Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top Climate Official: Don't be Confused by Flat-lining Temperatures, Warming is Worse
Daily Tech ^ | January 16, 2013 5:22 PM | Jason Mick (Blog)

Posted on 01/17/2013 12:07:52 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

James Hansen puts an interesting spin on reports of the ninth warmest year on record

2012 was a kind of glass-half full, glass half-empty year in terms of global temperature.  

I. Climate Chief: Don't Worry, We're Still Doomed

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) in-depth analysis of satellite and other forms of climate data ruled the year was the ninth warmest on record.  The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) independent analysis of ground and sea-based climate stations reported that the year was the tenth warmest on record.

The NASA report states that the average global temperature was 58.3 degrees Fahrenheit (14.6 Celsius), which is 1.0 F (0.6 C) warmer than the mid-20th century baseline, or 1.4 F (0.6 C) warmer than the earliest comprehensive observations from the 1880s.

Still, the year marks the fifth year of a relative flatline in global temperatures after a decade in which the record was regularly broken.

Global warming proponents like James Hansen, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, blame this deviation from their "doomsday" calculations on a specialized cooling phenomenon called "La Nina", which lowers temperatures in the Eastern Pacific.


Surface temperatures
Despite flat-lining surface temperatures over the last five years, some climate researchers insist we're headed to doomsday warming and should keep our fingers on the panic button.
[Image Source: GISS]

The climate official claims that aerosols, which reflect solar radiation, also had a cooling affect on temperatures.

Mr. Hansen argues that the public shouldn't just look at the numbers, but look at more nebulous and abstract observations, which he sees as supporting his beliefs of runaway warming.  He writes, "The observant person who is willing to look at the past over several seasons and several years, should notice that the frequency of unusual warm anomalies has increased and the extreme anomalies."

He and other global warming advocates have pointed to the summer's drought in central North America and high temperatures in the Rocky Mountains as such "extreme anomalies".  

II. A Hot Year for the U.S., Arctic, but a Cool One Elsewhere

2012, according to a separate NOAA report, was the hottest year on record for the U.S. The year did mark a new low for summer Arctic sea ice, according to NASA.  However, that could bring some benefits for mankind, such as opening up oil resources.

NOAA map
Parts of the globe cooled, others warmed in 2012. [Image Source: NOAA]

And temperatures for the year were actually cooler than average in several regions -- Alaska, far western Canada, central Asia, parts of the eastern and equatorial Pacific and parts of the Southern Ocean.

California meteorologist Anthony Watts, a known critic of doomsday predictions from folks like James Hansen, casts the U.S.'s record year in a different light, commenting, "If anything, U.S. temperatures are warming at a slower rate in recent decades compared to the early warming period, even with all of that lovely warm weather last year."

He points out that the recent increase (1980-2012) in U.S. surface temperatures was dwarfed by a sharp rise between 1919-1934, which was followed by a period of cooling.

In a follow-up piece, he argues the overall flatline may indicate that natural forces (including in a cooling direction) have a greater impact on global temperatures than human ones, based on his independent analysis over the last half decade.

Sources: NASA, NOAA, Jame Hansen [note]


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: climatechange; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; jameshansen

1 posted on 01/17/2013 12:08:00 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain."
2 posted on 01/17/2013 12:09:05 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (TYRANNY: When the people fear the politicians. LIBERTY: When the politicians fear the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; Marine_Uncle; Fred Nerks; Carry_Okie; blam; Lorianne; Twotone; bigbob; NormsRevenge; ...

fyi


3 posted on 01/17/2013 12:11:32 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ((The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Just a NASA attempt to get more funding to do whatever they do...help muslims be proud of their science from 1000 years ago or just fart around to see how man made methane affects the climate!


4 posted on 01/17/2013 12:13:30 PM PST by texson66 (Obummer: American Patriots' Worst Nightmare and Enemy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Sorry. “It’s warming because I say it is” doesn’t feed the bulldog with me.


5 posted on 01/17/2013 12:15:42 PM PST by Colonel_Flagg ("Don't be afraid to see what you see." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
From Anthony Watts website....WUWT:

Quote of the week – Hansen concedes the age of flatness

*******************************************************

Quote of the week – Hansen concedes the age of flatness

Posted on by

qotw_cropped

Dr. James Hansen and Reto Ruedy of NASA GISS have written a paper (non peer reviewed) with a remarkable admission in it. It is titled Global Temperature Update Through 2012.

Here is the money quote, which pretty much ends the caterwauling from naysayers about global temperature being stalled for the last decade.

The five-year mean global temperature has been flat for the last decade, which we interpret as a combination of natural variability and a slow down in the growth rate of net climate forcing.

Gosh, I thought Hansen had claimed that “climate forcings” had overwhelmed natural variability?

In 2003 Hansen wrote a widely distributed (but not peer reviewed) paper called Can We Defuse the Global Warming Time Bomb? in which he argues that human-caused forcings on the climate are now greater than the natural ones, and that this, over a long time period, can cause large climate changes.

As we shall see, the small forces that drove millennial climate changes are now overwhelmed by human forcings.

According to Hansen’s latest essay, apparently not. So much for “da bomb”.

Here are some other interesting excerpts from his recent essay, Bob Tisdale take note:

An update through 2012 of our global analysis reveals 2012 as having practically the same temperature as 2011, significantly lower than the maximum reached in 2010. These short-term global fluctuations are associated principally with natural oscillations of tropical Pacific sea surface temperatures summarized in the Nino index in the lower part of the figure. 2012 is nominally the 9th warmest year, but it is indistinguishable in rank with several other years, as shown by the error estimate for comparing nearby years. Note that the 10 warmest years in the record all occurred since 1998.

The current stand-still of the 5-year running mean global temperature may be largely a consequence of the facr [sic] that the first half of the past 10 years had predominantly El Nino conditions, and the second half had predominantly La Nina conditions.

The approximate stand-still of global temperature during 1940-1975 is generally attributed to an approximate balance of aerosol cooling and greenhouse gas warming during a period of rapid growth of fossil fuel use with little control on particulate air pollution, but quantitative interpretation has been impossible because of the absence of adequate aerosol measurements.

That last part about 1940-1975 is telling, given that we now have a cleaner atmosphere, and less aerosols to reflect sunlight, it goes without saying that more sunlight now reaches the surface. Since GISS is all about the surface temperature, that suggests (to rational thinkers at least) that some portion of the surface temperature rise post 1975 is due to pollution controls being enacted.

But, he’s still arguing for an imbalance, even though flatness abounds. Seems like equilibrium to me…

Climate change expectations.

The continuing planetary imbalance and the rapid increase of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel  assure that global warming will continue on decadal time scales.  Moreover, our interpretation of the larger role of unforced variability in temperature change of the past decade suggests that global temperature will rise significantly in the next few years as the tropics moves inevitably to the next El Nino phase.

Except when natural forcings overwhelm the human component of course.

6 posted on 01/17/2013 12:17:45 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ((The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

E. Pluribus Unum ~: “Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.”

Too True !
Nobody in Gobbernment would tamper with the evidence !
That is why Lubchenco is leaving NOAA - “agenda 21” impostion in fisheries, not submitting travel expense documents, etc...
That is why Goofey is leaving EPA ~ “ agenda 21” , killing coal fuels , illegal email correspondence
It seems that a lot of people , like Panetta and others suddenly feel “the need to spend more time with their families.”
I call it B.S. !!
Yeah , I trust what Goobberment sources tell me ... not !


7 posted on 01/17/2013 12:19:30 PM PST by Tilted Irish Kilt (Pay attention - the inmates ARE running the asylum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Humanity has suffered and starved when it’s cold, when it’s warm we get grapes in England, Greenland has a lot of Green, growing seasons everywhere expand.
Humanity flourishes in the warm times.


8 posted on 01/17/2013 12:19:45 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

So 2012 was unusually warm for North America. Will 2013 be Australia’s turn?

Who knows?

We can’t control it and if we could, shouldn’t. That would be the all time high for.....

Hubris


9 posted on 01/17/2013 12:20:02 PM PST by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

And the happiest part of global warming, is when the sunflowers come out. A sunflower of course being a smoking hot Russian woman who has been through another long bitter gray sky winter,,and can’t wait to get out and rock her miniskirt and heels.

And their warm season is much too short. Short as their summer skirts.
Yeahhhhh,,,


10 posted on 01/17/2013 12:25:14 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Warming can be uncomfortable. Cold just plain hurts.


11 posted on 01/17/2013 12:26:37 PM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The blatant BS of these global warming nuts is mind-boggling. No matter what the weather does -warm, cold, in-between, it is interpreted by them as proof that they are right. A scientific theory that is supported by the data, no matter what happens, is no theory at all. Just a political philosophy being peddled as “science”. I read a quote from one of the environut leaders about a year ago admitting that even is fossil fuels weren’t causing the climate to change, they would still want the same curbs and prohibitions on the use of fossil fuels. The global climate change propaganda just gives them something to rally around to achieve their goals.


12 posted on 01/17/2013 12:27:07 PM PST by Avid Coug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

“the earliest comprehensive observations from the 1880s.”

So,,,, on the vast beach, that comprises The Sands Of Time, we’re judging this BS by looking at 132 grains of sand?


13 posted on 01/17/2013 12:30:15 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avid Coug

So... the fact that the temperature is not rising is proof that it is.

OK....got it.


14 posted on 01/17/2013 12:31:56 PM PST by Wordkraft (Remember who the Collaborators are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; a fool in paradise; Slings and Arrows

Don’t be confused, I’ve got a family to support and a mortrgage to pay!


15 posted on 01/17/2013 12:34:10 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Okay. Ignore the data, just listen to us.
Wait a year and temperatures will either go up or down, confirming either Global Warming or Climate Change.
/sarc


16 posted on 01/17/2013 12:35:21 PM PST by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

This is the same James Hansen who, exactly four years ago (Jan. 17, 2009, in “The Observor”) said that Barack Obama had exactly four years to save the planet.
Four years later, no significant climate rescue from Obama (thankfully—his “rescue” would only have made things worse), but Hansen still sings the same sorry tune.
Hansen’s predictions are as believable as the death of Manti Te’o’s girlfriend.


17 posted on 01/17/2013 12:36:12 PM PST by CivilWarguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Who are you going to believe? This guy or your lying eyes?


18 posted on 01/17/2013 12:44:11 PM PST by King_Corey (www.kingcorey.com -- OpenCarry.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Verily, again and again I shall asked thee. Why is Hansen not sitting in some dingy dark cell in prison.


19 posted on 01/17/2013 12:44:27 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (I'm going John Galt.... But. Honor must be earned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Given that on average, the earth has been in the grips of ice ages, but the climate has also been even warmer for short periods in the distant past, one simple question:

What is the optimum temperature? Who gets to decide and by what metrics?

see, for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vostok_Station

Vostok Station climate record

20 posted on 01/17/2013 12:47:37 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Where does it fall after it’s adjusted?

There is no global warming.


21 posted on 01/17/2013 12:50:13 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I think that we should, according to Obama’s new gun control Executive Orders/Rules, report James Hansen to the mental health authorities for being crazy and a threat to humanity.

Hey Jim. We have a nice new coat for you. No bells or whistles but lots of belts and straps. Here, try it on.


22 posted on 01/17/2013 12:51:35 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Fun BS for later HA HA’s.


23 posted on 01/17/2013 12:53:49 PM PST by Tenacious 1 ("The Brittish are Coming (to confiscate weapons)" - Paul Revere (We know how that ended))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I think that we should, according to Obama’s new gun control Executive Orders/Rules, report James Hansen to the mental health authorities for being crazy and a threat to humanity.

Hey Jim. We have a nice new coat for you. No bells or whistles but lots of belts and straps. Here, try it on.


24 posted on 01/17/2013 12:54:45 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle

He has froends in high places....they want the message to be believed.


25 posted on 01/17/2013 1:08:19 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ((The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
There are a whole bunch of climatologists that needs these coats also.
26 posted on 01/17/2013 1:11:46 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ((The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

All the more reason for him to replace the spook hanging by his wrist on the cell wall, with the bowl of swill filled with say tree bark on the cold dungeon floor.


27 posted on 01/17/2013 1:22:32 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (I'm going John Galt.... But. Honor must be earned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

James Hanson is daft.


28 posted on 01/17/2013 1:33:33 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

Top Climate Scientist. Not anymore.


29 posted on 01/17/2013 1:59:48 PM PST by spawn44 (`MOO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

We’d like some of that “global warming”.....been fogged in at 32-34 degrees for a week now.....wet...cold....much prefer global warming!


30 posted on 01/17/2013 2:17:33 PM PST by goodnesswins (R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avid Coug
Just a political philosophy being peddled as “science”.

Precisely! The only "science" that is involved is "political science".

I just got off a story that was telling the oh so sad tale about the carbon credit market going belly up. My mind has just been boggled about the fact that there was a place where people use real money to trade, essentially, air.

31 posted on 01/17/2013 3:17:07 PM PST by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

I’d like James Hansen to come over to my house every morning and scrape the global warming off my car windows.


32 posted on 01/17/2013 3:18:24 PM PST by ZirconEncrustedTweezers ("I'm not anti-anything, I just wanna be free." - Mike Muir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

My question

Isn’t global warming a good thing. More farmable land. more wild life habitat.

Isn’t an ice age a bad thing? Don’t they wipe out populations?


33 posted on 01/17/2013 3:51:00 PM PST by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
When the crony scientists can not even make it appear as if the planet is warming, there can only be one true possibility.

The temperatures have actually been cooling.

34 posted on 01/17/2013 3:58:34 PM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; ...
DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

35 posted on 01/17/2013 4:03:45 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The NASA report states that the average global temperature was 58.3 degrees Fahrenheit (14.6 Celsius), which is 1.0 F (0.6 C) warmer than the mid-20th century baseline, or 1.4 F (0.6 C) warmer than the earliest comprehensive observations from the 1880s.

Sorry, there's no one on earth who could convince me that temperature records from 1880 could be used to determine the average temperature of the atmosphere to a tenth of a degree. It's just silly. Before the use of satellites, I question that any such measurement could be made or derived from data. I can't believe that otherwise intelligent scientists could persuade themselves that such fairy tales are true.

36 posted on 01/17/2013 4:13:31 PM PST by Rocky (Obama is pure evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson