Skip to comments.Company selling targets with images of Americans to DHS for firearms training
Posted on 02/21/2013 10:12:36 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
click here to read article
I took a look at their site. No targets depicting any non-whites, as far as I could find.
That’s by my house. Bachmann’s district.
Not really MPLS, more like Lino Lakes.
I first saw an article about them yesterday. I thereupon went to their site, and saw all those targets there. They were in the “scenario targets” category:
They have since been taken down, but I saw them there yesterday.
The “Wayback Machine” internet archives site also has the targets in question. Look quickly before they get scrubbed, because Wayback complies with site owner requests to take stuff down.
Yes, he did, and that helps.
“shoot/don’t shoot” targets have been around forever.
“no hesitation” could be also mean just being able to make a decision quickly. (kinda important to be able to do in some situations) not sure this is the big deal some are making it to be.
now if they all had Tea Party shirts or “Palin 2016” on or were waving Gadsen flags...I’d be worried.
I wonder if LAPD asks for ones that look like newspaper gals?
Or if they have any SWAT ones featuring black labs?
NO HESITATION! BLOW HIM AWAY!
Until now, they were "don't shoot the toddler."
Ping to posts 104 and 105. They are real, and I saw them myself on their site yesterday before they took them down.
Got it, thanks ‘Bear.
surprised the dhs hasnt partnered up with DOD warplaners and had some printed that actually say ‘tea party’ on em...
THAT’s a “target” to be used at the gun range & DHS and HHS? YIKES! “Center Mass” takes on multiple meanings, there, doesn’t it?
< /major sarcasm>
An original page for No More Hesitation targets still on the Law Enforcement Targets website (found with the Bing search engine) ...
Already scrubbed, now the hyperventilating boot lickers who saw it yesterday can deny it ever existed.
It's rather interesting that you assume he doesn't know that.
They probably already have them.
Alaska Wolf ~ That's understandable. I'm sure the facility doesn't need the SS shutting them down.
He shoots, he scores, the crowd goes wild!!!
These days, no old pages can truly be “disappeared.” There are many “wayback machine” apps to find them.
It only indicates shame and guilt when a company or agency tries to hide something like these “shoot the todder without hesitation!” targets.
The “scrubbed” web pages can be pulled out of the ether at will.
Coincidentally, those are the “25 million that will have to be killed because they can’t be re-educated”.
These communists intend to use the government to murder all opposition.
Can we get targets with “Blue Helmented” soldiers and black-uniformed thugs?
By the agencies? No, our "betters" feel no need to apologize, ever.
The company did, and further identified agency requests as the genesis of the idea in the first place.
See, for example, post #88.
We got a screen capture over on the other thread at Reply #51
Good thing tattoos are growing in popularity...
Old Sarge, you are indeed an old guy like me, in that you still expect the art of proofreading to be applied today. My wife and I roll our eyes several times a day at glaring mispellings and typos both on the internet and in printed material. We see them in veterans’ group newsletters, magazines, and company websites. Kids today just don’t learn how to spell, or care, and nobody checks. It’s amazing. We even have seen them on brochures and websites from “brand name” universities trying to recruit our high school senior daughter! So no, they don’t surprise me one bit. Nobody cares. Nobody checks. Nobody gives a damn...but us old relics of a bygone day.
If they wanted more realistic targets, they would create them depicting women in aprons clutching a toddler slumped on the floor in their kitchen with a look of terror on her face.
“Already scrubbed, now the hyperventilating boot lickers who saw it yesterday can deny it ever existed.”
I already grabbed it and emailed it to a few people. It didn’t go anywhere.
This is a video I helped to make, it has had 11,000 views in 2 days.
"one officer explaining that he enlarged photos of his own kids to use as targets so that he would not be caught off guard...."
Note to mom... Hide the kids, get a restraining order, be armed yourself for when the day comes....
Who wouldn't pick up a gun if they had one handy, in the last second of their life?
"Whoops, sorry, somebody entered the wrong digit into our GPS."
Or imagine the DHS dad who volunteered his own son for the “toddler in the park” target.
Sick, sick stuff.
It’s always fun and games to be the tough guy in a one-way shooting gallery, but they are seriously outgunned if it ever becomes two-way.
Yeah, Boss, you and I are of that same breed. I don’t tolerate it in my own writing, and check myself constantly. Part of the problem is, MS Word has made too many lazy people. Autocorrect is NOT your friend.
I’m not nearly as published as YOU are, but we both take pride in our works. Our writing is a reflection of ourselves.
But then, sometimes insisting on propur speling and gramer is a loosing battle...
In the first edition of EFAD, somehow I autocorrected airplane hangars to hangers, in about ten place at once.
Spellcheck was very content, and I missed it. OOOPS!
Look at what ONE deranged shooter did to LE in California for a week. Dorner had them on unsustainable 12/12 shifts until they were worn out in nothing flat.
Yes, which is why the use of "law enforcement" armed drones on U.S. soil will occur with regularity in the very near future.
My spellcheck has actually done eroticism on occasion.
Shows you where ITS mind goes...
Indeed they will. And also put up aerostat balloons with “Gorgon Stare” hyper-cameras over each city.
Maybe someone should market targets with certain politicians’ pictures on them. I mean, turnaround’s fair play. First amendment and all that.
The funniest autocorrect situation I have heard of was a British paper that deemed “queen” an offensive slur against gays, so in an article in repeatedly wrote, “the Homosexual of England.”
Oh, now THAT’S hilarious!!!
Has it ever been done any other way?
riri ~ Has it ever been done any other way?
Sadly, no. Even more sad is the simple fact that the very people who made the revolution possible are ALWAYS on the hit list.
They have proven that they:
have a traitorous mindset.
are willing to act to overthrow their own government.
have the organizational skills needed for a successful revolution.
have the military skills to wreak havoc.
Still, they are invariably surprised when it is their own back against the pockmarked wall, every single time, every single revolution, without exception.
I didn’t listen to all of Beck, but didn’t hear him mention this. Listening to Rush now and not a peep.
Nothing of FOX news or any other off-line media that I’m aware of.
Are they all oblivious or have they been ordered to give it a good looking away and shuttin’ up?
If anyone sees this appear on “big media” - conservative or otherwise - drop us a link, won’t ya?
I have a feeling that the goombahs are in major damage control / denial mode over it, and very few “normal” American sheeple are going to know this ever happened.
I haven’t checked but assume that all of the major “SNOPES” like sites are trying to debunk it as a hoax as hard as they can in an attempt to head the viral e mails off at the pass.
Has anyone put up a You Tube about it yet? (Maine Prepper has but it’s audio only)
If I see a man wearin' a blue helmet I shoot the man wearin' it!
Give that a shot. ;-)
I had some JBT telling me on Facebook yesterday that he would ABSOLUTELY take that shot, because he was “confident” that he would only hit the woman. (Who looks like a young girl, not a woman, to me)
I’d put the X ring where the 9 is. No point risking that the helmet actually works...
You have yet to provide any. How can one become immune?
I don’t doubt that he would take the shot. Some people on this thread would defend him, even if he did take out the children.
“Nits make lice”...
How many of "you" are there?