Skip to comments.Washington Post: “We should have sent a reporter sooner”
Posted on 04/13/2013 7:27:51 AM PDT by Morgana
We believe the story is deserving of coverage by our own staff, and we intend to send a reporter for the resumption of the trial next week. In retrospect, we should have sent a reporter sooner.
~ Martin Baron, Executive Director of the Washington Post, speaking about the trial of accused mass murderer abortionist, Kermit Gosnell, April 12, this after WashPo reporter Sarah Kliff deemed it a mere local crime
Description of photo (click to enlarge), via J. D. Mullane of phillyburbs.com:
Three rows of seats reserved for the media remained empty Thursday morning April 11, 2013 in courtroom 304 at the Justice Center in Philadelphia where abortionist Dr. Kermit Gosnell is on trial, charged with seven counts of murder for killing seven born-alive children, and also a patient. The man at the rear of the courtroom is David P. Williams, of Delaware Right to Life, who covered the trial for his pro-life blog.
That would have just given the baby killing Democrats more time to dissemble, misquote, lie and equivocate the real truth. They are collectively responsible for the genocide of an ENTIRE generation of Americans, and they are quite literally responsible for hate crimes against black souls waiting to emerge into this world. A despicable group of ghouls that have their constituency completely fooled into thinking their life will be better with THEM in charge.
I am sure their stories won’t be biased at all.
What crimes are not local crimes? I’ve seen local stories about NYC banning soda’s and stuff in my local media.
Can’t wait to see how the MSM spins this when they do cover it.
We believe the story is deserving of coverage
Does Ozone get his arrogance from them, or do they get it from him? Hard to tell. Stay home idiots, you are way to late...as usual.
Try bringing this up in conversation with friends. You’ll likely discover that even rather well-informed friends don’t know about this trial.
Some bright progressive finally figured out he isn’t on trial for killing babies but for harming the women who came there to have their babies killed.
THAT they can cover.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
My sentiments exactly.
Well I guess there’s still time to report the defense’s side. \s
The fact is that if heat was not vbrought on them by Twitte and facebook and Free Republic they still wouldn’t be at the trial.
It simply does not fit their baby killing agenda.
They are still praising Killer Diller.
At least that's what I've heard.
A-12, below the fold.
Of course, all crimes are "local." Kliff meant to say, ...deemed it a mere local crime without national or international impact.
Which tells the bias of Ms. Kliff, and her intent [and the editors] to suppress.
“a day late and a dollar short as usual”
My thoughts exactly!
I think all of these “journalists” should receive pictures of baby angels. Tons and tons of them. Email them, tweet them, whatever. But everytime they open their email accounts, etc. they will be full of baby angels.
Maybe then they will get it.