Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AMD Begins to Send Software Developers Next-Generation APUs.
Xbitlabs ^ | 03/04/2013 07:02 PM | Anton Shilov

Posted on 03/05/2013 11:06:56 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Advanced Micro Devices has begun to send its next-generation development systems with new Fusion accelerated processing units to software developers. Some believe that the chipmaker started to prepare developers for the next-generation Jaguar low-power micro-architecture, other think that AMD initiated roll-out of its next-gen Steamroller high-performance architecture among game developers.

Johan Andersson, technical director of Frostbite at EA Digital Illusions CE (EA DICE), a Sweden-based computer game developer that is owned by Electronics Arts, has revealed a photo of a prototype PC board with installed microprocessor and a cooling solution, but without memory and storage. While the developer did not reveal what exactly the board was, he claimed that it was AMD’s “next generation APU” development system.

(Excerpt) Read more at xbitlabs.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: hitech

1 posted on 03/05/2013 11:07:06 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
It is all about getting developers going with HCA...

From the comments to the article picked up a link:

Bolt: GPU acceleration for your C++ application

2 posted on 03/05/2013 11:10:33 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ((The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I’m a bit leery of hardware optimized for C++, there seems to be no really good reason for it* — as a high-level, general-purpose language, C++ is kind of a kludge-fest that doesn’t have any internal vision (i.e. consistency) or anything particularly innovative. Something like the Lisp-machines would of-course benefit from having hardware-optimized for LISP, and it had facilities decades ago that put bleeding-edge GNU/GCC tools [particularly debugging] to shame; the same could be said of the Rational-1000 (Ada); or the Rekursiv/Objektiv CPU architectures which [IIUC] were an experiment to see about optimizing CPUs for OOP.

* — How premature is your optimization when you’re making the HARDWARE cater to the idiosyncrasies of the language? (As opposed to ensuring the HW is correct and then conforming the software [in particular the compiler] to it.)


3 posted on 03/05/2013 11:36:53 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I have learned that the more one removes Windows and Microsoft software from ones computer, the better and more efficiently it runs.


4 posted on 03/05/2013 11:53:11 PM PST by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus sum -- "The Taliban is inside the building")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson