Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bunkerhill7

” He also said NY has to “strike back””


AGREED! We have to strike back at someone who just violated “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” but he knows damned well nothing will happen.

Hell, all the chest thumping and those few of us who still believe in the brilliance of the founders have not even drawn ANY line in the sand so why should these charlatans fear us?

What or where is the line in the sand? We have already allowed them to violate “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”

We have thousands of sluts who demand we pay for their abortions which the Constitution is silent yet the same human debris feels free to INFRINGE on something the Constitution states unequivocally “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”

So no, because a “do not cross” line has not been defined there will be no action and cannot be any action and the damned politicians know it and are laughing at us.


20 posted on 01/15/2013 2:32:23 PM PST by Wurlitzer (Nothing says "ignorance" like Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wurlitzer
What or where is the line in the sand?

Heller and McDonald.

This is no longer a 2A issue. It is now a Civil Rights issue and NY is now in violation of Federal Civil Rights Protection acts.

A smart attorney could file an injunction and demand that the Courts and the Federal Government intervene and place NY under interdict where they can't do anything with regard to 2A issues without first clearing it with DOJ.

Wouldn't that be a hoot? Getting jackboots onto the necks of the jackboots.

46 posted on 01/15/2013 3:51:44 PM PST by superloser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson