Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Early Dinosaur Embryos Found in China (Jurassic Park Now Possible?)
Discovery ^ | 04/11/2013 | D. MAZIERSKI

Posted on 04/11/2013 5:19:43 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: varmintman
varmintman: "Common sense. I've always had a lot of faith in that."

So, there we have it: a scientific question answered authoritatively by varmintman's "common sense".

And by such advanced methods has science advanced us from burning fires in caves to, oh, say, rockets into space... </sarc>

21 posted on 04/12/2013 11:07:29 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK
Common sense dictates that you pay attention to big-picture views i.e. to situations in which several data items point in the same direction. This is the Amerind "Mishipishu" petroglyph at Agawa Rock, Massinaw Lake Superior:

Mishipishu means "Water Panther" in Ojibway language. Amerind oral traditions describe this creature as having had a saw-blade back, reddish fur, and a "great spiked tail" which he used as a weapon.

Vine Deloria noted ("Red Earth, White Lies") that was a basic description of a stegosaur. Granted the image has horns and a stegosaur didn't; Indians were always in the habit of touching those glyphs up every few years and the horns were ae many centuries after the creature itself died out by an artist who figured he needed them.

Louis and Clark noted that their Indian guides were in mortal terror of those kinds of glyphs around the Mississippi, the original meaning of the glyphs was "Caution, one of these things LIVES here!"

Both the Amerind glyphs (there are numerous others) and the soft tissue turning up in dinosaur remains tell the same story; the thing about the 65,000,000 years is a bunch of BS.

22 posted on 04/12/2013 3:15:58 PM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: varmintman
varmintman: "Both the Amerind glyphs (there are numerous others) and the soft tissue turning up in dinosaur remains tell the same story; the thing about the 65,000,000 years is a bunch of BS."

Soft tissue in dinosaur remains appears to be naturally mummified.
The rarity of such finds suggests the right processes did not occur very often.

North American glyphs confirm what we know from virtually every other culture: humans are highly imaginative, and just love to embellish a great story.

;-)

23 posted on 04/13/2013 8:45:18 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK

De Nile.....

24 posted on 04/13/2013 12:27:32 PM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: varmintman
BJK: "...under what conditions can organic material be mummified well enough to survive many millions of years?"

varmintman: "Simple answer to that one: "None".
There aren't any such circumstances."

That sounds like a highly non-scientific De Nile to me.


25 posted on 04/13/2013 5:44:21 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson