Image currently posted at DrudgeReport with the title "AP: MOTIVATED BY RELIGION"

4/22/2013

[RoosterRedux]

This is the image posted at Drudge (the name of Allah)...

And this was the what was actually recorded by John the Revelator as "666"...

Curious to say the least!

[RoosterRedux]

Good point. But I don't think so. I have looked into that point and there is a good deal of confusion.

But there is little confusion that, in history, John the Revelator wrote "chi xi stigma" or

[RoosterRedux]

Oops sorry bout that. I should have known.

[Bobalu]

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

This.

[madison10]

Looking at it closer doesn’t help...LOL What are you trying to reveal?

[Bobalu]

I horizontally flipped the image....looks much like the first one now.

[combat_boots]

But there are ‘99’ names of allah. ;>

[Mount Athos]

Anyone see it?

http://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx?book=59&chapter=13&lid=en&side=r&verse=18&zoomSlider=0

[RoosterRedux]

Good work.

And as John the Revelator says..."This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number [symbol] of a man. That number is 666 [chi xi stigma]."

The fact that he emphasizes "number/symbol of a man" is confusing.

One might draw from that that John means the single leader (a man) of Islam. Or he might mean "human" as in not a deity but the human followers of such a deity.

I doubt the latter of those suggestions because the Apostle Paul has already told us that we are war with the Spiritual Realm...not the physical/human realm.

Bottom line...I think the AntiChrist is the ultimate leader of Islam...the Caliph.

Obama thinks he is the Caliph...but this chapter isn't over yet.

Obama is the leading figure at present...but time will tell.

Be wise...and clever.

[RoosterRedux]

Pls clarify...lost in your post.

[Excellence]

I learned something new today.

[Jess Kitting]

The number 666 is mentioned twice in the Bible, both are related to money:

During King Solomon's time:

1 Kings 10:14

By John the Revelator:

Revelation 13: 17-18

Coincidence?

[Mount Athos]

I’m following the reasoning given by Walid Shoeblat linked in earlier discussion here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFw2KrI3mng

At 2:25, he explicitly references the Codex Sinaiticus bible and says these symbols are not the greek letters for 666 and the actual symbols can be found there.

So I linked the relevant page in the Codex Sinaiticus containing Revelations 3:18 and am asking if anyone can confirm what he is saying and see these symbols he is talking about?

http://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx?book=59&chapter=13&lid=en&side=r&verse=18&zoomSlider=0

Or is it instead in the second copy he talks about, the Codex Vaticanus?

[RoosterRedux]

We don't know if this is the final "tell"...but be alert and watchful.

And pray all the time. Get tight with the Big Guy.;-)

[RoosterRedux]

We have to be very careful about not seeing the meaning in Scripture...and we have to be very careful about reading TOO MUCH into Scripture.

Stay thirsty my friend.;-) But be careful and vigilant.

[RoosterRedux]

Yep...that is pretty darned clear.

[Rightwing Conspiratr1]

I see true type letter kerning which was not available on third century typewriters!

[Mount Athos]

Are you saying you see the Symbols in the Codex Sinaiticus?

I do not see them. Perhaps I made a mistake?

[RoosterRedux]

The Walid Shoeblat video displayed the symbols clearly. I couldn’t find them in your Codex Sinaiticus link.

[Jess Kitting]

We have to be very careful about not seeing the meaning in Scripture...and we have to be very careful about reading TOO MUCH into Scripture.

Thanks for the admonition(s). A very interesting paradox.

I just came across the 1 Kings 10:14 reference to 666 while reading the Bible yesterday. I was amazed at the coincidence. Curious indeed, to say the least.