Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NPR finally gets it does this signal an end to the polar bear as poster bear for global warming?
Watts Up With That? ^ | February 4, 2013 | Anthony Watts

Posted on 02/04/2013 10:46:37 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Image from Tundrabuggy.com - comedy added by WUWT

Image from Tundrabuggy.com – comedy added by WUWT

From NPR: The Inconvenient Truth About Polar Bears

In 2008, reports of polar bears’ inevitable march toward extinction gripped headlines. Stories of thinning Arctic ice and even polar bear cannibalism combined to make these predators into a powerful symbol in the debate about climate change.

The headlines caught Zac Unger’s attention, and he decided to write a book about the bears.

Unger made a plan to move to Churchill, Manitoba, a flat, gray place on the Hudson Bay in northern Canada accessible only by train or plane. For a few months out of the year, as the bay starts to freeze, tiny Churchill boasts as many polar bears as it does people.

Unger packed up his wife and three small kids, and set out with a big bold idea. He wanted to write the quintessential requiem of how human-caused climate change was killing off these magnificent beasts.

In the end, he came away with something totally different, Unger tells NPR’s Laura Sullivan. 

Interview Highlights

On wanting to write the next great environmental tract

“My humble plan was to become a hero of the environmental movement. I was going to go up to the Canadian Arctic, I was going to write this mournful elegy for the polar bears, at which point I’d be hailed as the next coming of John Muir and borne aloft on the shoulders of my environmental compatriots …

“So when I got up there, I started realizing polar bears were not in as bad a shape as the conventional wisdom had led me to believe, which was actually very heartening, but didn’t fit well with the book I’d been planning to write.

“… There are far more polar bears alive today than there were 40 years ago. … In 1973, there was a global hunting ban. So once hunting was dramatically reduced, the population exploded. This is not to say that global warming is not real or is not a problem for the polar bears. But polar bear populations are large, and the truth is that we can’t look at it as a monolithic population that is all going one way or another.”

On moving his family to “Polar Bear Capital of the World”

“We were in this town in northern Manitoba where polar bears literally will walk down Main Street. There are polar bears in this town. People will leave their cars and houses unlocked, and it’s perfectly good form just to duck into any open door you can find when there’s a polar bear chasing you.

“People use what they call Churchill welcome mats, which is a piece of plywood laid down in front of the door or leaned up against the door with hundreds of nails sticking out so that when the polar bear comes up to pad across your porch, he’s going to get a paw full of sharp nails.”

Zac Unger has worked as a firefighter and paramedic for the Oakland Fire Department. He is also the author of Working Fire: The Making of a Fireman.

Courtesy De Capo Press

On Churchill’s strategies for living among bears

“There are definitely polar bears that come into town; there are definitely polar bears that will eat people’s dogs. But Churchill has developed an innovative polar bear alert program. The way it works is you dial a phone number — 675-BEAR — if you see a bear, and a bunch of wildlife conservation officers will come by in a truck with a bunch of guns. And they try really hard not to harm the bears, and they kind of scare the bears out of town. They have a progression that they use: First, they will fire firecracker shells; then they move up to rubber bullets; and as a last resort, they’ll move up to real bullets.

“They don’t want to do that. These are conservation officers so their job is to keep bears safe. Churchill also has a polar bear jail. These are for bears who keep coming into town and can’t be hazed out of town. And what they’ll do is they will trap these bears and put them in the polar bear jail, which is just a great big decommissioned military building. And they will give them no food, and they’re given only snow to drink and then they wait until the bay freezes up. And when the bay freezes up, these bears can be released to go back out on the ice.

“[The bears] don’t want to be in town, they’re just waiting for the ice to freeze. But if they’re a hassle in town, put them in jail, give them a short sentence, and the problem is solved.”

On trick-or-treating when polar bears might be lurking around the corner

“Halloween is when you’re supposed to go up with lots of food and run around with your kids. So we were up there for Halloween … and so what they do is when you go out trick-or-treating you go out with somebody who has a gun — whether it’s a police officer, or a volunteer or someone from the military. They all come out and they help you go trick-or-treating. Now, they have one rule, which is that kids can’t dress in anything white — no princesses, no ghosts — because you don’t want to be dressed as something white in the darkness when there’s a bunch of guys with guns looking for polar bears.”

==============================================================

Maybe now we’ll see far less use of this photoshopped image, dubbed Ursus Bogus:

image

==============================================================

In related news: Is polar bear scientist Monnett still under investigation?

Polar bear scientist Charles Monnett’s long-running entanglement with bureaucratic investigations into the quality and ethics of his work may not be over, despite a finding by his government employer in September that he could return to work. At the time, Monnett was delivered the equivalent of a slap on the hand — a written reprimand for sharing work emails with environmentalists.

He was cleared of more damning allegations that his science was bad, his motives questionable. Yet according to attorney Jeff Ruch, who has represented Monnett throughout the investigation, the Office of the Inspector General has confirmed the case remains open. Agents with the Inspector General’s office conducted the inquiry into Monnett’s work and last fall returned their analysis to the Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management (BOEM), Monnett’s employer. The bureau determined there could be evidence of criminal wrongdoing and scientific misconduct, but left it to BOEM to decide how to interpret the Inspector General’s findings and what, if anything, to do about it.

Intense scrutiny of Monnett at the hands of government investigators quickly became an ongoing saga with political implications. When the investigation began, Monnett worked for the Minerals Management Service, an agency that not only conducted research into marine mammals, but which also permitted oil and gas exploration in Arctic waters. Tensions were growing among scientists who felt their observations were being swept under the rug to ease the permitting process.

Polar bears: powerful symbol

Meanwhile, the prospect of drowning polar bears became a powerful symbol. Monnett and a co-author, Dr. Jeffrey Gleason, made brief reference to drowned bears in a 2006 journal article. During a 2004 overflight to survey bowhead whales in Alaska’s arctic. Monnett and his colleagues witnessed what they believed were four dead bears floating in the Arctic Ocean. It was the first published documentation of dead bears at sea, and Monnett and Dr. Jeffrey Gleason surmised that the number of dead bears would increase as sea ice melted. At some point during the investigation, Monnett’s methods for documenting the deaths and putting them into context became a target of the inquiry. Investigators, who were vague during much of the process, would only say scientific misconduct, and perhaps miscalculations, were one aspect of concern regarding the scientist’s work.

==============================================================

And that is all it took for Al Jazeera Gore to run with it in An Inconvenient Truth:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whWvXkK0HJ8


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Pets/Animals; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: artic; climatechange; defundpbsnpr; globalwarmingscare; globlwarminghoax; polarbears; pravdamedia; waronerror

1 posted on 02/04/2013 10:46:43 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I’ve been a long time advocate of Man Made Global Warming Activists moving to the north pole and keeping polar bears as pets. This way, they could take care of the bears and save their existence, while at the same time, giving their home nations a similar chance of survival by becoming extinct themselves.


2 posted on 02/04/2013 11:05:13 AM PST by Tenacious 1 ("The British are Coming (to confiscate weapons)" - Paul Revere (We know how that ended))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

A polar bear can swim up to 100 miles.


3 posted on 02/04/2013 11:05:17 AM PST by Foolsgold (L I B Lacking in Brains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

I like the plan.


4 posted on 02/04/2013 11:07:14 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ((The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Foolsgold
A polar bear can swim up to 100 miles.

Not on a full belly. They get cramps and drown. (liberal logic response)

5 posted on 02/04/2013 11:07:36 AM PST by Tenacious 1 ("The British are Coming (to confiscate weapons)" - Paul Revere (We know how that ended))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

6 posted on 02/04/2013 11:11:22 AM PST by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Polar bears SUCK. Love hunt and eat people. They live just fine with less or more ice. Makes no difference to them. Less or more seals makes a difference, but ice? they don't eat ice, and the entire planet is ice at the poles in the winter.

Polar bears are a living inconvenient truth to the envirowackos. But then, reality is that way for them often.

7 posted on 02/04/2013 11:12:45 AM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

“People will leave their cars and houses unlocked, and it’s perfectly good form just to duck into any open door you can find when there’s a polar bear chasing you.”

...and if the bear gets there first?


8 posted on 02/04/2013 11:49:25 AM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I listen to NPR often on my commute. They are like high school seniors trying to sound all adult and stuff. I often find myself laghing out loud at their stories and the way they report them. Occasionally there is something worthwile on as well, just not very often.


9 posted on 02/04/2013 11:51:21 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I keep thinking about what the environmental wackos would do if the sabre-tooth tiger were still around today and their numbers were dwindling.

Would they tell us that the balance of life on earth would never be the same again if the sabre-tooth disappeared?

Yet, here we are, many thousands of years later, after the sabre-tooth became extinct, and, life has gone on, and nobody can outline what damage, if any, was caused by the extintion.


10 posted on 02/04/2013 11:54:23 AM PST by adorno (Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Being a global alarmist is a good racket. For eleven months out of the year, you go to cocktail parties and show PowerPoint presentations about animals and exotic locations. Then, for one month, you go to some exotic location and take photos. Take your girlfriend, or boyfriend, along and write your vacation off as a business expense. It’s a great racket.


11 posted on 02/04/2013 11:55:42 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

All this talk about the right to bear arms has got them nervous......


12 posted on 02/04/2013 12:04:33 PM PST by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baddog 219
Photobucket
13 posted on 02/04/2013 12:05:30 PM PST by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Well, at least on the polar bear question, the reporter was an honest liberal. He changed his thesis to match the facts. That should be acknowledged.


14 posted on 02/04/2013 1:03:45 PM PST by Dr. Sivana ("C'est la vie" say the old folks, it goes to show you never can tell. -- Chuck Berry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Polar bears are brown bears who roamed north thousands of years ago looking for food and adapted to the colder weather. Despite that fact, the warmists believe polar bears would be unable to adapt to warmer weather.


15 posted on 02/04/2013 3:18:14 PM PST by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

16 posted on 02/04/2013 6:23:10 PM PST by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baddog 219

Issue that Bear an NRA membership......LOL!


17 posted on 02/04/2013 6:26:11 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ((The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
They are like high school seniors trying to sound all adult and stuff.

For a bunch of socialist egalitarians, they are insufferably snooty.

It's the opposite of "evil rich" conservative talk radio.

18 posted on 02/04/2013 6:31:01 PM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

BTTT!


19 posted on 02/07/2013 7:41:33 PM PST by neverdem ( Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

>> “and if the bear gets there first” <<

.
If the bear gets there first, then he isn’t chasing you, you are chasing him.


20 posted on 02/07/2013 9:12:56 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Perdogg; Kevmo; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; ...

Thanks Ernest.

As OPEC budget surpluses start to dry up, the cash currently used to buy off US politicians in and out of gov’t will flow, increasingly, toward places like, oh, Tunisia, Syria, Egypt, Lebanon, Mali — any Islamofascist hell-hole currently in panic mode but which lacks significant oil revenue.

This is actually part of the plan of Zero et al — because, after all, there can be only one The One. Bringing and keeping US politicians under his control will be his lifelong project, including after he leaves office. Making politicians beholden to a domestic dictator through taxpayer and debt-funded largesse, rather than foreign despots, is a must-win battle for him, and he will win it.

Venezuela’s recent devaluation of its currency is not dissimilar to China’s long six-abreast march into the sea, because it has been done for the same reason, namely, to keep the US buying from them while suppressing both imports and (in the case of Venezuela) buying power. With or without Chavez, his regime will endure for now.

A year from now the supply of crude will continue to be artificially constrained by OPEC to maintain the price per bbl, but the cartel will be bleeding unauthorized oil to try to take advantage of the temporary price bubble. Iran will be the main beneficiary of this practice of black marketeering.

The House of Saud remains dominant in OPEC, and as it tries horizontal integration among OPEC members, it needs to maintain high crude prices. Victory in Syria over its archrival Iran would set the stage for the next act — defeat of the Iranian proxies in, and partition of, Iraq. Despite its own production decline, Russia also benefits from continued high prices on crude, and that has more than a little to do with Russia’s continued support of Assad. Once Assad goes, and the Saudis defeat Iran in Lebanon, Iran’s finances will have to be cratered, and to do that, the Saudis will merely turn on the oil spigot.


21 posted on 02/09/2013 7:55:15 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson