Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

England to mandate dog microchips by 2016
Engadget ^ | Feb 7th, 2013 at 2:30 AM | Zach Honig

Posted on 02/07/2013 4:13:27 AM PST by glorgau

Thinking about injecting an identification chip in your pooch? If you live in the southern part of the UK, you won't have a choice. Come 2016, English authorities will require all of the country's pups to have embedded microchips, so they can be returned to their owners if ever they run astray. The United Kingdom's Environment Department says some 60 percent of the country's 8 million dogs already have the tags, but beginning in three years, owners who don't spring for the device could be forced to pay fines of up to £500 (about $780). Cat microchipping will remain optional, since felines are less likely to wander outdoors. And "World's Cutest Dog" fans need not worry about their precious Boo getting the forced implant -- the famed Pomeranian (pictured above) is based in San Francisco, some 5,000 miles from the Queen's needle.


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Conspiracy; Humor
KEYWORDS: 666
This is end times - The mark of the Beast! ;-)
1 posted on 02/07/2013 4:13:30 AM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: glorgau

... or the electronic marking of the beast . . .


2 posted on 02/07/2013 4:21:05 AM PST by Chad N. Freud (FR is the modern equivalent of the Committees of Correspondence. Let other analogies arise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

That Kafka-esque country is totally out of control.

(Or totally *under* control. Your perspective depends on whether you are inside the government or outside of it.)

They keep pulling stuff that the Soviet Union would have chuckled at.


3 posted on 02/07/2013 4:23:40 AM PST by Chad N. Freud (FR is the modern equivalent of the Committees of Correspondence. Let other analogies arise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

Watch out! I heard that Obama also likes dogs with chips!


4 posted on 02/07/2013 4:24:30 AM PST by Chad N. Freud (FR is the modern equivalent of the Committees of Correspondence. Let other analogies arise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau
I thought this

was the mark of the beast

5 posted on 02/07/2013 4:26:19 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

England is a country that certainly loves its domesticated creatures. And their pets.


6 posted on 02/07/2013 4:27:17 AM PST by Chad N. Freud (FR is the modern equivalent of the Committees of Correspondence. Let other analogies arise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

First the dogs, then...


7 posted on 02/07/2013 4:29:15 AM PST by ComputerGuy (HM2/USN M/3/3 Marines RVN 66-67)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

As the owner of a puppy, I am considering a microchip. We already have a wireless GPS tracker.

My dog is prone to taking off to play and I have 80 acres bordered by 2 roads. We also have coyotes who already track him when we are on walks and we have wolves and bears. So my reasons for the GPS system are to limit our searches to probable locations in the event he runs off, which has already happened a couple of times when he has bitten thru his leash and gone into *play* mode and will not come near us until he is tired and hungry. My husband spent an hour in the wrong place looking for him while I discovered him tailing me in another area while I looked for him. Enough of that!

Now, if he gets loose and is found by someone, he is so friendly, they will just want to keep him. I need an identifier that can’t be removed. So, I am ok w/chipping dogs. I love mine and while he is a dog person, he is not a human person. There is a distinction.


8 posted on 02/07/2013 8:07:03 AM PST by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal

I am all for ‘chipping dogs’ too. I think it’s a great thing. I approve.

I am against mandating it.

I am for man’s best friend; I am against mandates’ best friends.


9 posted on 02/07/2013 12:42:54 PM PST by Chad N. Freud (FR is the modern equivalent of the Committees of Correspondence. Let other analogies arise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chad N. Freud

Agreed.


10 posted on 02/07/2013 12:51:11 PM PST by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson