Posted on 03/29/2013 5:23:11 PM PDT by ChessExpert
DEBATE about the reality of a two-decade pause in global warming and what it means has made its way from the sceptical fringe to the mainstream.
...
But the fact that global surface temperatures have not followed the expected global warming pattern is now widely accepted.
(Excerpt) Read more at theaustralian.com.au ...
Have they consulted with the “Goracle”? If not then we speak to soon.
He understands more than anyone that mass consumption of energy harnessed by man results in massive profits harnessed by evil capitalists.
Nah, nothing to do with any theory — it is intentional liberal deception for political reasons.
And the rest of the gullible world swallows it to appear compassionate and understanding.
Oops. I thought this was an evil capitalist thread. Turns out to just be a global warming bulls*it thread. /s
One hundred four year hiatus in World Series wins has Cubs fans puzzled.
My theory is governments around the world want an excuse for more taxes and regulations, so they'll fund anybody who promotes catastrophic man made global warming.
“the expected global warming pattern”
“Expected” by whom?
It was only expected by those who believed the lie!
” - - - “The global temperature standstill shows that climate models are diverging from observations,” says David Whitehouse of the Global Warming Policy Foundation. - - - “
At last, the junk scientists are being forced to test their computer models against the REALITY of observations.
BTW Whitehouse, the 1940’s showed the same observational pattern.
(PhysOrg.com) — Sunspot formation is triggered by a magnetic field, which scientists say is steadily declining. They predict that by 2016 there may be no remaining sunspots, and the sun may stay spotless for several decades. The last time the sunspots disappeared altogether was in the 17th and 18th century, and coincided with a lengthy cool period on the planet known as the Little Ice Age.
You need to go back to the sanctuary and chant with the others, “It’s man’s fault. It’s man’s fault. It’s man’s fault.” That’s your mantra.
They deny there ever was 'scientifically accepted' global cooling; therefore, they don't need to explain how/why it ended.
Their line of BS is that "most reputable" scientists in the field of the time quietly observed warming, while a very few scientists made "questionable and sensationalist" claims about cooling that "were never supported by reputable climate researchers"; but which were hyped in the popular press. Very Fenwickian bunch, they are.
Yes, but when sunspots and warming resume, the Global Average Temperature will rise 3C by 2525, allowing second floor balconies in Cleveland to reemerge from the ice.
Couldn't we? Just for tradition's sake?
Yes. I've heard that before. “Global cooling was just hype.” So, global warming isn't?
It seems to me that use of the term “climate change” is very curious. We are told that global warming and climate change are really the same thing. Just different words for the same theory.
How often does that happen? What are the different words for the Pythagorean theorem? Or Newton's first law of motion?
Furthermore, global warming and climate change make different predictions (warming vs. increased variability.) The idea that global warming = climate change is absurd. It is amazing that so many people have fallen for it. I think we should point out the distinction whenever we can. Global warming and climate change are two distinct theories.
I think Climate Change is a tacit acknowledgement that Global Warming is bunk. The twenty year hiatus in warming did not go unnoticed. It is being managed by the warming/change bait and switch.
I suspect we will see several distinct phases in mass indoctrination:
a) global warming
b) global warming / climate change
c) climate change
d) climate change / global cooling
e) global cooling
We are (and will be) told that each phase is "really the same thing" as the preceding phase. Memory of earlier phases will be lost by the indoctrinated. But for those few who are informed and can think, the transitive people suggests that a) global warming "is really the same thing" as e) global cooling. That is absurd. This reasoning chain went wrong somewhere. The first mistake is the claim that global warming is the same thing as climate change.
Correction in last paragraph:
transitive principle
(Sorry. Every time my palm brushes the track-pad my cursor jumps. It messes me up big time.)
Of course the phrase “our fraud has been discovered” evidently hasn’t yet entered their tiny minds.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.