Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman Defends Using Electrical Cord To Discipline Son Caught In Homosexual Act With Cousin
http://dfw.cbslocal.com ^ | 03/16/2013 | Joe Gomez

Posted on 03/16/2013 5:13:26 AM PDT by massmike

Erica Moore of Forest Hill says she was laying in bed one night when she decided to walk-around her house to check on her kids. She found the door to her 15-year-old son’s bedroom shut. When she opened it, she got quite a surprise to see her son wasn’t alone — her teenage male cousin was in the room with him.

“My cousin at the time he was 18. My son he was 15 and I had walked in the room on [my cousin] giving oral sex to my son and I started whooping my son, and I’m the one who got in trouble as a result of me whooping him,” she said. “When I walked in I saw my son, it was just disgusting to me, the way he was looking and my cousin was looking, and my cousin immediately ran out the door. And I’m just like what the?!? You know, is you serious? So that was my reaction because it disgusted me.”

Moore admits that she struck her son with an electrical cord because it’s a form of discipline she was taught, and because she doesn’t believe in homosexuality.

“The police department told me that it was consensual, but they was committing a homosexual act in my house and we are totally against that. So I whooped my son and about three or four months later they came and arrested me for abuse,” she recalled.

(Excerpt) Read more at dfw.cbslocal.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: electricalcord; homoincest; homosexualagenda; incest; pederasty; pedophile

1 posted on 03/16/2013 5:13:27 AM PDT by massmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: massmike

Hell, in the old days, the beating of the son would have been closely followed by the chasing down of the cousin and shooting him. Child molesters should not be tolerated.


2 posted on 03/16/2013 5:16:39 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The ballot box is a sham. Nothing will change until after the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Good for her.


3 posted on 03/16/2013 5:16:58 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

 

4 posted on 03/16/2013 5:26:25 AM PDT by dennisw (too much of a good thing is a bad thing --- Joe Pine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
A fifteen year old is incapable of consenting to sexual relations with an adult under the law. That's why it's known by several other names such as statutory rape or felony child sexual abuse.

This is entirely separate from any presumed child abuse under the law for possibly excessive punishment applied by the mother to her son as a result of the above.

In my opinion, that electrical cord could have been put to much better use in several other ways, but applied to her nephew who is really the worst of the lot, not that any of the three are pure as the driven snow, and the law concurs if the incident transpired as described.

5 posted on 03/16/2013 5:26:49 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

It will in interesting, in a morbid sort of way, to see what happens if the greater media and/or the punditry seize upon this story.

Meaning, I wonder how much the “mom beats son for being gay” theme will be played up, and the “mom catches 18 year old nephew performing an incestuous act on her 15 year old son” element will be muted.


6 posted on 03/16/2013 5:35:46 AM PDT by DemforBush (Bacon: the candy of the meat world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
A fifteen year old is incapable of consenting to sexual relations with an adult under the law.

That's what I was thinking. What happened to 15 will get you 30? Or is that not the law there?

7 posted on 03/16/2013 5:36:32 AM PDT by MAexile (Bats left, votes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MAexile
That's what I was thinking. What happened to 15 will get you 30? Or is that not the law there?

The molester is gay, and some animals are more equal than others.

8 posted on 03/16/2013 5:38:04 AM PDT by Pollster1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: massmike
Moore is currently fighting charges of assault with bodily injury to a family member in Tarrant County, for which she could face prison time.

Now think about this. This was triggered by the trip to the doctor. This type of insanity is going to be much much worse if ObamaCare is implemented. This happened in Texas of all places. If this goes to court, there is no jury that will convict this worman. But remember, this past week about the incident in CA where a wife is admitted to a Psyc Hospital for 2 days and the state comes and takes away both her and her husbands handguns. Triggered by a nurses notes. No trial, no court hearing, no defense, no charges; but 9 armed men from CA AG's office confiscated their guns. Look where we are going.

9 posted on 03/16/2013 5:42:45 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

The molester was 18. Does he qualify as an adult? If so, he is guilty of statutory rape?

In my opinion, probably.


10 posted on 03/16/2013 5:44:23 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MAexile

I’m not aware of a single state with age of consent that low.


11 posted on 03/16/2013 5:48:12 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Bill Clinton proved that oral copulation is not sex. I’m sure the 18 year old will use the defense of the President of the United States as a valid answer. It certainly worked for that idiot.


12 posted on 03/16/2013 5:51:48 AM PDT by juma (What i s the real answer ? Does anyone Know ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry; MAexile
Age of Consent
13 posted on 03/16/2013 6:02:50 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro can't pass E-verify)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: massmike

If the woman’s 18 year old cousin had of been a female it would have been called child molesting.

But since its a queer act its called consensual.


14 posted on 03/16/2013 6:03:49 AM PDT by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

There is an ilk of humans that beats kids with electrical cords and I can tell you it ain’t pretty. This situation is just plain twisted. There is also commonplace incest, more than you could even imagine. It is plain to me she suspected something was amiss because she already had the electrical cord in her hand, so does she typically carry one or what? She could have called the cops or whipped the 18 year old, that would have been more acceptable.


15 posted on 03/16/2013 6:05:34 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Lady your son is being molested and you beat HIM? Wrong person to be beating.


16 posted on 03/16/2013 6:06:07 AM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to thoe tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
“The police department told me that it was consensual,..."

Between an 18-year-old and a 15-year-old?

17 posted on 03/16/2013 6:09:10 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

As pointed out, if 18 yo was male and 15 yo female the ‘We can’t do ANYTHING because it was consensual would NOT have been uttered’...Maybe later, in court, but the desk Sgt or beat cop would never have thought of it.
Mom always walk around - inspecting - the house in middle of night with a handy electric cord?
What does the damage, the cord or lamp/TV/radio or whatever the cord is attached to?
If she would have left the scene and retrieved a weapon, premeditated would have been thought - or at least heavily considered - (Maybe NOT in Texas)
She couldn’t have thought the ‘act’ ALL that disgusting if she didn’t get upset till she saw her son was involved.

Of course, the 18 yo may be the ‘strange uncle/cousin’ that when he comes to visit Dad or another ‘uncle’ may spend a lot of time watching Junior when ‘unk’ around BUT you open the can of whupp ass on the DOER especially if he such activity is his ‘trademark’.

Back in the ‘day’ the Military considered BOTH parties guilty if caught in the act, usually resulting in discharge (groan) and BRIG time for both - the only mitigating circumstance would be one may have been coerced by a Senior, but the local command would push BOTH parties to the next ‘convening authority’.... Local commands ‘job’ was to get both out of area ASAP.


18 posted on 03/16/2013 6:21:21 AM PDT by xrmusn (6/98 --I turn 75 next year- but remember, that's only 24 Celsius. (TKS R. Reagan))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: juma

Yes, I remember his statement.

But because BC said it did not make it law.

He was impeached by the House.

And whether you call it statutory rape or molestation, it is an act of an adult on a minor. That carries a sex offender tag.

I think the cousin is in deep trouble.

The mom will probably never be tried for abuse, because the prosecution knows that the jury will not convict her.


19 posted on 03/16/2013 6:27:03 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: juma

The Clinton Administration was one of the worst things to ever happen in the history of our nation. To forever require young children to read and be taught about his antics in their history classes is a blight on our nation.


20 posted on 03/16/2013 6:36:59 AM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: massmike

And yet. If this was a teacher giving oral sex to this 15 year old, everyone at FR would think it was a big joke and say tbe kid should be happy for getting some action. Where are the posts calling for pictures of the 18 year old to see how “ hot” he is before declaring him guilty?


21 posted on 03/16/2013 6:47:22 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
The police department told me that it was consensual..

I wanna know why we need to keep trusting cops. 18, 15, sounds close to statutory rape to me.

22 posted on 03/16/2013 6:51:12 AM PDT by Clock King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Homosexuals aren’t born.... they’re created....


23 posted on 03/16/2013 6:54:09 AM PDT by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
"Police were alerted after the boy’s grandmother took him to the hospital to treat his injuries."

Ok...now I see the problem.

He had bruises and welts and grandma took him to the hospital???!!!

OH NOOOES HE'S GOT A WELT ON HIS BUTT!!! CALL 911!!!

We are a nation of bed wetters....

Unreal...
24 posted on 03/16/2013 7:31:42 AM PDT by MeOnTheBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks massmike.
My cousin at the time he was 18. My son he was 15 and I had walked in the room on [my cousin] giving oral sex to my son... The police department told me that it was consensual...
The Pedophile Agenda *is* the Homosexual Agenda.


25 posted on 03/16/2013 8:00:28 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: massmike

In gay the activist sponsored social and education events for “teens”, they include boys aged 13-19. The older ones sexually groom the younger ones.


26 posted on 03/16/2013 8:03:50 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

To forever require young children to read and be taught about his antics in their history classes is a blight on our nation.

***
Not to worry. I am sure they will not be taught the truth, at all. Probably their history books just say that Clinton was hounded by the Republicans just because he was a good guy who loved minorities, whom the Pubs just want to harm with their mean tax cuts.


27 posted on 03/16/2013 8:12:22 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Restore us, O God of hosts; let your face shine, that we may be saved! -Ps80)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

28 posted on 03/16/2013 8:15:13 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: massmike

The 18-year-old, (currently old enough to hold a rifle for his country), should have been arrested for stat rape and sodomy.

A time ago, when pussification was not even an idea, the mama’s boy’s friends, would have told the boy all about how they felt, in no uncertain terms or manners, and yes, the 18 y.o. would not have seen too many lights of day, or ‘just done gone skipped off the planet somewhere’.


29 posted on 03/16/2013 8:30:36 AM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

What illiterate wrote this headline?


30 posted on 03/16/2013 8:41:11 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (Better the devil we can destroy than the Judas we must tolerate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

“Good for her.”

What an ass.

You don’t whip people with electrical cords. That is assault.

She is within her rights to discipline her 15 year old but she has no right to do so in a way that is likely to cause injury.


31 posted on 03/16/2013 9:09:36 AM PDT by Nik Naym (It's not my fault... I have compulsive smartass disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: massmike

BOTH of the guys needed to be beaten!! OMG! That poor woman.


32 posted on 03/16/2013 9:24:44 AM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym
Moore admits that she struck her son with an electrical cord because it’s a form of discipline she was taught, and because she doesn’t believe in homosexuality.

You don’t whip people with electrical cords. That is assault.

Look at the language being used on this thread...'whip', 'beat'...was this an extension cord? She struck a fifteen year-old with an extension cord? Oh, my. I got my butt tanned with belts, extension cords, and whatever when I was a teen...I deserved it, and lived to tell about it. No wonder we have generations of feral children out of control in this country. Maybe Mom should have given him a 'time out'.

33 posted on 03/16/2013 9:54:32 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Her mistake was in not having the 18 year old arrested for child molestation. There is no “consensual” anything with statutory rape.

However, Texas is a little different:

“According to Texas law, anyone can legally have sex. However, if the younger person in the relationship is less than seventeen years old and the older person is more than three years older than the younger person, the older partner has committed an offense.”

Thus, the cousin, at 18 years, would likely get away with it. Thus, if she wanted to take out her hostilities, it should have been with the cousin. The 15 year old can be dealt with later.

In this case, probably her best bet would be to “out” the cousin as not just a homosexual, but as a predator. Since he had likely done this before with other underage boys, *that* might get him arrested. Otherwise, it would be fair warning to his peers that he was a pervert, and *they* might be less than sympathetic.

As far as the 15 year old goes, I would hunt up a stern, religious, reeducation camp, and put him in it as a charity case. Since he is a minor, and legally something of a chattel to his parent or parents, she could do this legally, and he could not get out until he had turned 18.


34 posted on 03/16/2013 10:26:07 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Texas Statute 21.11

(b) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that the actor:
(1) was not more than three years older than the victim and of the opposite sex;

And the last qualifier would not stand up under Lawrence v. Texas.


35 posted on 03/16/2013 10:30:45 AM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (REPEAL WASHINGTON! -- Islam Delenda Est! -- I Want Constantinople Back. -- Rumble thee forth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

So you were beat with an electrical cord and think it is just fine and dandy. Well, as long as you live to tell about it, right? How about holding a kids hand on a hot burner? I mean after all, it’s ok if the kid lives to tell about it, right?

Well guess what? It isn’t. Only stupid people who can’t figure out appropriate and effective methods of teaching and disciplining their kids resort to this kind of crap.

If this idiot can’t handle a 15 year old without inflicting injury she shouldn’t have ever had kids.

Oh, and nice try including the part about where she “doesn’t believe in homosexuality”.

I saw right through that.

You are trying to imply that I am pro homo because I object to worthless trash injuring teenage kids by whipping them with electrical cords.

You are pathetic.


36 posted on 03/16/2013 11:57:31 AM PDT by Nik Naym (It's not my fault... I have compulsive smartass disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym
Oh, and nice try including the part about where she “doesn’t believe in homosexuality”.

What the hell is wrong with you??? You didn't see thru squat...I didn't say that...I was quoting the article.

As for equating getting 'struck with an electrical cord' with putting a kid's hand on a hot burner? Wow.

37 posted on 03/16/2013 12:46:00 PM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

“I’m not aware of a single state with age of consent that low.”

Sadly, In Ohio the age of consent is 13...


38 posted on 03/16/2013 2:04:13 PM PDT by Bshaw (A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: massmike

‘Is you serious?’

I was wondering what race these people were and now I know.


39 posted on 03/18/2013 2:16:49 AM PDT by POWERSBOOTHEFAN (Causing trouble since 1976)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

I was thinking the same thing. It was the cousin who should have been hit.


40 posted on 03/18/2013 2:18:26 AM PDT by POWERSBOOTHEFAN (Causing trouble since 1976)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson