the stiffest legislative force possible.

Under no circumstances whatsoever may the government take any action that disarms any peaceable person – much less without due process through an executive declaration without a vote of Congress or a ruling of a court.

The President’s actions are not just an attack on the Constitution and a violation of his sworn oath of office – they are a direct attack on Americans that place all of us in danger. If the President is allowed to suspend constitutional rights on his own personal whims, our free republic has effectively ceased to exist.

# # #


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: banglist; congress; criminalpresident; gop; guncontrol; impeach; impeachment; obama; secondamendment; texas; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-62 next last

1 posted on 01/14/2013 2:13:09 PM PST by JohnPDuncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

Now, THAT is something I will take vacation and march in support to Washington.


2 posted on 01/14/2013 2:15:56 PM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan
And, honorable Stockman, trials and prison for those supporting the President in this action. These are the right and honorable steps to take, not taking up arms. I WILL march in support of that kind of action. Finally, we have a statesman rising to the occasion.

Stockman for President!

3 posted on 01/14/2013 2:17:45 PM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

I will be there also! Impeach the Constitution Stomper now!


4 posted on 01/14/2013 2:17:57 PM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Now there are two I can listen to in Congress, Paul Ryan and this fellow.


5 posted on 01/14/2013 2:19:22 PM PST by JAKraig (Surely my religion is at least as good as yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

If you care to read a few words out of that “little book”, as CNN’s Piers Morgan recently described it, you will find the Constitution was written solely to form a government so that we might enjoy the blessings of liberty. That government was designed from the bottom up with limited powers in order to protect the rights the Creator gives to all humans by right of birth, rights that exist outside of any government.

Members of the media understand that a free press is essential to preserve liberty and protect the country from a government run amok. What member of the media would have said we must preserve the First Amendment just in case some future president attempts to subvert the electoral process or we need to publish some classified Pentagon papers about a costly war? Previously the First was best known for shielding the publishing of pornography. Yet if it had not been for the reporting of Woodward and Burstein during the Watergate coverup, or Daniel Ellsberg’s publishing of a classified study about the Vietnam War who knows what other outrages would have followed?

The right to freely publish expression in speech, media and in internet commentary is such a precious component of protecting our liberties from a government run amok that it is my duty to pass the First Amendment on to my grandchildren just in case some future outrage threatens the country.

Similarly, just because I may not need to fully exercise the pre-existing rights recognized in the Second Amendment that doesn’t relieve me of the duty and obligation to pass those rights fully and unencumbered to my grandchildren just in case they must exercise them to protect their liberty.

The truth is that nobody can know how or why some future government will attempt to break free of the powers the Constitution limits it to, nor how it may abuse the enumerated powers it clearly has. So while I may not really need this particular style of rifle at this moment anymore than I really need 30, 10, or even five or six pages or as few a three or one of Husler Magazine. I am obligated to make sure my children and grandchildren can freely exercise those very same rights or else I have not been a good citizen, nor even a good parent.


6 posted on 01/14/2013 2:20:22 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

defund the white house, hell I;d love to see that, this free loading family paying their own tpilet rolls, food, drinks , parties, and electric , maybe then the dumb iidot might understand the standard of living has got very expensive


7 posted on 01/14/2013 2:21:18 PM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

defund the white house, hell I;d love to see that, this free loading family paying their own tpilet rolls, food, drinks , parties, and electric , maybe then the dumb iidot might understand the standard of living has got very expensive


8 posted on 01/14/2013 2:21:22 PM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

Straight forward and easy to understand.

Excellent!


9 posted on 01/14/2013 2:23:33 PM PST by JimBianchi11 (The 2A is the cornerstone of our free society. Those that don't support it, oppose it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

Good ol’ Texas Republicans. Glad I’m from this State.


10 posted on 01/14/2013 2:25:35 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

If I remember....that’s what the king was doing...hence....the revolutionary war came into full bloom.


11 posted on 01/14/2013 2:26:17 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

I just called (202-225-1555) congressman Stockman’s office in DC. Spoke w/a very pleasant gentleman and thanked him for the congressman’s comments. Call his office to show your support. This country is still run by the “people”, but we need to show our representatives that we will back them when they are willing to challenge obama.


12 posted on 01/14/2013 2:28:09 PM PST by Son-Joshua (son-joshua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

[[I will seek to thwart this action by any means necessary]]

Really congressan? Just liek you sought to ‘thwart’ the supreme court and the administration from trampling our constitutional rights with obamacare3?

Pffff- not holding my breath- we’ll see how seriosu you are when the government withholds federal money from your state- You and hte rest of hte republicans ALLOWED the administration to trampel our constitutional rights already, and you allowed the administration to bully the supreme court into making a FALSE judgement that stripped us of our rights- so yeah- not impre4ssed with yor claim congressman


13 posted on 01/14/2013 2:30:38 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

God bless Congressman Stockman and God bless Texas!


14 posted on 01/14/2013 2:33:32 PM PST by MurrietaMadman (Stop with the negative waves, Moriarity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

I bet Boehner is having a heart attack about now. My God, this Texan might actually take action, can’t have that, not politically correct, too strong, causing trouble, can’t do it, don’t rock the boat, etc.


15 posted on 01/14/2013 2:34:31 PM PST by Marcella (Prepping can save your life today. Going Galt is freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son-Joshua

Glad to hear someone standing up to Obama’s power grab.


16 posted on 01/14/2013 2:34:57 PM PST by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

Rep. Stockman better be sure he has the backing of the GOP leadership before putting out such a statement.

Otherwise, it could blow up in his face.

==

That said, I do admire his stand on the issue. It is more than many of the jelly-for-spine Pubbies have spoken.


17 posted on 01/14/2013 2:41:52 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

Well, we here pretty much all agree with him and hope he stands by his words.

Now lets watch the GOP either back him as they should constitutionally do (since he’s right) or cave as usual.

Not getting my hopes up.


18 posted on 01/14/2013 2:50:19 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan
We've got plenty of first-hand experience in fighting tyrants down here. More so than probably any other state. Molon Labe. Photobucket
19 posted on 01/14/2013 2:53:13 PM PST by lgjhn23 (It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat

“that doesn’t relieve me of the duty and obligation to pass those rights fully and unencumbered to my grandchildren just in case they must exercise them to protect their liberty.”

Don’t sweat it: sure, they’ll lose their ability to protect themselves...but just look at all the wonderful debt the Feds are creating for them, instead.


20 posted on 01/14/2013 2:54:03 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny (Thought Puzzle: Describe Islam without using the phrase "mental disorder" more than four times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

Better late than never but they will need great force to complete the job in the Senate.


21 posted on 01/14/2013 2:56:52 PM PST by bmwcyle (We have gone over the cliff and we are about to hit the bottom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan
I would suspect that Steve Stockman will be taken on a trip to the woodshed by John Boehner and the GOP-E and chastised severely.
22 posted on 01/14/2013 3:04:01 PM PST by Tupelo (Hunkered down & loading up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan
Now that is the kind of Republican I can support....


23 posted on 01/14/2013 3:08:14 PM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan
Now that is the kind of Republican I can support....


24 posted on 01/14/2013 3:08:35 PM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

If they are going to impeach the “Constitution Stomper” they should also throw out those that did not question his eligibility, or lack thereof.


25 posted on 01/14/2013 3:15:14 PM PST by 353FMG ( I refuse to specify whether I am serious or sarcastic -- I respect FReepers too much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

But at least, the TX GOP is unlikely to do to Stockman what the FL GOP did to Allen West.


26 posted on 01/14/2013 3:17:01 PM PST by rfp1234 (Arguing with a liberal is like playing chess with a pigeon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
Old buddy =

Better late than never but they will need great force miracles to complete the job in the Senate.

27 posted on 01/14/2013 3:18:34 PM PST by KC Burke (Plain Conservative opinions and common sense correction for thirteen years. RSC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke

The C students might fall for Jedi mind tricks.


28 posted on 01/14/2013 3:24:25 PM PST by bmwcyle (We have gone over the cliff and we are about to hit the bottom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

I called Stockman’s office to thank him. A very nice man answered and said they hoped it wouldn’t come to it, but, if necessary, Stockman feels strongly enough to follow through on this. Although my Texas congressman is pretty conservative, I can’t imagine him doing anything like this. (Hopefully, he’ll support Stockman, though.)


29 posted on 01/14/2013 3:28:31 PM PST by MomofMarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lgjhn23
Freedom worked pretty well for over 200 years, protected by the 2nd Amd. Be a shame to drop Liberty's torch on our watch...


30 posted on 01/14/2013 3:33:17 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MomofMarine

“...I called Stockman’s office to thank him....”

I contacted mine too and asked him to stand up with Rep. Stockman and back him on this all the way.


31 posted on 01/14/2013 3:36:27 PM PST by lgjhn23 (It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

What, a Republican LEADER with COURAGE???

I will look to financially support Stockman in any future election he may have.


32 posted on 01/14/2013 3:43:05 PM PST by Obadiah (Those who will not hear the messengers of peace, shall be made to hear the messengers of war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan
Thank you, Congressman Steve Stockman (R-Texas 36th), for saying what those you represent need to have said!

I hope your colleagues, especially those from my state, join with you in this effort.

I'll do all I can to encourage them. United, we stand.

33 posted on 01/14/2013 3:44:34 PM PST by GBA (Here in the Matrix, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

Click on his website and send him $5 or $10.


34 posted on 01/14/2013 3:47:48 PM PST by Obadiah (Those who will not hear the messengers of peace, shall be made to hear the messengers of war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah
What, a Republican LEADER with COURAGE??? I will look to financially support Stockman in any future election he may have.

As will I.

GOD to get rid of the Kenyan userper would be a dream come true. I will never forgive all the dumb asses in this country who put this POS back in.

35 posted on 01/14/2013 3:47:48 PM PST by Marathoner (Our forefathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

So, instead of slavery at the point of a gun, it will be slavery by men in suits who impose confiscatory taxes to pay the interest on the money we have borrowed to pay for the Leviathan Welfare-Warfare state.

It is a form of tyranny that humanity has no prior historical experience with, especially when combined with electronic fiat money, taxes on income including “income” that comes from inflated dollar value of assets, and the total surveillance of financial accounts, even those located outside the territory of the country.

It is serfdom in slow motion as tax freedom day moves from April into May and beyond.


36 posted on 01/14/2013 3:52:52 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

Amen!

What’s even more disgusting, however:

“If the President is allowed to suspend constitutional rights on his own personal whims, our free republic has effectively ceased to exist.”

Is that it’s gotten THIS FAR, AFTER all the Constitutional Rights Stomping Zero pulled in his first term.

Statesman: See above article

Politician: See most everyone Else in DC


37 posted on 01/14/2013 3:57:47 PM PST by To-Whose-Benefit? (It is Error alone which needs the support of Government. The Truth can stand by itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan
The President’s actions are not just an attack on the Constitution and a violation of his sworn oath of office – they are a direct attack on Americans that place all of us in danger. If the President is allowed to suspend constitutional rights on his own personal whims, our free republic has effectively ceased to exist.

An attack on the Constitution? This congressman is a fraud and a coward, just like the rest of the GOP. An entire nation of gutless cowards.

Supreme Court cases that cite “natural born Citizen” as one born on U.S. soil to citizen parents:

The Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 253 (1814)

Vattel, who, though not very full to this point, is more explicit and more satisfactory on it than any other whose work has fallen into my hands, says: “The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives or indigenes are those born in the country of parents who are citizens. Society not being able to subsist and to perpetuate itself but by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.

Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 3 Pet. 242 242 (1830)

Ann Scott was born in South Carolina before the American revolution, and her father adhered to the American cause and remained and was at his death a citizen of South Carolina. There is no dispute that his daughter Ann, at the time of the Revolution and afterwards, remained in South Carolina until December, 1782. Whether she was of age during this time does not appear. If she was, then her birth and residence might be deemed to constitute her by election a citizen of South Carolina. If she was not of age, then she might well be deemed under the circumstances of this case to hold the citizenship of her father, for children born in a country, continuing while under age in the family of the father, partake of his national character as a citizen of that country. Her citizenship, then, being prima facie established, and indeed this is admitted in the pleadings, has it ever been lost, or was it lost before the death of her father, so that the estate in question was, upon the descent cast, incapable of vesting in her? Upon the facts stated, it appears to us that it was not lost and that she was capable of taking it at the time of the descent cast.

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)

The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As society cannot perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their parents, and succeed to all their rights.' Again: 'I say, to be of the country, it is necessary to be born of a person who is a citizen; for if he be born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. . . .

Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875)

The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children, born in a country of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.

Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939),

Was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a child born in the United States to naturalized parents on U.S. soil is a natural born citizen and that the child's natural born citizenship is not lost if the child is taken to and raised in the country of the parents' origin, provided that upon attaining the age of majority, the child elects to retain U.S. citizenship "and to return to the United States to assume its duties." Not only did the court rule that she did not lose her native born Citizenship but it upheld the lower courts decision that she is a "natural born Citizen of the United States" because she was born in the USA to two naturalized U.S. Citizens.

But the Secretary of State, according to the allegation of the bill of complaint, had refused to issue a passport to Miss Elg 'solely on the ground that she had lost her native born American citizenship.' The court below, properly recognizing the existence of an actual controversy with the defendants [307 U.S. 325, 350] (Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227 , 57 S.Ct. 461, 108 A.L.R. 1000), declared Miss Elg 'to be a natural born citizen of the United States' (99 F.2d 414) and we think that the decree should include the Secretary of State as well as the other defendants. The decree in that sense would in no way interfere with the exercise of the Secretary's discretion with respect to the issue of a passport but would simply preclude the denial of a passport on the sole ground that Miss Elg had lost her American citizenship."

The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”.

38 posted on 01/14/2013 3:58:52 PM PST by Godebert (No Person Except a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
Not getting my hopes up.

Me neither. I believe if it was up to boner, this guy would be found in Fort Marcy Park with two or three bullet holes in the back of his head (suicide).

FMCDH(BITS)

39 posted on 01/14/2013 4:12:03 PM PST by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

Huzzah! Huzzah! Huzzah!


40 posted on 01/14/2013 4:16:12 PM PST by Temujinshordes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

Bump!


41 posted on 01/14/2013 4:16:23 PM PST by Ignatz (Winner of a prestigious 1960 Y-chromosome award!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

Good for this guy! He’s got more guts than most of the snakes that slither in and out of that building. I just hope he watches his back - - GOP “leaders” like Boehner will be out to shut him up by any means necessary.


42 posted on 01/14/2013 4:16:40 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

I’m moving to Texas.


43 posted on 01/14/2013 4:24:37 PM PST by Rappini (Veritas vos Liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lgjhn23

Stockman’s gov site has the “Come and take it” cannon on it!
Too bad I couldn’t send him an email from there - but I WILL contact him to show support.


44 posted on 01/14/2013 4:33:51 PM PST by RebelTXRose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

SOMEONE is standing up to the traitorous, totalitarian POSOTUS? Are there any OTHER Americans left in Congress?

HOORAY Congressman Steve Stockman (R-Texas 36th)!


45 posted on 01/14/2013 4:35:38 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

BTTT!


46 posted on 01/14/2013 4:38:53 PM PST by bayouranger (The 1st victim of islam is the person who practices the lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

I can’t argue with your post, CottShop. Thanks. I have said many times of late, that we have zero representation in Congress. I stand by that assessment.


47 posted on 01/14/2013 4:48:40 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CottShop
Really congressan? Just liek you sought to ‘thwart’ the supreme court and the administration from trampling our constitutional rights with obamacare3?

You don't know what you are talking about.

Stockman was last in the House in 1997 and was just elected in Nov. 2012 for the first time since then.

How quick you are to falsely criticize one of our only patriots in the House.

48 posted on 01/14/2013 5:00:14 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan

BTTT!
(Poor banglist is being pummeled to pieces these days)


49 posted on 01/14/2013 6:05:15 PM PST by RandallFlagg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

[[Stockman was last in the House in 1997 and was just elected in Nov. 2012 for the first time since then.

How quick you are to falsely criticize one of our only patriots in the House.]]

[[You don’t know what you are talking about. ]]

You are correct- I didn’t realize that- and I was judgign his comments by all the other gop-ers who ‘boldly proclaimed’ that they would ‘do whatever it takes to stop the rogue pres but per usual, in the end, they caved in like they ALWAYS do- I simply assumed he was another politician who has been in for awhile and if so it was obvious that he didn’t acti n the past to stop unconstitutional acts agaisnt us- I was mistaken notr knowing he was recently elected— but I still have my doubts as I’ve heard it all before and have watched on politician after another buckle when washington threatened to withhold federal funding- The only one I’ve really seen stand up to ovama has been that sherrif Araipo, and Jan Brewer of Az. Perhaps htere have been others, but if so they don’t get much press- and i’m not aware of htem-


50 posted on 01/14/2013 6:39:31 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson