Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

August will be the 112th anniversary of the 1901 flight of Whitehead's No. 21
http://pediaview.com/openpedia/Whitehead_No._21 | 5/3/13

Posted on 05/03/2013 8:59:53 AM PDT by pabianice

The new Jane's All the World's Aircraft now lists Gustave Whitehead as the first to fly a powered airplane.

"...Today, it seems impossible that a vast cache of documentary evidence, such as those newspaper reports, can be overlooked by the world at large. True, there are small museums to Whitehead in both his homeland and adopted homeland (and gratitude is expressed to Flughistorische Forschungsgemeinschaft Gustav Weisskopf at Leutershausen for copyright photographs used here) but it is too easy to dismiss them as municipal monuments to a local boy. The reasons for the vanished recognition are several. The first is that critical examination of the Wrights' legacy is deflected by a non-sequitur of elephantine proportions: That because they were the most successful of the early aeroplane pioneers, they must have been 'the first to fly'..."

http://www.janes.com/products/janes/defence-security-report.aspx?ID=1065976994


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; History; Miscellaneous; Science
KEYWORDS: missinglink; sourcetitlenoturl

1 posted on 05/03/2013 8:59:53 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pabianice

The early bird gets the worm, but it’s the second mouse who gets the cheese...


2 posted on 05/03/2013 9:09:16 AM PDT by null and void ("Och, aye 'twas a huge beastie the shape of a haggis but the size o' the football pitch at Dunkeld!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

And it’s the early worm that gets to be a birds breakfast. Weisskopf was likely the first but the Wright Flyer was donated to the Smithsonian on the contractual condition that the museum would never allow a prior claim.


3 posted on 05/03/2013 9:17:28 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

Smithsonian wanted their boy, Langley, to be first. They would not want the Wrights’ plane for years. That’s probably the point of the “claim disallow”.


4 posted on 05/03/2013 9:52:07 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Unfamiliar with Whitehead, but the Wright Brothers developed controlled flight. They understood the principles.

The advance from an unpowered glider rolling down a ramp to a powered but uncontrolled wing is not IMO that notable a leap.

5 posted on 05/03/2013 10:14:29 AM PDT by R W Reactionairy ("Everyone is entitled to their own opinion ... but not to their own facts" Daniel Patrick Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R W Reactionairy

The newspaper accounts claim that he made many controlled flights covering circular and figure-eight courses. Photos will eventually be found. That is hardly an “uncontrollable wing.” Replicas have been flying since 1980.


6 posted on 05/03/2013 10:23:23 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

http://sheltonherald.com/13153/part-2-whitehead-acknowledgment-adds-to-states-aviation-legacy/


7 posted on 05/03/2013 10:28:30 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
A flying wing...


8 posted on 05/03/2013 10:32:24 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


9 posted on 05/03/2013 10:32:53 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


10 posted on 05/03/2013 10:33:44 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


11 posted on 05/03/2013 10:34:18 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Definitely subsonic.
12 posted on 05/03/2013 11:08:00 AM PDT by bytesmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Thanks for the link to the newspaper story. The Jane's link wouldn't work. Still plenty of questions .. few answers. A definite maybe pending more research.

Would love to know whether the replicas were exact replicas including the materials. Noticed what appears to be a king post for negative Gs in the photo. Doesn't seem like something that would appear in an early prototype, but maybe 21 was the 21st attempt.

13 posted on 05/03/2013 11:54:03 AM PDT by R W Reactionairy ("Everyone is entitled to their own opinion ... but not to their own facts" Daniel Patrick Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

The Wrights were not the first to fly?

Next, they’ll be telling us “The Jazz Singer” wasn’t the first talkie, “The Wizard of Oz” wasn’t the first movie in color, Milton Berle wasn’t the first man on television...


14 posted on 05/03/2013 12:57:43 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan (If you're FOR sticking scissors in a female's neck and sucking out her brains, you are PRO-WOMAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson