Skip to comments.Public Service Announcement: Lt. Mike Zullo States "Every Obama Document Is Plagued With Problems."
Posted on 04/04/2013 9:31:58 AM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Maricopa County Sheriff Department's Cold Case Posse lead investigator Lt. Mike Zullo is right. Every personal document surrounding Barack Obama is plagued with problems. Obama has a social security number from Connecticut, a state where he never lived in or had a mailing address there. His selective service registration application has a inverted spliced two digit U.S. Postal pica date stamp when all other selective service applications have 4 digit stamps. His birth certificate has been found to be forged by a authoritative law enforcement entity. It's one thing after another. A question. Would the media have let candidate George W. Bush get away with so many personal document problems? I think we truly know the answer to that.
this is all well and good, but until this gets explained in sesame street-like terms to the LIV’s out there, via the lamestream media...frankly, im just bored with it.
we all know its true, i can cite chapter and verse to folks who dont know, and it does no good until sheriff Joe actually gets on all the media with a bullhorn and announces it with photographic proof/unimpeachable evidence, expert testimony, etc, IN A COURT OF LAW.
You should all take a very close look at your own records. Ask critical questions. Use scanning software to see if there's a secret message in there somewhere.
Ask Social Security all of the addresses of all of your employers......... My initial conclusion was the man is too stupid to take care of his own minor personal administrative matters. He's not the first and he won'[t be the last.
These guys need to get off this fruitless quest and go investigate something important.
Like did Dr. Ben Carson get a traffic ticket for speeding when he was 17?
“These guys need to get off this fruitless quest and go investigate something important.”
You don’t think wanting to uphold Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 and keep it from being subverted is important?
I guess my sarcasm was undetected.
only to idiots
Little bastard Canadian barry is exactly what those who hold the democrips strings want in office, a drug addled, 'articulate' but dumb as a post black-man.
Black people are being played for fools, and apparently don't mind so long as the handouts continue. Due to ingrained magic thinking, black people think they are being empowered by the residency of little bastard barry. The reality is they are being played, used, exploited, and will be 'sacrificed' in the orchestrated collapse that is coming very soon.
Apparently they (democrip voting black people) are too blinded by racial foolishness to see that when things collapse the government not can no longer feed and support them but will gladly cease to do so as the population is reduced to 'acceptable' agenda 21 levels.
I don't think trying to remove the usurper is important. While that communist is clearly drug-addled, clearly ineligible because he was not the child of two US citizen parents, and clearly anti-American, I don't believe we have any chance at all of removing the evil thug from our White House before January 20, 2013.
It would be better to put our resources into a mission that could be accomplished - like choosing the most conservative US Senate candidates possible who have a good chance of winning the eight potential pick up seats. It would be better to work on getting Sarah Palin or Paul Ryan established as the conservative front runner for the 2016 nomination before the establishment RINO locks up too much local support.
it makes one wonder why some people still think that the people’s vote actually pays a part in selecting who goes to DC
Yes, that is always the case when an entire personal history is conjured. 100% fabricated.
With the truth, the pieces fit.
With a lie, they never do.
Simple. Obozo lies 24/7. And his actions indicate he serves the father of lies.
There is much more to it than simple “minor personal administrative matters”. Most people I know can produce legitimate documents for most of those being questioned relatively easily, and yet Dear Leader can not produce a single one which does not have significant issues. To my knowledge this has never happened before for a President.
“My initial conclusion was the man is too stupid to take care of his own minor personal administrative matters. “
A newborn does not have to create his own birth certificate.
Your post is correct. Even Dwight Eisenhower had to produce a birth certificate in order to run for president.
Ike needed birth certificate to run for president
Ike had nothing to hide!
The article appeared on page 6A with a dateline of Sherman, Texas. It was headlined: Generals birth certificate officially filed, and stated, A certificate recording Dwight Eisenhowers birth in Denison on Oct. 14, 1890, was filed Wednesday [Oct. 1, 1952] in the Grayson County Clerks office.
Nobody had bothered to make out a certificate when the Republican presidential candidate was born in a house at the corner of Lamar and Day streets in nearby Denison.
Elected 34th president of the United States in November 1952, Eisenhower made it through his first 62 years without any need for a birth certificate.
However, the need arose when he became a presidential candidate. Since Eisenhower was the oldest man to be elected president since James Buchanan over 100 years earlier, age was obviously not at issue. Instead, there was protocol in place for presidential candidates to provide proof of eligibility to appear on the ballot.
One of the things many of us learned several years back was that in the rush to adopt every new cheaper more efficient technologically advanced method of 'official record' keeping method some of the transitions were really sloppy.
That's not to say Bama's stuff wasn't forged, but if he had it professionally done they'd make it look as bad as the real stuff ~ and they did!
That used to be fairly common!
I hope you don’t think this guy was born in Canada ~ the evidence for a British protectorate next door to Kenya is much more persuasive.
So the misdirection is working perfectly, eh?
They are clever.
....... Instead, there was protocol in place for presidential candidates to provide proof of eligibility to appear on the ballot.”
I wonder when that was done away with?
That's sort of surprising, since one didn't need to be a pediatric brain surgeon to pick up on it.
Obama might have been Kenyan - 100% Kenyan. In 1971 after his namesake father claimed him in family court to terminate his Indonesian citizenship.
Born in Kenya? When there is no evidence of any relationship between namesake father and supposed mother? And there is no record of her being on the island after the supposed marriage and birthing and does not arrive on the island until after namesake father is gone?
Kenya s stretch. Long stretch.
His African relatives (if, in fact, they really are relatives) are Luo who lived in the British East Africa Protectorate, and not Kenya!
Everyone who's followed this mystery for the last 6 years or so knows all about the situation ~ he wasn't born in Kenya. But that does not mean he wasn't born in the British East Africa Protectorate!
It was referenced as Kenya before 1963 and there are maps calling it that too. Kenya may not have been the formal or official name, but it was still known as Kenya.
‘known as’ still doesn’t mean ‘is’ ~ and Mombasa had this other name that reflected it’s political reality. If you read the background on who claimed Kenya and the founding of Mombasa you’ll find out why they were so long understood to be different places!
Well, except for the fact that Obama’s own publisher claimed he was born in Kenya for a full six years...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.