I think he meant the hero sniper was not a “good guy.” I got it and it ain’t good.
Not how I read it. I think he is saying that the hero sniper was a good guy, but a good guy with a gun wasn't enough to stop the bad guy with a gun.
I think he meant the hero sniper was not a “good guy.” I got it and it ain’t good.
More likely he was being snarky and taking a shot at Wayne LaPierre’s statement that good guys with guns are the solution to bad guys with guns. In the retarded mind of a liberal anytime a good guy with a gun fails to prevent a bad guy with a gun, that’s proof positive that the premise can NEVER be true. They excel at the logical fallacy of reductio ad absurdum, like young children, when they argue everything is an absolute and an extreme.
Having lived in the KC area for 7 years not too long ago, I can say with certainty that Lee Judge is a complete douche and serves as a poster child for what libtards look like and act like. But even douches have a 1A right to proclaim to all what a douche they really are.