Of course, this article is presuming that the Democratic machine hasn’t taken over counting the votes and are allowing relatively free elections.
The WSJ has, ALWAYS, been in the position of “pro-amnesty for illegal immigrants, for cheap labor purposes and despite all of the negative consequences of having endless rounds of amnesty for illegal immigrants happening throughout the entire U.S. and throughout all U.S. territories”, so their “spin” on the issues must be seen from the “angle” that amnesty for illegal immigrants MUST HAPPEN, as soon as possible and for always.