Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sir Napsalot

We are supposed to be ‘protected from attractive women’?

That’s a new one.


3 posted on 04/29/2013 6:21:34 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mnehring

I have the best protection there is-—I’m married...


6 posted on 04/29/2013 6:24:36 PM PDT by bigheadfred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

I don’t need this product , alas, because all the pretty women are already immune to me.


10 posted on 04/29/2013 6:28:28 PM PDT by faithhopecharity (()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

not physically, but it seems that it gives’guys better control dealing with them not going gaa gaaa over their looks and being more gullible because of it.

that said personally it wouldn’t help’me.


35 posted on 04/29/2013 10:08:14 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; narses; SunkenCiv; Nachum; MHGinTN; mnehring

Or, as a cynic once noted:

“Women will marry the richest man they can attract.

Men will marry the prettiest woman they can afford.”

To put that in perspective ...
The socialist-democrat party is aggressively pursuing ugly women and gay men with trillions in government money.
The republican party is successfully attracting the prettiest women in politics, often by promising to reduce taxes and spending.


47 posted on 05/01/2013 3:17:52 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson