Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/22/2013 8:54:48 AM PST by jstaff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jstaff

Never heard that one.


2 posted on 01/22/2013 9:11:28 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (There is no requirement to show need in order to exercise your rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jstaff

The same argument would apply to 18” vs 16” vs 15” barrels.


3 posted on 01/22/2013 9:15:00 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jstaff
Early on in the NYS BULLET GRAB explanantion, I heard as long as you only had 7 slots in use, a 10, 20 round whatever they're called, is legal.

Can you tell I pretty much know zip about clips etc??

4 posted on 01/22/2013 9:29:27 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jstaff
The DC Circuit, when it decided Heller II, held the opposite.

Heller v. District of Columbia, No. 10-7036 (2011)

We hold the District had the authority under D.C. law to promulgate the challenged gun laws, and we uphold as constitutional the prohibitions of assault weapons and of large-capacity magazines (>10) and some of the registration requirements. ...

Heller suggests "M-16 rifles and the like" may be banned because they are "dangerous and unusual," see 554 U.S. at 627. The Court had previously described the "AR-15" as "the civilian version of the military's M-16 rifle." Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600, 603 (1994). Although semi- automatic firearms, unlike automatic M-16s, fire "only one shot with each pull of the trigger," id. at 602 n.1, semi-automatics still fire almost as rapidly as automatics.

If you are looking to find the federal courts consistent when it comes to the RKBA, the only consistency you will find is that they are intellectually dishonest, and they do not abide by precedent that does not suit their predetermined agenda.

There is plenty to "not like" in the DC Circuit opinion. I haven't heard of a petition to SCOTUS hearing the case, but assume one was filed, and the petition was denied. IOW, what the DC ciruit said in 2011 is the law.

Not that I have any resepect for the law, but it is what it is.

5 posted on 01/22/2013 9:45:53 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jstaff

A clip or magazine is only a storage device, and should not be regulated at all, in my opinion. At least not by the federal government.

I can “feed” cartridges into my firearm by hand — so am I only allowed to hold 7 rounds in my hand at one time?


6 posted on 01/22/2013 10:34:25 AM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jstaff
152 F.3d 522

PEOPLES RIGHTS ORGANIZATION, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF COLUMBUS, et al., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

Nos. 96-3468, 96-3495.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Argued June 3, 1997.
Decided July 15, 1998.

13 posted on 01/22/2013 5:42:05 PM PST by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson