Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: coloradan

One of the ways I envision tunneling is the pole vaulter. At no time is the entire mass above the threshold; at no time is the center of mass above the threshold; and yet, the entire mass itself goes over the threshold. It is a pretty good illustration.

To extend the analogy, focusing on the center of mass and saying that it HAS to go above the threshold due to conservation of mass equations is simply wrongheaded. Focusing on conservation of energy on similarly micro-focused aspects of the overall energy system is also wrongheaded.


13 posted on 04/06/2013 10:31:39 PM PDT by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo

You haven’t answered my question, which is what isn’t conserved in tunneling? QM prevents us from talking about how transitions happen, only what the initial and final states are. If something isn’t conserved, I don’t know what it is, but the apparent physical impossibility of tunneling, in and of itself, isn’t a violation of conservation.


16 posted on 04/06/2013 10:41:01 PM PDT by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson