Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Multiple Obama Birth Certificates Surface In Alabama Eligibility Case
Minute Men News ^ | 1 May 2013

Posted on 05/01/2013 4:39:34 PM PDT by null and void

Not that we are surprised, but now there are multiple copies of Barack Hussein Obama’s “real” birth certificate that are surfacing and they are clearly indicating fraud. In a rare move, the Alabama Democrat Party has submitted an amicus brief in the McInnish Goode v Chapman Appeal case. The reason being is most likely because the Alabama Supreme Court has Chief Justice Roy Moore presiding over it. The Alabama Democrat Party just submitted a completely different birth certificate than the one that was posted at the White House website in 2011.

Larry Klayman, the plaintiff’s counsel submitted the forgery of Barack Hussein Obama’s birth certificate that was posted to whitehouse.gov on 4-27-2001 (seen below). Fogbow/Jack Ryan obot group produced another bogus one. Still a third birth certificate has been submitted by Alabama Democrats to the Supreme Court.

Remember, this court is being presided over by Chief Justice Roy Moore, who supported Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, when he believed Obama to be a usurper and denied following orders to deploy to Iraq until Obama proved his eligibility as part of keeping his oath (ironically Lakin was not supported by Mr. Oathkeeper Stewart Rhodes). Another justice on the court by the name of Tom Parker will also hear the case. He has stated in a previous case:

“McInnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the “short form” and the “long form” birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.”

While the Alabama Democrats attacked the merits of the appeal, calling the evidence by McInnish “inadmissible and not worthy of belief,” they also stated “A county sheriff from Arizona is not an ‘official source’ of anything in Alabama.”

Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birther; certifigate; harvardresumefraud; naturalborncitizen; notruth; novalidity; noveritas
“A county sheriff from Arizona is not an ‘official source’ of anything in Alabama.”

Arizona should IMMEDIATELY suspend any extradition requests from Alabama, citing reciprocity...

1 posted on 05/01/2013 4:39:34 PM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: null and void; Absolutely Nobama; aragorn; Art in Idaho; Aurorales; autumnraine; azishot; ...
Constitutional Eligibility

2 posted on 05/01/2013 4:40:07 PM PDT by null and void (Republicans create the tools of oppression and Democrats use them. Gun confiscation enables tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

are multiple birth certificates that are without the official seal from hawaii a legitimate source. The Case in point multiple birth certificates. what do not they understand in that word. but obama is the chief executive and his word is law. right and he writes laws too. ( I know the executive branch does not write laws, but Obama thinks he does by executive orders).


3 posted on 05/01/2013 4:45:11 PM PDT by hondact200 (Candor dat viribos alas (sincerity gives wings to strength) and Nil desperandum (never despair))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Error: "04-27-2001" should be "04-27-2011"

Consider this..

THE ABOVE VERSION of 0bama's bc was posted at this Hawaiian website on 03-18-2010 (One year BEFORE 0bama released HIS version). Notice caveat at the bottom.

4 posted on 05/01/2013 4:49:07 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hondact200
are multiple birth certificates that are without the official seal from hawaii a legitimate source.

What difference does or would a state seal make? Considering the raw quantity of blatantly obvious fraud we've seen to date, I believe it's only reasonable to assume adding a state seal to this document, that, or any number of othes would be worth however much trouble is involved in adding a seal: probably ten seconds' worth of effort.

5 posted on 05/01/2013 4:49:53 PM PDT by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Please add me to the PING list if you do not mind.


6 posted on 05/01/2013 4:50:22 PM PDT by stockpirate (Planned Parenthood, murdering black children one baby at a time.......where is the outrage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

Id don’t mind in the slightest, indeed, I rather enjoy it...


7 posted on 05/01/2013 4:54:55 PM PDT by null and void (Republicans create the tools of oppression and Democrats use them. Gun confiscation enables tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

Is it customary to name the father Sr. at the birth of II?


8 posted on 05/01/2013 4:58:45 PM PDT by depressed in 06 (America conceived in liberty, dies in slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

Mrs Obama had a passport. What did it say about her travels?


9 posted on 05/01/2013 5:02:32 PM PDT by ex-snook (God is Love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost; null and void; LucyT

Haven’t seen that version. Another hmmmmm?


10 posted on 05/01/2013 5:04:05 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook

Mrs Obama had a passport. What did it say about her travels?

was she ever Mrs Obama ?


11 posted on 05/01/2013 5:14:44 PM PDT by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: molson209
"was she ever Mrs Obama ?"

Whatever.

12 posted on 05/01/2013 5:19:36 PM PDT by ex-snook (God is Love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome
Related thread here

Not quite a duplicate thread...

13 posted on 05/01/2013 5:24:25 PM PDT by null and void (Republicans create the tools of oppression and Democrats use them. Gun confiscation enables tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Roger, Rover. :)


14 posted on 05/01/2013 5:26:42 PM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (No more usurpers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: depressed in 06

I don’t know, but it is customary to name the son “Jr.” when he’s named exactly as the father. And Obama is called II, like John Paul II, who is in no way related to John Paul I.


15 posted on 05/01/2013 5:33:19 PM PDT by rabidralph (http://www.cafepress.com/westernwis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; GeorgeWashingtonsGhost; null and void

“Madlyn” isn’t the proper spelling of Stanley Ann’s mom’s first name.

The “e” was left off; it should be “Madelyn”.

Wonder who filled THAT one out?

I remember seeing this in a thread here, way back ..... I recall the typed stuff at the bottom.


16 posted on 05/01/2013 5:35:29 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: null and void

bkmk


17 posted on 05/01/2013 5:50:06 PM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57
Never read a signature literally. It's not unusual for signatures to deviate from actual spellings. Not at all unusual.

Here's Jack Lew's:


18 posted on 05/01/2013 5:51:09 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook; GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

Passport records for 0’s mom around 1961 are.......missing.

:0


19 posted on 05/01/2013 5:56:33 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Yep, add me too...thank you.


20 posted on 05/01/2013 6:05:30 PM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag ( EVERY DIME Obama Spends is given to him by the Republicans in the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: null and void

nobama hired some very fancy lawyers, paid a bunch of bucks (in excess of 1mil IIRCC) and issued an EO to seal his records.

Only problem is, the Internet has become so pervasive it likely would be impossible to seal ALL the records. Stuff is gonna leak out over time.


21 posted on 05/01/2013 6:08:19 PM PDT by upchuck (To the faceless, jack-booted government bureaucrat who just scanned this post: SCREW YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57; null and void

When trying to find the probate records of Charles Rolla (Rollo )Payne ( died October 1968) the establishment of the Madelyn Payne Durham trust that O lists on schedule e of his taxes; o
ne thing that stuck out was multiple spelling of names. Maddy became head of the trust escrow dept moved to the penthouse and became BO legal guardian about the time of probate. NOTHING surprises me about that woman or anything she may have had a part in!


22 posted on 05/01/2013 6:08:33 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Thanks (as always) for the ping!


23 posted on 05/01/2013 6:21:12 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: molson209

She was in the divorce decree.


24 posted on 05/01/2013 6:23:41 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: null and void

If you or I waved so many different BCs around, we’d be behind bars.


25 posted on 05/01/2013 6:31:29 PM PDT by bgill (The problem is...no one is watching the Watch List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus; ex-snook

She? You mean Stanley Ann? There is no evidence she and the Kenyan 0bama were ever married.

If by Mrs. Obama you mean the woman he married who went to the Philippines, that’s another matter.


26 posted on 05/01/2013 6:41:06 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

You mean Stanley Ann Dunham.

The purported alleged mother of the guy in the WH.


27 posted on 05/01/2013 6:41:59 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57
“Madlyn” isn’t the proper spelling of Stanley Ann’s mom’s first name. The “e” was left off; it should be “Madelyn”.

It could be a legitimate signature. Introduction of subtle differences is a good security trick. Signatures are not even supposed to be your name, written by hand - they are supposed to be unique handwriting that is tough for a stranger to copy correctly. My own signature, for example, does not exactly spell out my name - it begins with characters, but then quickly devolves into something completely different.

Yet another aspect is that signatures are formed in adolescence, when young people start needing them. They could prefer a different form of their name then. Obama's grandmother was born in 1922, and her signature was probably fully defined by 1942. It was 70 years ago; many styles and fashions changed since then.

Of course, it should be trivial to find a few papers with her true signature and compare. She signed thousands of personal checks, for example; but she worked as a VP of a small bank - can you imagine that she didn't have to sign a hundred papers per day at work?

28 posted on 05/01/2013 7:14:46 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Then this settles it, at least one of them has got to be real. (Channeling Beck)


29 posted on 05/01/2013 7:18:03 PM PDT by stevio (God, guns, guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThePatriotsFlag

Consider yourself at home.
Consider yourself one of the family.

Consider yourself part of the furniture.

Consider yourself our mate.
We don’t want to have no fuss,
For after some consideration, we can state...
Consider yourself
One of us!


30 posted on 05/01/2013 7:25:18 PM PDT by null and void (Republicans create the tools of oppression and Democrats use them. Gun confiscation enables tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: null and void

The blot thickens!

Please add me to the ping list FRiend.


31 posted on 05/01/2013 7:31:59 PM PDT by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MV=PY

Added. I’m musicked out for the moment, unless you want a Nose Full of Nickles...


32 posted on 05/01/2013 7:34:18 PM PDT by null and void (Republicans create the tools of oppression and Democrats use them. Gun confiscation enables tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

The 1964 divorce decree lists Stanley Ann D. Obama as Libellant vs. Barack H. Obama as Libellee. It states that they were lawfully married in Wailuku, Maui, Hawaii, on February 2, 1961. The divorce decree also lists one child born to said Libellant and Libellee, Barack Hussein Obama, II, a son, born on August 4, 1961.


33 posted on 05/01/2013 7:37:02 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

I have less than no interest in sparring with an apologist for 0bastard.

This topic was discussed down to the atoms a few years ago. It is legally possible and has been done in the past, to “divorce” someone the person wasn’t married to. Happens.


34 posted on 05/01/2013 7:51:01 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

The suspicious thing about that copy is that HRS 338-17.8 didn’t become law until 1982. So, how can a BC issued in 1961 cite a law that didn’t exist until 1982 ?


35 posted on 05/01/2013 7:54:10 PM PDT by TheCipher (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself- Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost; EveningStar; Brown Deer
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Evening Star,

Check out article, and # 4 .

.

36 posted on 05/01/2013 8:09:09 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheCipher

It’s possible that they went back and added that code as an addendum to the birth certificates that fell under that law.. Doubtful, but possible. Notice it’s crooked as though it had been added later.


37 posted on 05/01/2013 8:45:26 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

that is not quite correct. There was the infamous short form released around June 2008. That got increasingly lambasted as a forgery. obama stood by that document until the 2011 version. so the 2008 version has been forgotten. One forgery, then two, and now, who knows how many.

To our eyes his walls are crumbling. but it will be the press which will defend him to the last.


38 posted on 05/01/2013 9:10:58 PM PDT by bioqubit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Greysard

Re signatures..

Haste plus tons of things to sign equals illegibility (think doctors, celebrities)

So yes, quite possible...

And examples of SADOs moms signature could be found among those FOIA docs of SADO.


39 posted on 05/01/2013 9:21:15 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost; TheCipher

G W G, The cipher

Good catch on the law cite & when it came into being!

That right there says volumes.

I doubt that the archivists would go back and update everything every time a new law came into being, so it looks like somebody did something in that year.

Either added at the bottom, or when the whole thing was created.


40 posted on 05/01/2013 9:30:54 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

See FRmail :)


41 posted on 05/01/2013 9:33:12 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; null and void

Hoosiermama, null and void

Along w the signatures, the fact that Madelyn setup a trust for 0 says a lot.

Would she leave a sizable chunk of money to someone that wasn’t a relative? I don’t think she would.

Null and void,

Many thanks for the ping!


42 posted on 05/01/2013 9:38:36 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

Someone important wanted the kid to have money, so it was funneled through Madelyn, since she was the purported grandmother, it looked reasonable. What easeir way to fund the kid.


43 posted on 05/01/2013 10:32:16 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

The flood of U.S. bc fakes is intentional; Decoys. 0bama’s favorite technique.. ‘Hey, look over here (U.S.)!’ This means, look at Kenya for the answer.


44 posted on 05/01/2013 11:16:18 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Kindly add me to the ping list. Thank you!


45 posted on 05/02/2013 8:22:55 AM PDT by Nea Wood (When life gets too hard to stand, kneel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nea Wood

Done!


46 posted on 05/02/2013 8:27:59 AM PDT by null and void (Republicans create the tools of oppression and Democrats use them. Gun confiscation enables tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: upchuck; null and void

” Stuff is gonna leak out over time.”

Yeah, but not soon enough.


47 posted on 05/02/2013 10:10:35 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Actually, if three different "birth certificates" have been submitted to the court, then it's time for Larry Klayman to make Hawaii verify that it issued any of those certificates. The rules of evidence in Alabama can make those certificates inadmissable.
If the copy is certified, then it may be self-authenticating by use of court rule, various authorizing statutes, or Ala.R.Evid. 902(1) through (4) (dealing with certified copy or copies under seal). Should an uncertified copy be offered, then the authenticating foundation set out in Rule 901 must be established. Courts applying Rule 901 admit uncertified records only if they are accompanied by testimony of the custodian, or some other witness qualified to testify, that the record does come from the public office where such documents are customarily kept.

It's time to put Alvin T. Onaka Ph.D. on the stand and/or to make the HI DOH directly release any and all of its record to the court.

48 posted on 05/02/2013 7:38:49 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson