Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House and media cry wolf
Wa Po ^ | 2'22 | Jennifer Rubin

Posted on 02/22/2013 10:48:19 PM PST by ExxonPatrolUs

... these terrifying cuts will take us back to the dim dark days of 2009 and still be 10 percent above the domestic discretionary spending levels when President Obama took office... Congress should therefore do one of two things: Give maximum latitude to the Defense Department to direct cuts to items like civilian staff, or do the work for them in an appropriations bill (if we could ever pass a budget) to budget sanely. Better yet it should pass a budget which goes after the real money: entitlements. In Obama terms: We are giving Warren Buffett free Medicare so our troops get substandard, old weapons...

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Chit/Chat

1 posted on 02/22/2013 10:48:27 PM PST by ExxonPatrolUs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

Reducing the Pentagon’s budget has much more impact on national security than the article implies. Let’s reduce the entire budget debate to one small made-up example program. The SMACKU program was awarded to Acme Arms. On this program Acme Arms employees 30 engineers and a 30 other support technicians and production people. Acme has let secondary contracts to subcontractors. Everything is on schedule. The amount of money spent, the burn rate, on the SMACKU is $2 million per month. Now sequestration comes along and the Pentagon instructs Acme Arms to reduce the burn rate to $1.3 million per month and stretch the schedule out.

The impact of this change is far reaching. Some of the subcontractors, who are small and ramped up and maybe invested their own money so they could compete, go out of business. The impact of this is a huge (eventual) cost increase. Also, there may be penalties that Acme has to pay which further increases the impact and robs additional funding from the project.

Meanwhile Acme has informed its employees. Several people retire early. Those people and their expertise and knowledge about SMACKU are no longer available. Some employees get laid off and move to take other jobs elsewhere. Some of the people that Acme had targeted as key players that would not be laid off decided to leave on their own and perhaps start their own business. Almost none of the talent lost will be available when and if the military wants to restart SMACKU. That means that SMACKU restarts almost from scratch.

A program that was on target to deploy fielded hardware in two years may be delayed for five years and end up costing two to six times more due to this funding perturbation. Now, take this scenario and multiply it by almost all of the high tech programs the military has. The impact of sequestration is real for the military and may affect military capabilities for the next 10 years.

2 posted on 02/23/2013 4:58:35 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

So what you’re sayin is the result of sequestration is stimulus spending? Obama is a genius!

3 posted on 02/23/2013 6:44:04 AM PST by ExxonPatrolUs (The Ameritopian Motto: Gov The Sheeple, Buy The Sheeple, Bore The Sheeple)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson